World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
58326
World Ranking
4870
National Ranking
266

Peter Neuhaus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Neuhaus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,537 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Neuhaus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Neuhaus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Neuhaus is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medical sciences with an emphasis on hepatology, oncology, and related fields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several subfields of study including:

  • Hepatology
  • Oncology
  • Epidemiology
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Neuhaus's main areas of work cover key topics such as:

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Throughout their career, Neuhaus has published numerous papers in leading journals. Some of the recent publications include:

  • Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2020), New England Journal of Medicine
  • BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update (2021), Journal of Hepatology
  • Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (2021), Journal of Hepatology
  • Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2022), NEJM Evidence
  • Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An EASL position paper (2021), Journal of Hepatology

The publication venues where Neuhaus has contributed frequently include:

  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Hepatology Communications

Collaborations have been a significant part of Neuhaus's research endeavors. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Christian Labenz
  • Masatoshi Kudo
  • Jörn M. Schattenberg
  • Richard S. Finn
  • Arndt Weinmann

Best Publications

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

    Helmut Oettle;Stefan Post;Peter Neuhaus;Klaus Gellert

  • Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis

    Vincenzo Mazzaferro;Josep M Llovet;Rosalba Miceli;Sherrie Bhoori

  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Long-term Outcomes Among Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer The CONKO-001 Randomized Trial

    Helmut Oettle;Peter Neuhaus;Andreas Hochhaus;Jörg Thomas Hartmann

  • Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.

    Sven Jonas;Wolf O. Bechstein;Thomas Steinmüller;Martin Herrmann

  • Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR)

    René Adam;Vincent Karam;Valérie Delvart;John O'Grady

  • The genetic determinants of the CYP3A5 polymorphism

    Elisabeth Hustert;Michael Haberl;Oliver Burk;Renzo Wolbold

  • Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

    Peter Neuhaus;Sven Jonas;Wolf O. Bechstein;Rüdiger Lohmann

  • Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver.

    Thomas Lang;Kathrin Klein;Joachim Fischer;Andreas K. Nüssler

  • Early enteral supply of lactobacillus and fiber versus selective bowel decontamination: a controlled trial in liver transplant recipients.

    Nada Rayes;Daniel Seehofer;Sonja Hansen;Kathrin Boucsein

  • Supply of pre- and probiotics reduces bacterial infection rates after liver transplantation--a randomized, double-blind trial.

    Nada Rayes;Daniel Seehofer;Tom Theruvath;Reinhold A Schiller

  • Sex is a major determinant of CYP3A4 expression in human liver

    Renzo Wolbold;Kathrin Klein;Oliver Burk;Andreas K. Nüssler

  • Adefovir dipivoxil therapy for lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B in pre– and post–liver transplantation patients

    Eugene R. Schiff;Ching-Lung Lai;Stefanos Hadziyannis;Peter Neuhaus

  • Fibrosis progression after liver transplantation in patients with recurrent hepatitis C.

    Ulf P. Neumann;Thomas Berg;Marcus Bahra;Daniel Seehofer

  • Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial

    Edward K. Geissler;Andreas A. Schnitzbauer;Andreas A. Schnitzbauer;Carl Zülke;Philipp E. Lamby

  • Interindividual variability and tissue-specificity in the expression of cytochrome P450 3A mRNA.

    Ina Koch;Regina Weil;Renzo Wolbold;Jürgen Brockmöller

  • Long-term outcome of liver transplants for chronic hepatitis C: a 10-year follow-up.

    Ulf P. Neumann;Thomas Berg;Marcus Bahra;Gero Puhl

  • New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

    Michelle L. Deoliveira;Richard D. Schulick;Yuji Nimura;Charles Rosen

  • Liver transplantation after organ preservation with normothermic extracorporeal perfusion.

    Michael R. Schön;Otto Kollmar;Stephen Wolf;Harald Schrem

  • Prediction of postoperative outcome after hepatectomy with a new bedside test for maximal liver function capacity.

    Martin Stockmann;Johan F. Lock;Björn Riecke;Karsten Heyne

  • Early enteral supply of fiber and Lactobacilli versus conventional nutrition: a controlled trial in patients with major abdominal surgery

    Nada Rayes;Sonja Hansen;Daniel Seehofer;Andrea Raffaela Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolf O. Bechstein
Wolf O. Bechstein Goethe University Frankfurt
Stefan G. Tullius
Stefan G. Tullius Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bertram Wiedenmann
Bertram Wiedenmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Wilko Weichert
Wilko Weichert Technical University of Munich
Hans-Dieter Volk
Hans-Dieter Volk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Andreas K. Nussler
Andreas K. Nussler University of Tübingen
René Adam
René Adam University of Paris-Saclay
Petra Reinke
Petra Reinke Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien
Rudolf Pichlmayr
Rudolf Pichlmayr Hanover University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Rolf Rossaint
Rolf Rossaint RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in healthcare can open diverse career pathways. For registered nurses seeking career advancement and increased autonomy, adn to np programs online provide accessible bridge programs to become nurse practitioners.

Healthcare administration is in demand. If you want to step into leadership roles without leaving your job, consider earning your master’s with top cahme accredited mha programs. These programs focus on management, finance, and policy, equipping graduates for high-impact positions.

Nutrition science is another fast-growing field. Those interested in food, wellness, or public health maybe want to explore online nutrition degree programs—flexible options that don’t interrupt busy lives.

Nursing professionals with an associate degree can quickly earn their bachelor’s via rn to bsn online without clinicals. These programs are designed for working RNs, offering coursework that can be completed anywhere and on your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Neuhaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles