World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6080 5655 3304 3001 143 12012

Panayiota Kendeou publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Panayiota Kendeou between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Panayiota Kendeou published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 18 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Panayiota Kendeou: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 1
2005 5
2006 0
2007 5
2008 6
2009 8
2010 0
2011 9
2012 9
2013 5
2014 15
2015 7
2016 7
2017 10
2018 2
2019 7
2020 14
2021 11
2022 14
2023 13
2024 11
2025 7
Total 169
Download as CSV

Panayiota Kendeou publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panayiota Kendeou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 143
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Panayiota Kendeou D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panayiota Kendeou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Panayiota Kendeou is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and social sciences, with a significant focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. The primary fields of study for Kendeou include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader fields, their work concentrates on subfields such as:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their research topics frequently explore areas including:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills
  • Media Influence and Health

Kendeou has contributed to a range of publications, with frequent appearances in several academic journals. The venues most associated with their work include:

  • Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Reading and Writing
  • Discourse Processes
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Kendeou are:

  • "The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction" (2022), Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "How the Reading for Understanding Initiative's Research Complicates the Simple View of Reading Invoked in the Science of Reading" (2020), Reading Research Quarterly
  • "ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education" (2023), Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "Reading Comprehension" (2020), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education
  • "The effects of positive and negative emotional text content on knowledge revision" (2020), Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Kendeou has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Reese Butterfuss
  • Jasmine Kim
  • Kristen L. McMaster
  • HyeJin Hwang
  • Victoria A. Johnson

In terms of book publications, Kendeou has published works through the Swiss School of Archaeology in Greece, such as "The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation" (2021).

Kendeou holds distinctions as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) and the American Educational Research Association, both awarded in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Predicting Reading Comprehension in Early Elementary School: The Independent Contributions of Oral Language and Decoding Skills

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul van den Broek;Mary Jane White;Julie S. Lynch

  • The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.

    Panayiota Kendeou;Paul van den Broek

  • A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul Van Den Broek;Anne Helder;Josefine Karlsson

  • Higher-Order Comprehension Processes in Struggling Readers: A Perspective for Research and Intervention

    David N. Rapp;Paul Van Den Broek;Kristen L McMaster;Panayiota A Kendeou

  • Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension

    Paul Van Den Broek;David N. Rapp;Panayiota A Kendeou

  • Simple but complex: components of the simple view of reading across grade levels

    Janet Tilstra;Kristen McMaster;Paul Van Den Broek;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Children's inference generation across different media

    Panayiota Kendeou;Catherine Bohn-Gettler;Mary Jane White;Paul Van Den Broek

  • Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts : The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions

    Paul van den Broek;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change

    Irene Anna N. Diakidoy;Panayiota Kendeou;Christos Ioannides

  • The Effects of Readers' Misconceptions on Comprehension of Scientific Text

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul Van Den Broek

  • The Development of Narrative Comprehension and Its Relation to Other Early Reading Skills

    Julie S. Lynch;Paul van den Broek;Kathleen E. Kremer;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Knowledge Revision Processes in Refutation Texts

    Panayiota Kendeou;Erinn K. Walsh;Emily R. Smith;Edward J. O'Brien

  • The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension.

    Reese Butterfuss;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Revisiting the simple view of reading

    Panayiota Kendeou;Robert S. Savage;Paul Van den Broek

  • Developing Successful Readers: Building Early Comprehension Skills through Television Viewing and Listening

    Panayiota Kendeou;Julie S. Lynch;Paul van den Broek;Chris A. Espin

  • Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters.

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Emily R. Smith;Edward J. O'Brien

  • Investigating the Double-Deficit Hypothesis in Greek: Findings From a Longitudinal Study

    Timothy C. Papadopoulos;George K. Georgiou;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders

    Kristen L. McMaster;Paul van den Broek;Christine A. Espin;Mary Jane White

  • Reading Comprehension: Core Components and Processes

    Panayiota Kendeou;Kristen L. McMaster;Theodore J. Christ

  • Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension

    David Neil Rapp;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: a comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches

    Irene Anna N. Diakidoy;Panayiota A Kendeou

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul van den Broek
Paul van den Broek Leiden University
David N. Rapp
David N. Rapp Northwestern University
Edward J. O'Brien
Edward J. O'Brien University of New Hampshire
Kristen L. McMaster
Kristen L. McMaster University of Minnesota
George Spanoudis
George Spanoudis University of Cyprus
Michalinos Zembylas
Michalinos Zembylas Open University of Cyprus
Krista R. Muis
Krista R. Muis McGill University
Ivar Bråten
Ivar Bråten University of Oslo
Christine A. Espin
Christine A. Espin Leiden University
Gale M. Sinatra
Gale M. Sinatra University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers diverse opportunities, especially with the growing availability of online degrees and flexible learning pathways. Many students choose online programs for their convenience and ability to accommodate different schedules and life commitments. These options allow learners to pursue specialized roles in counseling, clinical psychology, and more.

For those interested in counseling, understanding state-specific requirements is key. For example, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Delaware outlines the educational and licensure steps unique to that state. Similarly, aspiring counselors can explore Florida fastest counseling programs to determine accelerated routes for meeting qualifications.

If you’re located elsewhere, examining the fastest way to become a counselor in Georgia or investigating the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Hawaii can provide insight into regional requirements and options for expediting your career journey.

Whether you seek to specialize in counseling, research, or another psychology-related field, exploring state-specific resources and online degree programs can help you find the most efficient and suitable pathway to achieving your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Panayiota Kendeou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles