World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
6045
World Ranking
8932
National Ranking
3802

Michael Langberg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Langberg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Langberg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Langberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Langberg is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of computer science and engineering, with a focus on areas such as computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, and artificial intelligence.

Their scholarly contributions include 42 publications in computer science and 25 in engineering. Notable subfields covered by their work include computer networks and communications (25 publications), electrical and electronic engineering (21 publications), artificial intelligence (8 publications), molecular biology (6 publications), and computational theory and mathematics (5 publications).

Langberg's research topics tend to cluster around cooperative communication and network coding, wireless communication security techniques, error correcting code techniques, DNA and biological computing, coding theory and cryptography, cellular automata and applications, and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Michelle Effros, Mira Gonen, Alex Sprintson, Oliver Kosut, and Yihan Zhang. This collaborative network reflects ongoing engagement with peers active in information theory and communications research.

Their publications have appeared in several venues, with significant representation in arXiv (Cornell University) for preprints, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, and Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory.

Recent selected publications of Michael Langberg include:

  • Network Coding Multicast Key-Capacity, 2022, 2022 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)
  • Codes for Adversaries: Between Worst-Case and Average-Case Jamming, 2024, Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory
  • Group Testing on General Set-Systems, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
  • The Capacity of Causal Adversarial Channels, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
  • Reduced-Rank L1-Norm Principal-Component Analysis With Performance Guarantees, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Best Publications

  • Resilient network coding in the presence of Byzantine adversaries

    S. Jaggi;M. Langberg;S. Katti;T. Ho

  • A unified framework for approximating and clustering data

    Dan Feldman;Michael Langberg

  • Resilient Network Coding in the Presence of Byzantine Adversaries

    S. Jaggi;M. Langberg;S. Katti;T. Ho

  • The encoding complexity of network coding

    M. Langberg;A. Sprintson;J. Bruck

  • Approximation Algorithms for Maximization Problems Arising in Graph Partitioning

    Uriel Feige;Michael Langberg

  • The encoding complexity of network coding

    Michael Langberg;Alexander Sprintson;Jehoshua Bruck

  • Realtime classification for encrypted traffic

    Roni Bar Yanai;Michael Langberg;David Peleg;Liam Roditty

  • An Equivalence Between Network Coding and Index Coding

    Michelle Effros;Salim El Rouayheb;Michael Langberg

  • On the Hardness of Approximating the Network Coding Capacity

    Michael Langberg;Alex Sprintson

  • Universal ε-approximators for integrals

    Michael Langberg;Leonard J. Schulman

  • Local graph coloring and index coding

    Karthikeyan Shanmugam;Alexandros G. Dimakis;Michael Langberg

  • Fault Tolerant Spanners for General Graphs

    S. Chechik;M. Langberg;D. Peleg;L. Roditty

  • The RPR 2 rounding technique for semidefinite programs

    Uriel Feige;Michael Langberg

  • On the hardness of approximating the network coding capacity

    M. Langberg;A. Sprintson

  • Correction of adversarial errors in networks

    S. Jaggi;M. Langberg;T. Ho;M. Effros

  • Communicating the Sum of Sources Over a Network

    A. Ramamoorthy;M. Langberg

  • Private codes or succinct random codes that are (almost) perfect

    M. Langberg

  • On the complementary Index Coding problem

    M. A. R. Chaudhry;Z. Asad;A. Sprintson;M. Langberg

  • On the fundamental limits of caching in combination networks

    Mingyue Ji;Ming Fai Wong;Antonia M. Tulino;Jaime Llorca

  • Improved Approximation of MAX-CUT on Graphs of Bounded Degree

    Uriel Feige;Marek Karpinski;Michael Langberg

  • An equivalence between network coding and index coding

    M. Effros;S. El Rouayheb;M. Langberg

  • The RPR2 Rounding Technique for Semidefinite Programs

    Uriel Feige;Michael Langberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle Effros
Michelle Effros California Institute of Technology
Jehoshua Bruck
Jehoshua Bruck California Institute of Technology
Alex Sprintson
Alex Sprintson Texas A&M University
Tracey Ho
Tracey Ho California Institute of Technology
Uriel Feige
Uriel Feige Weizmann Institute of Science
Leonard J. Schulman
Leonard J. Schulman California Institute of Technology
Eitan Yaakobi
Eitan Yaakobi Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
David Peleg
David Peleg Weizmann Institute of Science
Liam Roditty
Liam Roditty Bar-Ilan University
Atri Rudra
Atri Rudra University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech talent grows, many students explore related fields and flexible study options when considering a Computer Science degree in the USA. Online learning has made reputable graduate programs more accessible, letting you study from anywhere while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in the data-driven side of tech, data science programs are a top choice. These programs blend statistics, programming, and analytical skills—qualities in high demand across industries.

If you prefer leadership roles that combine technology with project management, you might consider schools recognized among the best construction management schools. These degrees are especially valuable in sectors where technology is revolutionizing how infrastructure is built.

Advanced business knowledge is also increasingly relevant for tech professionals. For cost-conscious students, affordable online MBA programs can provide a competitive edge without breaking the bank.

If speed is a priority, consider the one year masters programs online. These accelerate your career progression by allowing you to graduate and enter the workforce quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Langberg

Trending Scientists