World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Salomone Di Saverio

Salomone Di Saverio

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13562 12762 519 496 471 30947

Salomone Di Saverio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Salomone Di Saverio between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Salomone Di Saverio published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 28 papers a year. Output peaked at 92 publications in 2021. 43 of the 589 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 92. Peak 92 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 63 publications 2021: 92 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 22 publications
2005 2025

589 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Salomone Di Saverio: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 8
2009 5
2010 7
2011 16
2012 17
2013 15
2014 30
2015 28
2016 38
2017 42
2018 38
2019 35
2020 63
2021 92
2022 62
2023 46
2024 21
2025 22
Total 589
Download as CSV

Salomone Di Saverio publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salomone Di Saverio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 471
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Salomone Di Saverio D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salomone Di Saverio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Salomone Di Saverio is affiliated with the University of Insubria in Italy and has a significant body of research focused on medicine, particularly surgery. Their work spans various subfields including surgery, oncology, emergency medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scholarly output of Salomone Di Saverio covers main topics such as:

  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines" (2020), published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • "Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study" (2020), published in The Lancet
  • "Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in British journal of surgery
  • "2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis" (2020), published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • "2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting" (2020), published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mauro Podda
  • Federico Coccolini
  • Massimo Sartelli
  • Belinda De Simone
  • Luca Ansaloni

The main publication venues for Di Saverio's research are:

  • World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Updates in Surgery
  • Colorectal Disease
  • British journal of surgery
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

In addition to journal articles, Salomone Di Saverio has contributed to book publications, including a volume titled Postinjury Multiple Organ Failure published in 2022 by Springer International Publishing.

Best Publications

  • Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

    Aneel Bhangu;Kjetil Søreide;Kjetil Søreide;Salomone Di Saverio;Jeanette Hansson Assarsson

  • Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines

    Salomone Di Saverio;Salomone Di Saverio;Mauro Podda;Belinda De Simone;Marco Ceresoli

  • 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis

    Ari Leppäniemi;Matti Tolonen;Antonio Tarasconi;Helmut Segovia-Lohse

  • Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery

    Miklosh Bala;Jeffry Kashuk;Ernest E. Moore;Yoram Kluger

  • Wses Jerusalem Guidelines For Diagnosis And Treatment Of Acute Appendicitis

    Salomone Di Saverio;Arianna Birindelli;Micheal D. Kelly;Fausto Catena

  • Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Federico Coccolini;Fausto Catena;Michele Pisano;Federico Gheza

  • The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections

    Massimo Sartelli;Alain Chichom-Mefire;Francesco M. Labricciosa;Timothy Hardcastle

  • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group

    Richard P. G. ten Broek;Pepijn Krielen;Salomone Di Saverio;Federico Coccolini

  • 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections

    Massimo Sartelli;Pierluigi Viale;Fausto Catena;Luca Ansaloni

  • Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

    Federico Coccolini;Giulia Montori;Fausto Catena;Yoram Kluger

  • Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the definitive data of the CIAOW Study

    Massimo Sartelli;Fausto Catena;Luca Ansaloni;Federico Coccolini

  • A retrospective review with long term follow up of 11,400 cases of pure mucinous breast carcinoma

    Salomone Di Saverio;Juan Gutierrez;Eli Avisar

  • 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation

    Michele Pisano;Luigi Zorcolo;Cecilia Merli;Stefania Cimbanassi

  • The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis.

    Salomone Di Saverio;Andrea Sibilio;Eleonora Giorgini;Andrea Biscardi

  • The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines

    Federico Coccolini;Derek Roberts;Luca Ansaloni;Rao Ivatury

  • Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines

    Antonio Tarasconi;Federico Coccolini;Walter L. Biffl;Matteo Tomasoni

  • Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW).

    Massimo Sartelli;Gian L. Baiocchi;Salomone Di Saverio;Francesco Ferrara

  • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management

    Salomone Di Saverio;Federico Coccolini;Marica Galati;Nazareno Smerieri

Frequent Co-Authors

Fausto Catena
Fausto Catena Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena
Luca Ansaloni
Luca Ansaloni University of Pavia
Massimo Sartelli
Massimo Sartelli University of Macerata
Ari Leppäniemi
Ari Leppäniemi University of Helsinki
Ernest E. Moore
Ernest E. Moore University of Colorado Denver
Raul Coimbra
Raul Coimbra Riverside University Health System - Medical Center
Walter L. Biffl
Walter L. Biffl University of California, Irvine
George C. Velmahos
George C. Velmahos Harvard University
Andrew B. Peitzman
Andrew B. Peitzman University of Pittsburgh
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Medicine or healthcare doesn’t always require the traditional, lengthy route. There are numerous online degree programs designed for students seeking alternative or accelerated pathways into the field. One popular option is fast track medical programs, which allow students to begin clinical work much sooner, especially in nursing roles.

Those interested in advanced nursing and mental health might consider an msn to pmhnp online program. This pathway enables registered nurses to quickly specialize as psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners, a field in high demand.

Aspiring healthcare leaders or those interested in the business side of medicine can benefit from earning a healthcare administration degree cost, which is offered at affordable rates online. For graduate-level specialization, options like the cheapest mha online programs help minimize expenses while providing strong preparation for leadership careers in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Choosing the right online degree helps you align your studies with career goals and manage costs effectively in the dynamic healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Salomone Di Saverio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles