World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9394 8814 365 353 713 30066

Robert J. Porte publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert J. Porte between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert J. Porte published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 19.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2009. 46 of the 774 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2009. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 47 publications 2010: 44 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 22 publications
1987 2025

774 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert J. Porte: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 4
1989 5
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 5
1999 3
2000 18
2001 16
2002 10
2003 7
2004 16
2005 15
2006 28
2007 31
2008 24
2009 47
2010 44
2011 37
2012 41
2013 29
2014 41
2015 41
2016 35
2017 27
2018 31
2019 34
2020 36
2021 46
2022 25
2023 21
2024 24
2025 22
Total 774
Download as CSV

Robert J. Porte publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Porte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 713 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 713
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert J. Porte D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Porte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert J. Porte is affiliated with University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in surgery, hepatology, public health, epidemiology, and transplantation.

Their research work covers several key topics, including:

  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Robert J. Porte has a notable publication record in several academic journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • JHEP Reports
  • Liver Transplantation

Recent significant papers include:

  • Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation - A Randomized Trial (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • A multicenter randomized-controlled trial of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for human liver grafts before transplantation (2023, Journal of Hepatology)
  • Expanding controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: statement from an international collaborative (2021, Intensive Care Medicine)
  • Sequential hypothermic and normothermic machine perfusion enables safe transplantation of high-risk donor livers (2022, American Journal of Transplantation)
  • A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation (2021, Journal of Hepatology)

The researcher has collaborated extensively with various colleagues, including:

  • Vincent E. de Meijer
  • Otto B. van Leeuwen
  • Isabel M.A. Brüggenwirth
  • Wojciech G. Polak
  • Ton Lisman

Best Publications

  • Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis

    Laurens A. van der Waaij;Hendrik M. van Dullemen;Robert J. Porte

  • Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: evidence and clinical consequences

    Ton Lisman;Robert J. Porte

  • Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: The ups and downs

    Ton Lisman;Stephen H. Caldwell;Andrew K. Burroughs;Patrick G. Northup

  • The impact of intraoperative transfusion of platelets and red blood cells on survival after liver transplantation.

    Marieke T. de Boer;Michael C. Christensen;Mikael Asmussen;Christian S. van der Hilst

  • Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients.

    Elizabeth B. Haagsma;Arie P. van den Berg;Robert J. Porte;Cornelis A. Benne

  • Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences

    Robert C. Verdonk;Carlijn I. Buis;Robert J. Porte;Eric J. van der Jagt

  • Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation — A Randomized Trial

    Rianne van Rijn;Ivo J. Schurink;Yvonne de Vries;Aad P. van den Berg

  • 2018 annual report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) – 50‐year evolution of liver transplantation

    René Adam;Vincent Karam;Valérie Cailliez;John G. O Grady

  • Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality

    R. F. de Wilde;M. G. H. Besselink;I. van der Tweel;I. H. J. T. de Hingh

  • Report of the Paris consensus meeting on expanded criteria donors in liver transplantation

    François Durand;John F. Renz;Barbara Alkofer;Patrizia Burra

  • Reduced transfusion requirements by recombinant factor VIIa in orthotopic liver transplantation - A pilot study

    Hgd Hendriks;Jtm de Wolf;IJ Klompmaker;RJ Porte

  • The Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index in Liver Transplantation : ET-DRI

    A. E. Braat;J. J. Blok;H. Putter;R. Adam

  • Genome-wide association analysis in primary sclerosing cholangitis identifies two non-HLA susceptibility loci

    Espen Melum;Andre Franke;Christoph Schramm;Tobias J Weismüller

  • Causes and consequences of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation

    Carlijn I. Buis;Harm Hoekstra;Robert C. Verdonk;Robert J. Porte

  • Efficacy and Safety of Antifibrinolytic Drugs in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

    I. Q. Molenaar;N. Warnaar;H. Groen;E. M. TenVergert

  • Biliary complications after liver transplantation: a review.

    Robert C. Verdonk;Carlijn I. Buis;Robert J. Porte;Elizabeth B. Haagsma

  • Ex vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion and Viability Testing of Discarded Human Donor Livers

    S. op den Dries;Negin Karimian;M. E. Sutton;A. C. Westerkamp

  • Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs. late presentation.

    Carlijn I. Buis;Robert C. Verdonk;Eric J. Van der Jagt;Christian S. van der Hilst

  • Platelets induce sinusoidal endothelial cell apoptosis upon reperfusion of the cold ischemic rat liver

    David Sindram;Robert J. Porte;Maureane R. Hoffman;Rex C. Bentley

  • Management of Nonneoplastic Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Liver Transplantation : A Systematic Review

    Kryssia I. Rodriguez-Castro;Robert J. Porte;Elena Nadal;Giacomo Germani;Giacomo Germani

Frequent Co-Authors

Ton Lisman
Ton Lisman University Medical Center Groningen
René Adam
René Adam University of Paris-Saclay
James F. Markmann
James F. Markmann Harvard University
Joost C. M. Meijers
Joost C. M. Meijers University of Amsterdam
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Pierre-Alain Clavien University of Zurich
Rinse K. Weersma
Rinse K. Weersma University Medical Center Groningen
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Martin L. Yarmush
Martin L. Yarmush Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas M. van Gulik
Thomas M. van Gulik University of Amsterdam
Hein Putter
Hein Putter Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and supplementary pathways to studying Medicine in the USA can open up exciting opportunities in healthcare. Professionals can advance their education and careers with a variety of online degrees that are both convenient and cost-effective.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, understanding the cost of mha degree programs is essential. These programs prepare students for management roles without the need for medical school.

Nurses eager to elevate their qualifications may want to look into the cheapest online dnp programs. These Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) options enable RNs to move into advanced clinical or leadership roles while minimizing financial burden.

Students considering the pharmaceutical field should explore pharmd online programs for flexibility in earning a doctorate and becoming licensed pharmacists.

Additionally, technology-focused careers are available through an online bachelor's in health information management, which combines healthcare knowledge with data management skills.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Porte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles