World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
50801
World Ranking
7834
National Ranking
109

Milo A. Puhan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milo A. Puhan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 741 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Milo A. Puhan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milo A. Puhan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Milo A. Puhan is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and is active in medical research with a focus on infectious diseases and respiratory medicine. Their academic output comprises numerous studies, with a specialization in COVID-19 and related health effects.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Estimated Global Proportions of Individuals With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021" (2022, JAMA)
  • "Burden of post-COVID-19 syndrome and implications for healthcare service planning: A population-based cohort study" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Persistent complement dysregulation with signs of thromboinflammation in active Long Covid" (2024, Science)
  • "Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline" (2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)
  • "Long-term Symptoms After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Adolescents" (2021, JAMA)

The frequent collaborators of Milo A. Puhan include:

  • Anja Frei (with 70 joint publications)
  • Jan Fehr (58 joint publications)
  • Dominik Menges (48 joint publications)
  • Tala Ballouz (46 joint publications)
  • Viktor von Wyl (42 joint publications)

Primary publication venues where their work appears most often are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), with 29 publications
  • International Journal of Public Health, 19 publications
  • Swiss Medical Weekly, 12 publications
  • Annals of Surgery, 9 publications
  • British journal of surgery, 9 publications

Milo A. Puhan's main field of study is medicine, with a concentration in subfields such as infectious diseases (114 publications), pulmonary and respiratory medicine (70 publications), clinical psychology (48 publications), neurology (41 publications), and general health professions (39 publications).

Their work covers a range of key topics related to health and disease, including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (106 publications)
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (86 publications)
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (80 publications)
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health (74 publications)
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (60 publications)
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (40 publications)
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies (38 publications)

Best Publications

  • An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation

    Martijn A. Spruit;Sally J. Singh;Chris Garvey;Richard ZuWallack

  • An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Technical Standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease

    Anne E. Holland;Martijn A. Spruit;Thierry Troosters;Milo A. Puhan

  • A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis

    Milo A Puhan;Holger J Schünemann;Mohammad Hassan Murad;Tianjing Li

  • Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Milo A Puhan;Elena Gimeno-Santos;Christopher J Cates;Thierry Troosters

  • The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity.

    Ksenija Slankamenac;Rolf Graf;Jeffrey Barkun;Milo A. Puhan

  • An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease

    Sally J. Singh;Milo A. Puhan;Vasileios Andrianopoulos;Nidia A. Hernandes

  • Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Medications for Type 2 Diabetes: An Update Including New Drugs and 2-Drug Combinations

    Wendy L. Bennett;Nisa M. Maruthur;Sonal Singh;Jodi B. Segal

  • An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Policy Statement: Enhancing Implementation, Use, and Delivery of Pulmonary Rehabilitation

    Carolyn L Rochester;Ioannis Vogiatzis;Anne E Holland;Suzanne C Lareau

  • Expansion of the prognostic assessment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the updated BODE index and the ADO index

    Milo A. Puhan;Milo A. Puhan;Judith Garcia-Aymerich;Martin Frey;Gerben ter Riet

  • Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

    Romina Brignardello-Petersen;Ashley Bonner;Paul E Alexander;Reed A Siemieniuk

  • An official European Respiratory Society statement on physical activity in COPD

    Henrik Watz;Fabio Pitta;Carolyn L. Rochester;Judith Garcia-Aymerich

  • The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Milo A Puhan;Martin Frey;Stefan Büchi;Holger J Schünemann

  • Serotype-specific changes in invasive pneumococcal disease after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction: a pooled analysis of multiple surveillance sites.

    Daniel R. Feikin;Eunice W. Kagucia;Jennifer D. Loo;Ruth Link-Gelles

  • Self-administration and interviewer-administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies

    Milo A Puhan;Michaela Behnke;Martin Frey;Thomas Grueter

  • The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients.

    René Vonlanthen;Ksenija Slankamenac;Stefan Breitenstein;Milo A. Puhan

  • The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD

    M. A. Puhan;M. A. Puhan;M. A. Puhan;D. Chandra;Z. Mosenifar;A. Ries

  • Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD.

    M. A. Puhan;M. J. Mador;U. Held;R. Goldstein

  • Are There Better Guidelines for Allocation in Liver Transplantation? A Novel Score Targeting Justice and Utility in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Era

    Philipp Dutkowski;Christian E. Oberkofler;Ksenija Slankamenac;Milo A. Puhan

  • Determinants and outcomes of physical activity in patients with COPD: a systematic review

    Elena Gimeno-Santos;Anja Frei;Claudia Steurer-Stey;Jordi de Batlle

  • How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis

    Edward J. Mills;John P. A. Ioannidis;Kristian Thorlund;Holger J. Schünemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger J. Schünemann
Holger J. Schünemann Humanitas University
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Pierre-Alain Clavien University of Zurich
Eric B. Bass
Eric B. Bass Johns Hopkins University
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Matthias Bopp
Matthias Bopp University of Zurich
Joan B. Soriano
Joan B. Soriano Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Josep M. Antó
Josep M. Antó Pompeu Fabra University
Michael I. Polkey
Michael I. Polkey National Institutes of Health
Martijn A. Spruit
Martijn A. Spruit Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to become a doctor. Many students are now considering alternative roles in healthcare through flexible and accessible online degree programs. These pathways not only save time and costs but also offer faster routes to in-demand professions.

For those interested in mental health, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs allow qualified nurses to quickly advance and specialize as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners. Alternatively, prospective healthcare leaders can consider health administration degrees online and take advantage of the flexibility these programs provide.

Affordability is crucial for many students. Some of the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs equip graduates with management expertise while minimizing educational debt. Nursing professionals looking for terminal degrees should explore the cheapest dnp program options for advanced clinical and leadership roles.

By considering these related degrees and career pathways, aspiring healthcare professionals can find routes that meet their unique goals, timelines, and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Milo A. Puhan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles