World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Daniele Pinna

Antonio Daniele Pinna

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
32989
World Ranking
9686
National Ranking
337

Antonio Daniele Pinna publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Daniele Pinna sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 905 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Antonio Daniele Pinna D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Daniele Pinna sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Daniele Pinna is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Surgery and Hepatology as leading subfields. Additional areas of specialization include Epidemiology, Pharmacology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, particularly focusing on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes, Liver Disease and Transplantation, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria, Organ Donation and Transplantation, and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments.

Frequent publication venues for their research include the American Journal of Transplantation, Annals of Surgery, Antibiotics, Journal of Hepatology, and Transplantation.

Antonio Daniele Pinna has contributed to several notable papers, including:

  • Proposal of a New Comprehensive Notation for Hepatectomy, 2021, Annals of Surgery
  • Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion in extended criteria donor liver transplantation-A randomized clinical trial, 2022, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Factors influencing liberation from mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019: multicenter observational study in fifteen Italian ICUs, 2020, Journal of Intensive Care
  • The Gut Microbiota of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19, 2021, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
  • Endothelial damage in septic shock patients as evidenced by circulating syndecan-1, sphingosine-1-phosphate and soluble VE-cadherin: a substudy of ALBIOS, 2021, Critical Care

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Matteo Cescon
  • Matteo Ravaioli
  • Pierluigi Viale
  • Cristiana Laici
  • Federico Pea

Best Publications

  • Metroticket 2.0 Model for Analysis of Competing Risks of Death After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

    Vincenzo Mazzaferro;Carlo Sposito;Jian Zhou;Jian Zhou;Antonio D. Pinna

  • Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial

    Edward K. Geissler;Andreas A. Schnitzbauer;Andreas A. Schnitzbauer;Carl Zülke;Philipp E. Lamby

  • Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of Down‐Staging in Patients Initially Outside the Milan Selection Criteria

    M. Ravaioli;G. L. Grazi;F. Piscaglia;F. Trevisani

  • Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma

    Alessandro Cucchetti;Fabio Piscaglia;Matteo Cescon;Antonio Colecchia

  • 2018 annual report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) – 50‐year evolution of liver transplantation

    René Adam;Vincent Karam;Valérie Cailliez;John G. O Grady

  • Can Current Preoperative Imaging Be Used to Detect Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Matteo Renzulli;Stefano Brocchi;Alessandro Cucchetti;Federico Mazzotti

  • Antibacterial activity of ozonized sunflower oil (Oleozon).

    Leonardo Antonio Sechi;Irene Lezcano;N. Nunez;M. Espim

  • Disease profile and differential diagnosis of hereditary transthyretin-related amyloidosis with exclusively cardiac phenotype: an Italian perspective.

    Claudio Rapezzi;Candida Cristina Quarta;Laura Obici;Federico Perfetto

  • Impact of model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score on prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis

    Alessandro Cucchetti;Giorgio Ercolani;Marco Vivarelli;Matteo Cescon

  • Liver transplantation for "very early" intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: International retrospective study supporting a prospective assessment.

    G. Sapisochin;M. Facciuto;L. Rubbia-Brandt;J. Marti

  • Improvement in perioperative and long-term outcome after surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 440 patients.

    Gennaro Nuzzo;Felice Giuliante;Francesco Ardito;Ivo Giovannini

  • Is portal hypertension a contraindication to hepatic resection

    Alessandro Cucchetti;Giorgio Ercolani;Marco Vivarelli;Matteo Cescon

  • Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients

    Dario Ribero;Antonio Daniele Pinna;Alfredo Guglielmi;Antonio Ponti

  • Metabolic syndrome in liver transplantation: Relation to etiology and immunosuppression

    Giampaolo Bianchi;Giulio Marchesini;Rebecca Marzocchi;Antonio D. Pinna

  • Efficacy of selective transarterial chemoembolization in inducing tumor necrosis in small (<5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas.

    Rita Golfieri;Alberta Cappelli;Alessandro Cucchetti;Fabio Piscaglia

  • Hepatic Resection and Transplantation for Peripheral Cholangiocarcinoma

    F.Adrian Casavilla;J.Wallis Marsh;Shunzaburo Iwatsuki;Satoru Todo

  • Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years.

    Matteo Cescon;Gaetano Vetrone;Gian Luca Grazi;Giovanni Ramacciato

  • Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma under calcineurin inhibitors: reassessment of risk factors for tumor recurrence.

    Marco Vivarelli;Alessandro Cucchetti;Giuliano La Barba;Matteo Ravaioli

  • Analysis of risk factors for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Key role of immunosuppression†

    Marco Vivarelli;Alessandro Cucchetti;Fabio Piscaglia;Giuliano La Barba

  • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management

    Salomone Di Saverio;Federico Coccolini;Marica Galati;Nazareno Smerieri

Frequent Co-Authors

Gian Luca Grazi
Gian Luca Grazi University of Bologna
Fausto Catena
Fausto Catena University of Bologna
Luca Ansaloni
Luca Ansaloni University of Pavia
Fabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia University of Bologna
Andreas G. Tzakis
Andreas G. Tzakis Cleveland Clinic
Stefania Anna Lucia Zanetti
Stefania Anna Lucia Zanetti University of Sassari
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Vincenzo Mazzaferro University of Milan
Luigi Bolondi
Luigi Bolondi University of Bologna
Salomone Di Saverio
Salomone Di Saverio University of Insubria
René Adam
René Adam University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to becoming a healthcare professional in the USA is highly varied, with a range of online degrees and career pathways to consider beyond a traditional medical degree. For those interested in healthcare leadership or administration, a bachelors in health administration can offer foundational skills and open doors to entry-level roles in medical facilities.

Professionals seeking to further their career may explore online mha programs affordable, which provide advanced knowledge and real-world management skills highly valued in hospitals and clinics.

For those focused on advanced practice roles in nursing, there are least expensive dnp programs available online, offering a flexible way to become a Doctor of Nursing Practice and impact patient care at the highest level.

If pharmacy is your passion, pursuing pharm d online programs can provide a direct pathway to becoming a licensed pharmacist, a vital role in healthcare delivery and medication management.

Exploring these online degree options lets you tailor your education to your goals while balancing flexibility, affordability, and career advancement in the U.S. healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Daniele Pinna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles