World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3859 3557 2164 1946 130 13801

Marcia A. Barnes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcia A. Barnes between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcia A. Barnes published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2004. 6 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2004. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 9 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1984 2025

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcia A. Barnes: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 3
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 8
2002 7
2003 1
2004 9
2005 1
2006 4
2007 7
2008 2
2009 6
2010 9
2011 1
2012 2
2013 9
2014 7
2015 7
2016 7
2017 7
2018 3
2019 6
2020 5
2021 7
2022 4
2023 6
2024 2
2025 4
Total 144
Download as CSV

Marcia A. Barnes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia A. Barnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 130
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcia A. Barnes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia A. Barnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcia A. Barnes is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and mathematics, with a strong focus on developmental and educational psychology. The research also incorporates elements of statistics and probability, cognitive neuroscience, education, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main research topics covered by Barnes include reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, mind wandering and attention, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, educational and psychological assessments, writing and handwriting education, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Barnes have included Sharon Vaughn, Paul T. Cirino, Greg Roberts, Nathan H. Clemens, and Lynn S. Fuchs.

Key publication venues in which Barnes has frequently published are:

  • Annals of Dyslexia
  • Learning and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Scientific Studies of Reading
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Barnes include:

  • Alternative paths to improved word-problem performance: An advantage for embedding prealgebraic reasoning instruction within word-problem intervention. (2020, Journal of Educational Psychology)
  • Building word-problem solving and working memory capacity: A randomized controlled trial comparing three intervention approaches. (2022, Journal of Educational Psychology)
  • Sustained Attention and Behavioral Ratings of Attention in Struggling Readers. (2020, Scientific Studies of Reading)
  • Visual attention and reading: A test of their relation across paradigms. (2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • The Word-Problem Solving and Explanations of Students Experiencing Mathematics Difficulty: A Comparison Based on Dual-Language Status. (2020, Learning Disability Quarterly)

Best Publications

  • Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Maureen Dennis;David J. Francis;Paul T. Cirino;Russell Schachar

  • Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge.

    Kate Cain;Jane V. Oakhill;Marcia A. Barnes;Marcia A. Barnes;Peter E. Bryant

  • When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Marcia A. Barnes;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches

    Unknown

  • A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics

    Peng Peng;Jessica M. Namkung;Marcia Barnes;Congying Sun

  • A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory.

    Peng Peng;Marcia Barnes;Cui Cui Wang;Wei Wang

  • Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation.

    Jack M. Fletcher;G. Reid Lyonm;Marcia Barnes;Karla K. Stuebing

  • Late intellectual and academic outcomes following traumatic brain injury sustained during early childhood.

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Mary R Prasad;Larry A Kramer;Charles S Cox

  • The Contribution of Attentional Control and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension and Decoding

    C. Nikki Arrington;Paulina A. Kulesz;David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Modeling of longitudinal academic achievement scores after pediatric traumatic brain injury.

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Marcia Barnes;Jack M Fletcher;Harvey S Levin

  • Classification of Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Evaluation. Executive Summary.

    Jack M. Fletcher;G. Reid Lyon;Marcia Barnes;Karla K. Stuebing

  • Assessment of Reading and Learning Disabilities A Research-Based Intervention-Oriented Approach

    Jack M Fletcher;Jack M Fletcher;Jack M Fletcher;Barbara R Foorman;Barbara R Foorman;Barbara R Foorman;Amy Boudousquie;Amy Boudousquie;Amy Boudousquie;Marcia A Barnes;Marcia A Barnes;Marcia A Barnes

  • The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age

    Marcia A. Barnes;Marcia A. Barnes;Maureen Dennis;Jennifer Haefele-Kalvaitis

  • A model of neurocognitive function in spina bifida over the life span

    Maureen Dennis;Susan H. Landry;Marcia Barnes;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12

    Yusra Ahmed;David J. Francis;Mary York;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Arrested development and disrupted callosal microstructure following pediatric traumatic brain injury: Relation to neurobehavioral outcomes

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Mary R Prasad;Paul R Swank;Larry A Kramer

  • The Cognitive Phenotype of Spina Bifida Meningomyelocele.

    Maureen Dennis;Marcia A. Barnes

  • Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message : aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence

    Maureen Dennis;Marcia A. Barnes

  • Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury.

    Maureen Dennis;Karen Purvis;Marcia A. Barnes;Margaret Wilkinson

  • Errors in Multi-Digit Arithmetic and Behavioral Inattention in Children With Math Difficulties

    Kimberly Raghubar;Paul Cirino;Marcia Barnes;Linda Ewing-Cobbs

  • Attentional-inhibitory control and social-behavioral regulation after childhood closed head injury: do biological, developmental, and recovery variables predict outcome?

    Maureen Dennis;Sharon Guger;Caroline Roncadin;Marcia Barnes

  • Early brain injury in children: Development and reorganization of cognitive function

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Marcia A. Barnes;Jack M. Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen Dennis
Maureen Dennis University of Toronto
Susan H. Landry
Susan H. Landry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Paul R. Swank
Paul R. Swank The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Linda Ewing-Cobbs The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
David J. Francis
David J. Francis University of Houston
Harvey S. Levin
Harvey S. Levin Baylor College of Medicine
Beth M. Phillips
Beth M. Phillips Florida State University
Russell Schachar
Russell Schachar University of Toronto
Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees opens up a wide range of career opportunities. With the growth of virtual learning, more students can access high-quality education from anywhere in the country. Whether you are looking to pursue a full bachelor’s or a specialized master’s degree, there are excellent programs tailored to fit different needs and goals.

For those interested in becoming a counselor, the best value counseling master's programs in the South offer affordable tuition with strong career prospects. If you prefer opportunities in the Northeast, exploring the best value counseling degrees in New York can be a smart move.

If you’re considering a psychology undergraduate degree, the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Alabama provides insight into reputable southern universities. Alternatively, you may look at the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Cincinnati for options in the Midwest.

Choosing the right online program is key to aligning your education with your long-term career path, whether in clinical practice, research, or counseling services.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia A. Barnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles