World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7909
World Ranking
9204
National Ranking
163

Sander Stuijk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander Stuijk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 207 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sander Stuijk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sander Stuijk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sander Stuijk is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields primarily focused on Computer Science, Engineering, and Medicine, with particular emphasis on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, and Surgery.

The scientist's work covers several advanced and specialized topics, including:

  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Sander Stuijk has contributed to a variety of recent scientific papers published in notable venues, reflecting a breadth of applications and technological approaches. Some of the most cited and recent papers include:

  • "Camera-Based Vital Signs Monitoring During Sleep - A Proof of Concept Study," 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • "Dissecting Tensor Cores via Microbenchmarks: Latency, Throughput and Numeric Behaviors," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • "Towards Continuous Camera-Based Respiration Monitoring in Infants," 2021, Sensors
  • "Multi-camera infrared thermography for infant respiration monitoring," 2020, Biomedical Optics Express
  • "Accelerating Weather Prediction Using Near-Memory Reconfigurable Fabric," 2022, ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Sensors, the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), the Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Collaborations have included numerous coauthors with varying frequencies of joint work, including:

  • Henk Corporaal (21 collaborations)
  • Federico Corradi (8 collaborations)
  • Sherif Eissa (6 collaborations)
  • Sebastiaan Overeem (5 collaborations)
  • Svitlana Zinger (5 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Algorithmic Principles of Remote PPG

    Wenjin Wang;Albertus C. den Brinker;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • SDF^3: SDF For Free

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • A Novel Algorithm for Remote Photoplethysmography: Spatial Subspace Rotation

    Wenjin Wang;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • Exploiting Spatial Redundancy of Image Sensor for Motion Robust rPPG

    Wenjin Wang;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • Throughput Analysis of Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

    A.H. Ghamarian;M.C.W. Geilen;S. Stuijk;T. Basten

  • A scenario-aware data flow model for combined long-run average and worst-case performance analysis

    B. D. Theelen;M. C. W. Geilen;T. Basten;J. P. M. Voeten

  • New principle for measuring arterial blood oxygenation, enabling motion-robust remote monitoring.

    Mjh Mark van Gastel;Sander Sander Stuijk;G Gerard de Haan;G Gerard de Haan

  • Exploring trade-offs in buffer requirements and throughput constraints for synchronous dataflow graphs

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • Multiprocessor resource allocation for throughput-constrained synchronous dataflow graphs

    S. Stuijk;T. Basten;M. C. W. Geilen;H. Corporaal

  • Scenario-aware dataflow: Modeling, analysis and implementation of dynamic applications

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Bart Theelen;Twan Basten

  • Throughput-Buffering Trade-Off Exploration for Cyclo-Static and Synchronous Dataflow Graphs

    S. Stuijk;M. Geilen;T. Basten

  • Motion Robust Remote-PPG in Infrared

    Mark van Gastel;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • New insights into the origin of remote PPG signals in visible light and infrared.

    Andreia V. Moço;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan;Gerard de Haan

  • Minimising buffer requirements of synchronous dataflow graphs with model checking

    Marc Geilen;Twan Basten;Sander Stuijk

  • Robust respiration detection from remote photoplethysmography

    Mjh Mark van Gastel;Sander Sander Stuijk;G Gerard de Haan

  • Predictable mapping of streaming applications on multiprocessors

    Sander Sander Stuijk

  • Robust heart rate from fitness videos.

    Wenjin Wang;Albertus C den Brinker;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • Worst-case performance analysis of synchronous dataflow scenarios

    Marc Geilen;Sander Stuijk

  • A Review of Near-Memory Computing Architectures: Opportunities and Challenges

    Gagandeep Singh;Lorenzo Chelini;Stefano Corda;Ahsan Javed Awan

  • Ballistocardiographic Artifacts in PPG Imaging

    Andreia Vieira Moco;Sander Stuijk;Gerard de Haan

  • Latency Minimization for Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

    A.H. Ghamarian;S. Stuijk;T. Basten;M.C.W. Geilen

  • A Predictable Multiprocessor Design Flow for Streaming Applications with Dynamic Behaviour

    Sander Stuijk;Marc Geilen;Twan Basten

  • NAPEL: Near-Memory Computing Application Performance Prediction via Ensemble Learning

    Gagandeep Singh;Juan Gomez-Luna;Giovanni Mariani;Geraldo F. Oliveira

Frequent Co-Authors

Twan Basten
Twan Basten Eindhoven University of Technology
Henk Corporaal
Henk Corporaal Eindhoven University of Technology
Marc Geilen
Marc Geilen Eindhoven University of Technology
Gerard De Haan
Gerard De Haan Eindhoven University of Technology
Kees Goossens
Kees Goossens Eindhoven University of Technology
Akash Kumar
Akash Kumar TU Dresden
Christoph Hagleitner
Christoph Hagleitner IBM (United States)
Onur Mutlu
Onur Mutlu ETH Zurich
Dimitrios Soudris
Dimitrios Soudris National Technical University of Athens
Peter Marwedel
Peter Marwedel TU Dortmund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree options and career advancements. For those seeking immediate entry into the tech workforce, consider certificate programs that pay well. These certifications are designed for quick completion and can significantly boost employability in specialized tech roles.

If you are looking for a flexible academic path, online associates in computer science or IT can be an effective way to build foundational knowledge, often in just two years. For more advanced study, professionals might explore the quickest masters degree online options, allowing them to earn an advanced credential in as little as one year.

Deciding on the right degree matters—especially as technology evolves. To maximize your career prospects, it's useful to know which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Staying informed about current trends ensures that your education aligns with employer needs and industry growth.

Best Scientists Citing Sander Stuijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles