World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pablo Alonso-Coello

Pablo Alonso-Coello

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
72596
World Ranking
12877
National Ranking
1206

Pablo Alonso-Coello publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Alonso-Coello sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 413 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Pablo Alonso-Coello D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pablo Alonso-Coello sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pablo Alonso-Coello is affiliated with Cochrane in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

Their work spans a variety of interconnected topics including health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, clinical practice guidelines implementation, health policy implementation science, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, healthcare cost and quality practices, global cancer incidence and screening, and diabetes management and education.

Frequent publication venues for Pablo Alonso-Coello include:

  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Allergy
  • F1000Research
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • BMJ Open

The researcher has collaborated extensively with a number of coauthors including:

  • Carlos Canelo-Aybar
  • Holger J. Schünemann
  • Ena Niño de Guzmán
  • Elie A. Akl
  • Gordon Guyatt

Some of the recently published papers featuring Pablo Alonso-Coello's research include:

  • American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer, 2021, Blood Advances
  • Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma, 2020, Allergy
  • Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess the Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • A Mobile Phone-Based Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Problems in Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PsyCovidApp): Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE - A statement by the GRADE guidance group, 2023, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

    Gordon H Guyatt;Andrew David Oxman;Gunn Elisabeth Vist;Regina Kunz

  • GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Gunn Vist;Regina Kunz

  • GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Regina Kunz;Jan Brozek

  • GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Regina Kunz;James Woodcock

  • GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness

    Gordon H Guyatt;Andrew D Oxman;Regina Kunz;James Woodcock

  • GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Victor Manuel Montori;Gunn Vist

  • GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Shahnaz Sultan;Paul P. Glasziou

  • [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction].

    Pablo Alonso-Coello;Holger J Schünemann;Jenny Moberg;Romina Brignardello-Petersen

  • Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

    P. J. Devereaux;M. T. Chan;P. Alonso-Coello

  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

    J. L. Brożek;E. A. Akl;P. Alonso-Coello;D. Lang

  • Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Carl Heneghan;Alison Ward;Rafael Perera;Clare Bankhead

  • Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

    M. Mrkobrada;M. Mrkobrada;K. Leslie;P. Alonso-Coello;A. Kurz

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes

    Fernando Botto;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Matthew T V Chan;Matthew T V Chan;Juan Carlos Villar

  • GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Nancy Santesso;Mark Helfand

  • GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Kristian Thorlund;Andrew D. Oxman;Stephen D. Walter

  • GRADE guidelines: 11. making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

    Gordon Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Shahnaz Sultan;Jan Brozek

  • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

    Pablo Alonso-Coello;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Andrew D Oxman;Jenny Moberg;Romina Brignardello-Petersen

  • Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

    P. J. Devereaux;Bruce M. Biccard;Alben Sigamani;Denis Xavier

  • Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Per Olav Vandvik;A. Michael Lincoff;Joel M. Gore;David D. Gutterman

  • Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise

    Holger J Schünemann;Wojtek Wiercioch;Itziar Etxeandia;Maicon Falavigna;Maicon Falavigna

Frequent Co-Authors

Elie A. Akl
Elie A. Akl American University of Beirut
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Holger J. Schünemann
Holger J. Schünemann Humanitas University
Reem A. Mustafa
Reem A. Mustafa University of Kansas
Per Olav Vandvik
Per Olav Vandvik University of Oslo
Matthias Briel
Matthias Briel University Hospital of Basel
Andrew D Oxman
Andrew D Oxman Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Philip J. Devereaux
Philip J. Devereaux Population Health Research Institute
Jan Brozek
Jan Brozek McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA doesn’t always mean attending traditional, in-person classes. Innovative online degree programs now make it possible for students to access quality education remotely, making study more affordable and flexible.

For nursing professionals, msn to dnp programs online provide a pathway to advanced clinical roles and leadership positions. Those interested in the pharmacy field may consider online pharmacist programs, which prepare graduates for essential roles as healthcare providers and medication experts.

If you are passionate about health data or administration, a him bachelor's degree online opens doors to careers in managing electronic health records and healthcare compliance. For those seeking a fast entry into the healthcare sector, affordable medical billing and coding programs teach critical skills that support hospitals and clinics nationwide.

These online degrees not only offer flexibility and convenience but can also help you minimize costs and speed up your career advancement in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Pablo Alonso-Coello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles