World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
19354
World Ranking
17287
National Ranking
8663

Sukru Emre publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sukru Emre sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 330 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sukru Emre D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sukru Emre sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sukru Emre is affiliated with Yale University in the United States, contributing extensively to research in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on surgery, hepatology, and transplantation. Their research output includes a significant number of publications related to organ transplantation techniques and outcomes, liver disease and transplantation, and related subfields such as public health and epidemiology.

The main fields of study for Sukru Emre encompass:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, the subfields of study include:

  • Surgery
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Hepatology
  • Transplantation
  • Epidemiology

Their work covers various topics primarily centered on transplantation and liver diseases:

  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Sukru Emre's recent publications provide insight into multiple aspects of liver transplantation and related clinical practices. Notable papers include:

  • Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Malatya Experience and Proposals for Expanded Criteria, 2020, Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • Variation in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States: Identifying Opportunities for Increased Utilization, 2023, Clinical Transplantation
  • The Use of Nondirected Donor Organs in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Perspectives and Guidance, 2021, Hepatology
  • Advances and Innovations in Living Donor Liver Transplant Techniques, Matching and Surgical Training: Meeting Report from the Living Donor Liver Transplant Consensus Conference, 2023, Clinical Transplantation
  • The First 4-Way Liver Paired Exchange from an Interdisciplinary Collaboration Between Health Care Professionals and Design Economists, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Sukru Emre include:

  • AnnMarie Liapakis
  • Sezai Yılmaz
  • Volkan İnce
  • Sami Akbulut
  • Burak Işık

Regarding publication venues, Sukru Emre has an active contribution in journals oriented toward transplant surgery and clinical transplantation:

  • Transplantation Proceedings
  • Clinical Transplantation
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Transplant Infectious Disease

Best Publications

  • Long-term results with multimodal adjuvant therapy and liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 centimeters

    Sasan Roayaie;Jason S. Frischer;Sukru H. Emre;Thomas M. Fishbein

  • Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplant: patterns and prognosis.

    Sasan Roayaie;Jonathan D. Schwartz;Max W. Sung;Sukru H. Emre

  • Severe or multiple rejection episodes are associated with early recurrence of hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation

    Patricia A. Sheiner;Myron E. Schwartz;Eytan Mor;Leona K. Schluger

  • One Hundred Nine Living Donor Liver Transplants in Adults and Children: A Single-Center Experience

    Charles M. Miller;Gabriel E. Gondolesi;Sander Florman;Cal Matsumoto

  • Adherence and medical outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients who transition to adult services

    Rachel A Annunziato;Sukru Emre;Sukru Emre;Benjamin L Shneider;Benjamin L Shneider;Codette Barton

  • Long-term Medical Complications In Patients Surviving ≥5 Years After Liver Transplant

    Patricia A. Sheiner;Joseph F. Magliocca;Carol A. Bodian;Leona Kim-schluger

  • Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients.

    Eyal Shemesh;Benjamin L Shneider;Jill K Savitzky;Lindsay Arnott

  • Use of livers with microvesicular fat safely expands the donor pool

    T M Fishbein;M I Fiel;S Emre;O Cubukcu

  • Critical graft size in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient's disease.

    Menahem Ben-Haim;Sukru Emre;Thomas M. Fishbein;Patricia A. Sheiner

  • Terlipressin Plus Albumin Is More Effective Than Albumin Alone in Improving Renal Function in Patients With Cirrhosis and Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1

    Thomas D. Boyer;Arun J. Sanyal;Florence Wong;R. Todd Frederick

  • Central nervous system complications in liver transplant recipients--incidence, timing, and long-term follow-up.

    David J Bronster;Sukru Emre;Patrizia Boccagni;Patricia A Sheiner

  • Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients.

    Gabriel E. Gondolesi;Giovanni Varotti;Sander S. Florman;Luis Munoz

  • Screening for Wilson disease in acute liver failure: A comparison of currently available diagnostic tests

    Jessica D. Korman;Irene Volenberg;Jody Balko;Joe Webster

  • Safety and efficacy of a single bolus administration of recombinant factor VIIa in liver transplantation due to chronic liver disease.

    Raymond M. Planinsic;Jan van der Meer;Giuliano Testa;Luis Grande

  • The efficacy of prophylactic interferon alfa-2b in preventing recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

    Patricia A. Sheiner;Peter Boros;Franklin M. Klion;Swan N. Thung

  • Adult living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: extending UNOS priority criteria.

    Gabriel E. Gondolesi;Sasan Roayaie;Luis Muñoz;Leona Kim-Schluger

  • Evaluation of the pediatric patient for liver transplantation: 2014 practice guideline by the american association for the study of liver diseases, american society of transplantation and the north american society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition

    Robert H. Squires;Vicky Ng;Rene Romero;Udeme Ekong

  • A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and nonadherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

    Eyal Shemesh;Susan Lurie;Margaret L. Stuber;Sukru Emre

  • Impact of graft type on outcome in pediatric liver transplantation: A report from Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT)

    Ivan R. Diamond;Annie Fecteau;J. Michael Millis;Julian E. Losanoff

  • Expert pediatric opinion on the Report of the Baveno IV Consensus Workshop on Methodology of Diagnosis and Therapy in Portal Hypertension

    Benjamin Shneider;Sukru Emre;Roberto Groszmann;John Karani

Frequent Co-Authors

Myron Schwartz
Myron Schwartz Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Benjamin L. Shneider
Benjamin L. Shneider Baylor College of Medicine
Swan N. Thung
Swan N. Thung Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Robert S. Brown
Robert S. Brown Cornell University
George V. Mazariegos
George V. Mazariegos Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
William M. Lee
William M. Lee The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Andres T. Blei
Andres T. Blei Northwestern University
Robert J. Fontana
Robert J. Fontana University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Raymond T. Chung
Raymond T. Chung Harvard University
Nancy Krieger
Nancy Krieger Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school, there are several flexible online degree options. Many students pursue advanced nursing roles through online MSN programs for non nurses, which allow individuals with a bachelor’s degree in another field to quickly transition to nursing leadership positions.

Entry-level nursing remains highly accessible in the U.S. thanks to the easiest RN program options. These programs typically offer more flexible admission criteria, making it easier for aspiring nurses to get started on their careers.

For those interested in non-clinical roles, medical billing and coding is a rapidly growing field. Many medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid make it possible to start this new career path with minimal upfront costs, making education more accessible.

Additionally, bridge programs like LPN to RN programs without TEAS test requirements help licensed practical nurses (LPNs) advance their qualifications without additional standardized exams.

Best Scientists Citing Sukru Emre

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles