World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6483 6294 105 97 283 9088

Twan Basten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Twan Basten between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Twan Basten published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2003. 5 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2003. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Twan Basten: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 9
2002 6
2003 16
2004 5
2005 13
2006 15
2007 8
2008 14
2009 15
2010 13
2011 15
2012 12
2013 14
2014 10
2015 13
2016 15
2017 9
2018 16
2019 15
2020 15
2021 8
2022 4
2023 5
2024 6
2025 4
2026 1
Total 292
Download as CSV

Twan Basten publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Twan Basten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 283 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 283
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Twan Basten D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Twan Basten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Twan Basten is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on several areas within computer science and engineering, with a particular emphasis on real-time systems, embedded design, and formal verification methods.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their research within these broad fields often addresses subfields such as:

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Key topics they have explored are:

  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

Recent publications illustrate the scope and direction of their work, including:

  • Multi-layer multi-rate model predictive control for vehicle platooning under IEEE 802.11p, 2021, Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • A scenario- and platform-aware design flow for image-based control systems, 2020, Microprocessors and Microsystems
  • Schedule Synthesis for Halide Pipelines on GPUs, 2020, ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • Receiver-Sensitivity Control for Energy-Efficient IoT Networks, 2020, IEEE Communications Letters
  • Partial-Order Reduction for Supervisory Controller Synthesis, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Twan Basten collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Marc Geilen
  • Dip Goswami
  • Bram van der Sanden
  • Martijn Hendriks
  • Jeroen Voeten

Their work appears regularly in publication venues such as:

  • IEEE Access
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Microprocessors and Microsystems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine

Best Publications

  • Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;T. Basten

  • SDF^3: SDF For Free

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • Diagnosing workflow processes using Woflan

    Hmw Eric Verbeek;T Twan Basten;van der Wmp Wil Aalst

  • Throughput Analysis of Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

    A.H. Ghamarian;M.C.W. Geilen;S. Stuijk;T. Basten

  • Process Algebra: Equational Theories of Communicating Processes

    J. C. M. Baeten;T. Basten;M. A. Reniers

  • A scenario-aware data flow model for combined long-run average and worst-case performance analysis

    B. D. Theelen;M. C. W. Geilen;T. Basten;J. P. M. Voeten

  • Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Multiprocessor resource allocation for throughput-constrained synchronous dataflow graphs

    S. Stuijk;T. Basten;M. C. W. Geilen;H. Corporaal

  • System-scenario-based design of dynamic embedded systems

    Stefan Valentin Gheorghita;Martin Palkovic;Juan Hamers;Arnout Vandecappelle

  • Inheritance of behavior

    AA Twan Basten;Wmp Wil van der Aalst

  • Requirements on the execution of Kahn process networks

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Scenario-aware dataflow: Modeling, analysis and implementation of dynamic applications

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Bart Theelen;Twan Basten

  • Throughput-Buffering Trade-Off Exploration for Cyclo-Static and Synchronous Dataflow Graphs

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • Branching bisimilarity is an equivalence indeed

    Twan Basten

  • Adaptive workflow

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;T. Basten;H. M. W. Verbeek;P. A. C. Verkoulen

  • Minimising buffer requirements of synchronous dataflow graphs with model checking

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten;Sander Stuijk

  • Life-Cycle Inheritance: A Petri-Net-Based Approach

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Twan Basten

  • Congestion-controlled best-effort communication for networks-on-chip

    J. W. van den Brand;C. Ciordas;K. Goossens;T. Basten

  • Task-level timing models for guaranteed performance in multiprocessor networks-on-chip

    P. Poplavko;T. Basten;M. Bekooij;J. van Meerbergen

  • An Algebra of Pareto Points

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten;Bart Theelen;Ralph Otten

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Geilen
Marc Geilen Eindhoven University of Technology
Sander Stuijk
Sander Stuijk Eindhoven University of Technology
Henk Corporaal
Henk Corporaal Eindhoven University of Technology
Kees Goossens
Kees Goossens Eindhoven University of Technology
Maurice Heemels
Maurice Heemels Eindhoven University of Technology
Chen-Khong Tham
Chen-Khong Tham National University of Singapore
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
H. M. W. Verbeek
H. M. W. Verbeek Eindhoven University of Technology
Sandeep K. Shukla
Sandeep K. Shukla International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open new doors in computer science and related fields. Many students are now choosing flexible study options, such as an accelerated associate degree online. These programs provide foundational skills and allow for a quicker entry into the tech workforce.

For those interested in broadening their expertise, studying business alongside technology is a smart move. Accredited business schools online make it easy to combine computing knowledge with essential business management skills, boosting your career potential.

Affordability is a top concern for many students. There are several options for a cheapest bachelor degree in computer science and related fields. These programs ensure quality education without putting a strain on your finances.

Engineering is another promising career pathway. Choosing an online bachelor's in engineering can provide the technical skills needed for in-demand roles in software, hardware, or systems engineering. Online learning gives you the freedom to balance study with work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Twan Basten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles