World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1789 1610 1052 925 250 20480

Paul R. Swank publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul R. Swank between 1978 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul R. Swank published across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 5 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications
1978 2019

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul R. Swank: publications per year, 1978 to 2019
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 3
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 5
1988 3
1989 8
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 5
1994 3
1995 4
1996 8
1997 10
1998 12
1999 8
2000 11
2001 8
2002 10
2003 6
2004 11
2005 6
2006 14
2007 9
2008 9
2009 14
2010 11
2011 10
2012 8
2013 17
2014 10
2015 8
2016 9
2017 8
2018 2
2019 3
Total 270
Download as CSV

Paul R. Swank publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Swank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 250 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 250
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul R. Swank D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Swank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul R. Swank is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research is situated within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

The primary area of investigation for Swank involves topics related to Infant Development and Preterm Care. Their contributions to these subjects are reflected in the research outputs and thematic focus observed.

Swank has collaborated with several co-authors throughout their research career. Notable frequent collaborators include:

  • Susan H. Landry
  • Karen E. Smith

This suggests interdisciplinary cooperation in their studies, possibly enhancing the scope and depth of investigation in pediatric and perinatal health.

Though specific publication venues and book publishers are not detailed, the concentration within Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health indicates engagement with specialized academic journals dedicated to these medical subfields.

Best Publications

  • Responsive parenting: establishing early foundations for social, communication, and independent problem-solving skills.

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank

  • Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children's development or is consistency across early childhood necessary?

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank;Mike A. Assel

  • A Responsive Parenting Intervention: The Optimal Timing Across Early Childhood for Impacting Maternal Behaviors and Child Outcomes

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank;Cathy Guttentag

  • Patterns of adjustment among children of battered women.

    John H. Grych;Ernest N. Jouriles;Paul R. Swank;Renee McDonald

  • Early Maternal and Child Influences on Children's Later Independent Cognitive and Social Functioning

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank;Cynthia L. Miller-Loncar

  • Predicting cognitive-language and social growth curves from early maternal behaviors in children at varying degrees of biological risk.

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Cynthia L. Miller-Loncar;Paul R. Swank

  • Effect of erythropoietin and transfusion threshold on neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial

    Claudia S. Robertson;H. Julia Hannay;Jose-Miguel Yamal;Shankar Gopinath

  • The Role of Early Parenting in Children's Development of Executive Processes

    Susan H. Landry;Cynthia L. Miller-Loncar;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank

  • Effectiveness of Comprehensive Professional Development for Teachers of At-Risk Preschoolers

    Susan H. Landry;Jason L. Anthony;Paul R. Swank;Pauline Monseque-Bailey

  • Enhancing Early Literacy Skills for Preschool Children Bringing a Professional Development Model to Scale

    Susan H. Landry;Paul R. Swank;Karen E. Smith;Michael A. Assel

  • Late intellectual and academic outcomes following traumatic brain injury sustained during early childhood.

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Mary R Prasad;Larry A Kramer;Charles S Cox

  • Self-esteem and women with disabilities

    Margaret A Nosek;Rosemary B Hughes;Nancy Swedlund;Heather B Taylor

  • High Versus Low Implementation of Instructional Support Teams A Case for Maintaining Program Fidelity

    Joseph F. Kovaleski;Edward E. Gickling;Henry Morrow;Paul R. Swank

  • Modeling of longitudinal academic achievement scores after pediatric traumatic brain injury.

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Marcia Barnes;Jack M Fletcher;Harvey S Levin

  • The effects of a responsive parenting intervention on parent-child interactions during shared book reading.

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank;Tricia Zucker

  • Frontal and Temporal Morphometric Findings on MRI in Children after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Jill V. Hunter;Mary R. Newsome;Randall S. Scheibel

  • The Relation of Change in Maternal Interactive Styles to the Developing Social Competence of Full-Term and Preterm Children

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Cynthia L. Miller-Loncar;Paul R. Swank

  • The Importance of Parenting During Early Childhood for School-Age Development

    Susan H. Landry;Karen E. Smith;Paul R. Swank

  • Watch, Discover, Think, and Act: evaluation of computer-assisted instruction to improve asthma self-management in inner-city children

    L. K. Bartholomew;R. S. Gold;G. S. Parcel;D. I. Czyzewski

  • Relation of infant feeding practices, cigarette smoke exposure, and group child care to the onset and duration of otitis media with effusion in the first two years of life

    Mary Jean Owen;Mary Jean Owen;Constance D. Baldwin;Constance D. Baldwin;Paul R. Swank;Paul R. Swank;Amarjit K. Pannu;Amarjit K. Pannu

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan H. Landry
Susan H. Landry The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Linda Ewing-Cobbs The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Marcia A. Barnes
Marcia A. Barnes Vanderbilt University
Harvey S. Levin
Harvey S. Levin Baylor College of Medicine
Jason L. Anthony
Jason L. Anthony University of South Florida
Gerri Hanten
Gerri Hanten Baylor College of Medicine
Sally W. Vernon
Sally W. Vernon The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Renee McDonald
Renee McDonald Southern Methodist University
Beth M. Phillips
Beth M. Phillips Florida State University
Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology can open doors to a range of rewarding opportunities, especially if you are considering online degrees. Many students begin with an undergraduate program before pursuing advanced qualifications such as a master’s or doctoral degree. Specializations like counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology are popular options that prepare graduates for professional roles.

For those aiming to become licensed therapists, requirements can vary by location. For example, the processes for becoming a licensed therapist in Columbus and Corpus Christi licensed therapist education requirements each have specific coursework and supervised clinical experience mandates.

Likewise, prospective counselors should review the licensed therapist requirements in Dallas and the Denver licensed therapist education requirements to ensure they meet local licensing standards. Online degrees can help meet these requirements, offering flexibility for working students. As you plan your studies, research both state regulations and accredited programs to set yourself on the path to a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Swank

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles