What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Law
- Statistics
His primary areas of study are MEDLINE, Evidence-based medicine, Guideline, Grading and Health care.
His work deals with themes such as Alternative medicine, Quality, Family medicine and Medical education, which intersect with MEDLINE.
His study looks at the relationship between Evidence-based medicine and fields such as Research design, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His work in Guideline addresses subjects such as Intensive care medicine, which are connected to disciplines such as Randomized controlled trial, Observational study, Tuberculosis and Oseltamivir.
His studies in Grading integrate themes in fields like Certainty, Medical physics, Process management and Critical appraisal.
His Health care study incorporates themes from Asthma, Allergy and Quality assurance.
His most cited work include:
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (8386 citations)
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. (5176 citations)
- An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management (4402 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Guideline, MEDLINE, Systematic review, Internal medicine and Evidence-based medicine are his primary areas of study.
Holger J. Schünemann has included themes like Quality, Grading, Health care and Medical education in his Guideline study.
His MEDLINE research includes themes of Quality assurance, Family medicine and Intensive care medicine.
The Systematic review study combines topics in areas such as Health technology, Management science, Applied psychology, Publication bias and Protocol.
His Internal medicine study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Endocrinology and Surgery.
Evidence-based medicine is frequently linked to Evidence-based practice in his study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Guideline (24.63%)
- MEDLINE (23.95%)
- Systematic review (20.54%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Guideline (24.63%)
- Systematic review (20.54%)
- Grading (17.37%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Holger J. Schünemann focuses on Guideline, Systematic review, Grading, MEDLINE and Health care.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Quality, Checklist, Medical education, Evidence-based medicine and Process management in addition to Guideline.
His Systematic review research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Health technology, Applied psychology, Public health, Protocol and Confounding.
His studies deal with areas such as Psychological intervention, Certainty, Quality of evidence and Guideline development as well as Grading.
The various areas that he examines in his MEDLINE study include Venous thromboembolism and Internal medicine, Quality of life.
His Health care study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Asthma and Family medicine.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (1147 citations)
- Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (1147 citations)
- Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (403 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Law
- Statistics
His primary scientific interests are in Systematic review, Guideline, Grading, Meta-analysis and Certainty.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Psychological intervention, Applied psychology, Disease, Public health and Confounding.
His Guideline study combines topics in areas such as Health technology, Health care, Checklist, Stakeholder and Low molecular weight heparin.
He interconnects Pairwise comparison, Econometrics and Scopus in the investigation of issues within Grading.
His research in Certainty intersects with topics in Quality of evidence, Actuarial science, Publication bias and Statistical hypothesis testing.
His primary area of study in MEDLINE is in the field of Evidence-based medicine.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
