World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5593
World Ranking
11252
National Ranking
208

Marc Geilen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Geilen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 207 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marc Geilen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Geilen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Geilen is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record in computer science, focusing on systems design, formal methods, and real-time applications.

The main fields of study for Geilen's research include computer science with a specialization in the following subfields:

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Core research topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

Marc Geilen has contributed to a range of scientific venues, with frequent publications in:

  • IEEE Access
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Geilen include:

  • Partial-Order Reduction for Supervisory Controller Synthesis, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
  • Multi-Angle Fusion for Low-Cost Near-Field Ultrasonic in-Air Gesture Recognition, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Design and management of image processing pipelines within CPS: Acquired experience towards the end of the FitOptiVis ECSEL Project, 2021, Microprocessors and Microsystems
  • Interface Modeling for Quality and Resource Management, 2021, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • Dilate-Invariant Temporal Convolutional Network for Real-Time Edge Applications, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Geilen encompass:

  • Twan Basten
  • Jeroen Voeten
  • Martijn Hendriks
  • Emad A. Ibrahim
  • Michel Reniers

Best Publications

  • SDF^3: SDF For Free

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • Throughput Analysis of Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

    A.H. Ghamarian;M.C.W. Geilen;S. Stuijk;T. Basten

  • A scenario-aware data flow model for combined long-run average and worst-case performance analysis

    B. D. Theelen;M. C. W. Geilen;T. Basten;J. P. M. Voeten

  • Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Multiprocessor resource allocation for throughput-constrained synchronous dataflow graphs

    S. Stuijk;T. Basten;M. C. W. Geilen;H. Corporaal

  • Requirements on the execution of Kahn process networks

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Scenario-aware dataflow: Modeling, analysis and implementation of dynamic applications

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Bart Theelen;Twan Basten

  • Throughput-Buffering Trade-Off Exploration for Cyclo-Static and Synchronous Dataflow Graphs

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • Minimising buffer requirements of synchronous dataflow graphs with model checking

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten;Sander Stuijk

  • An Algebra of Pareto Points

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten;Bart Theelen;Ralph Otten

  • Software/Hardware Engineering with the Parallel Object-Oriented Specification Language

    B. D. Theelen;O. Florescu;M. C. W. Geilen;J. Huang

  • Worst-case performance analysis of synchronous dataflow scenarios

    Marc Geilen;Sander Stuijk

  • On the Construction of Monitors for Temporal Logic Properties

    M.C.W. Geilen

  • Synchronous dataflow scenarios

    Marc Geilen

  • On the discrete Gabor transform and the discrete Zak transform

    Martin J. Bastiaans;Marc C. W. Geilen

  • Latency Minimization for Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

    A.H. Ghamarian;S. Stuijk;T. Basten;M.C.W. Geilen

  • A Predictable Multiprocessor Design Flow for Streaming Applications with Dynamic Behaviour

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Reactive process networks

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Compositionality in synchronous data flow: Modular code generation from hierarchical SDF graphs

    Stavros Tripakis;Dai Bui;Marc Geilen;Bert Rodiers

  • A robust protocol stack for multi-hop wireless body area networks with transmit power adaptation

    Majid Nabi;Twan Basten;Marc Geilen;Milos Blagojevic

  • MoBAN: a configurable mobility model for wireless body area networks

    Majid Nabi;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

Frequent Co-Authors

Twan Basten
Twan Basten Eindhoven University of Technology
Sander Stuijk
Sander Stuijk Eindhoven University of Technology
Henk Corporaal
Henk Corporaal Eindhoven University of Technology
Kees Goossens
Kees Goossens Eindhoven University of Technology
Chen-Khong Tham
Chen-Khong Tham National University of Singapore
Stavros Tripakis
Stavros Tripakis Northeastern University
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
Pieter H. Hartel
Pieter H. Hartel Delft University of Technology
Maurice Heemels
Maurice Heemels Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens up a range of related fields and flexible career options for those interested in computer science. Many universities now offer accelerated programs, so if you want to earn your diploma quickly, consider the fastest computer science degree options available online.

Computer science students often pursue interdisciplinary paths. For instance, an environmental engineering online degree combines technology with sustainability, preparing graduates for growing green tech industries.

Engineering remains a popular and lucrative direction. The cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs make it more affordable than ever to start a career designing everything from robotics to energy systems.

If you have a passion for science and technology, earning an online bachelor's degree in physics can lead to exciting opportunities in research, engineering, and tech-related sectors.

Choosing an online degree gives you the flexibility to tailor your studies to your interests while balancing other commitments. Consider these related fields to expand your career possibilities in technology, engineering, and the sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Geilen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles