World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
10392
World Ranking
6427
National Ranking
2865

Kenneth Zeger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Zeger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kenneth Zeger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Zeger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth Zeger is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields and topics.

The main subfields of study for Kenneth Zeger include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The scientist's research themes encompass the following areas:

  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Semigroups and automata theory

Kenneth Zeger has published multiple papers, with a notable concentration in the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory and arXiv (Cornell University). Recent publications include:

  • Competitive Advantage of Huffman and Shannon-Fano Codes, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Hexagonal Run-Length Zero Capacity Region-Part I: Analytical Proofs, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Hexagonal Run-Length Zero Capacity Region-Part II: Automated Proofs, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • The 3/4 Conjecture for Fix-Free Codes With at Most Three Distinct Codeword Lengths, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Competitive Advantage of Huffman and Shannon-Fano Codes, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent coauthor associated with Kenneth Zeger is Spencer Congero, contributing to multiple joint publications.

Throughout their career, Kenneth Zeger has consistently contributed to journals focusing on information theory and related computational topics.

Best Publications

  • Closest point search in lattices

    E. Agrell;T. Eriksson;A. Vardy;K. Zeger

  • Insufficiency of linear coding in network information flow

    R. Dougherty;C. Freiling;K. Zeger

  • Pseudo-Gray coding

    K. Zeger;A. Gersho

  • Learning and design of principal curves

    B. Kegl;A. Krzyzak;T. Linder;K. Zeger

  • Progressive image coding for noisy channels

    P.G. Sherwood;K. Zeger

  • Networks, Matroids, and Non-Shannon Information Inequalities

    R. Dougherty;C. Freiling;K. Zeger

  • Error protection for progressive image transmission over memoryless and fading channels

    P.G. Sherwood;K. Zeger

  • Progressive image coding on noisy channels

    P.G. Sherwood;K. Zeger

  • Competitive learning and soft competition for vector quantizer design

    E. Yair;K. Zeger;A. Gersho

  • Upper bounds for constant-weight codes

    E. Agrell;A. Vardy;K. Zeger

  • Tradeoff between source and channel coding

    B. Hochwald;K. Zeger

  • Globally optimal vector quantizer design by stochastic relaxation

    K. Zeger;J. Vaisey;A. Gersho

  • Six New Non-Shannon Information Inequalities

    R. Dougherty;C. Freiling;K. Zeger

  • On the capacity of two-dimensional run-length constrained channels

    A. Kato;K. Zeger

  • Nonparametric estimation via empirical risk minimization

    G. Lugosi;K. Zeger

  • Rates of convergence in the source coding theorem, in empirical quantizer design, and in universal lossy source coding

    T. Linder;G. Lugosi;K. Zeger

  • Combined forward error control and packetized zerotree wavelet encoding for transmission of images over varying channels

    P.C. Cosman;J.K. Rogers;P.G. Sherwood;K. Zeger

  • Network routing capacity

    J. Cannons;R. Dougherty;C. Freiling;K. Zeger

  • Nonreversibility and Equivalent Constructions of Multiple-Unicast Networks

    R. Dougherty;K. Zeger

  • Unachievability of network coding capacity

    Randall Dougherty;Chris Freiling;Kenneth Zeger

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamas Linder
Tamas Linder Queen's University
Allen Gersho
Allen Gersho University of California, Santa Barbara
Gábor Lugosi
Gábor Lugosi Pompeu Fabra University
Massimo Franceschetti
Massimo Franceschetti University of California, San Diego
Alexander Vardy
Alexander Vardy University of California, San Diego
Pamela C. Cosman
Pamela C. Cosman University of California, San Diego
Michelle Effros
Michelle Effros California Institute of Technology
Erik Agrell
Erik Agrell Chalmers University of Technology
Ram Zamir
Ram Zamir Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options in Computer Science. Many students pursue affordable online MBA programs to develop management and business skills that complement their technical expertise. An MBA can open doors to leadership roles in tech companies or help you launch your own startup.

For those seeking to quickly boost their qualifications, 1 year online masters are an excellent choice. These accelerated programs let you gain advanced knowledge without spending several years in school.

If speed and return on investment are priorities, consider the fastest online degree options that are both time-efficient and financially rewarding. These programs can help you enter the workforce or transition into in-demand tech roles more quickly.

Finally, with the surge in AI technologies, the best online masters in ai can prepare you for roles in this exciting and rapidly growing field. These specialized programs often focus on machine learning, data science, and real-world AI applications.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth Zeger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles