World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
209456
World Ranking
3508
National Ranking
146

Philip J. Devereaux publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Devereaux sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 477 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip J. Devereaux D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Devereaux sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Disease

His primary scientific interests are in Randomized controlled trial, Surgery, Internal medicine, Perioperative and Family medicine. His Randomized controlled trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Placebo, Clinical trial and Sample size determination. His Surgery study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Relative risk, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Hospitalized patients and Adverse outcomes.

His Revised Cardiac Risk Index study, which is part of a larger body of work in Perioperative, is frequently linked to Risk assessment, bridging the gap between disciplines. The various areas that P.J. Devereaux examines in his Publication bias study include Systematic review and Health care. His work in the fields of Systematic review, such as Meta-Analysis as Topic, intersects with other areas such as Management science.

His most cited work include:

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (8000 citations)
  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (4456 citations)
  • CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (4140 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

P.J. Devereaux mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Surgery, Cardiology and Perioperative. His Internal medicine study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Noncardiac surgery. In his study, Family medicine is inextricably linked to Alternative medicine, which falls within the broad field of Randomized controlled trial.

His work on Orthopedic surgery as part of his general Surgery study is frequently connected to Hip fracture, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His Perioperative study incorporates themes from Stroke and Intensive care medicine. The concepts of his Confidence interval study are interwoven with issues in Meta-analysis and Odds ratio.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (43.54%)
  • Randomized controlled trial (38.14%)
  • Surgery (33.93%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (43.54%)
  • Perioperative (28.23%)
  • Randomized controlled trial (38.14%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

P.J. Devereaux mostly deals with Internal medicine, Perioperative, Randomized controlled trial, Anesthesia and Cardiology. The Perioperative study combines topics in areas such as Hazard ratio, Confidence interval, Meta-analysis, Stroke and Complication. His Meta-analysis research includes themes of Preoperative care, Absolute risk reduction and Coronary artery bypass surgery.

Randomized controlled trial is a subfield of Surgery that P.J. Devereaux studies. P.J. Devereaux combines subjects such as Placebo and Cardiac surgery with his study of Anesthesia. As a member of one scientific family, P.J. Devereaux mostly works in the field of Cardiology, focusing on Noncardiac surgery and, on occasion, Artificial cardiac pacemaker, Medical illness, Primary outcome and Epicardial adipose tissue.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial (57 citations)
  • Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: diagnosis and management (35 citations)
  • Cardiovascular Risk in Men with Prostate Cancer: Insights from the RADICAL PC Study. (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Disease

P.J. Devereaux spends much of his time researching Emergency medicine, Odds ratio, Internal medicine, Observational study and Cardiac surgery. His work deals with themes such as Anesthesia and Prospective cohort study, which intersect with Odds ratio. The Internal medicine study which covers Cardiology that intersects with Etiology.

His research on Observational study often connects related areas such as Randomized controlled trial. His work on Pragmatic trial as part of general Randomized controlled trial study is frequently linked to Chlorhexidine, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His study explores the link between Cardiac surgery and topics such as Atrial fibrillation that cross with problems in Myocardial infarction.

Best Publications

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

    Alessandro Liberati;Douglas G. Altman;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Cynthia Mulrow

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

    Alessandro Liberati;Douglas G Altman;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Cynthia Mulrow

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

    D Moher;A Liberati;J Tetzlaff;D G Altman

  • CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

    David Moher;Sally Hopewell;Kenneth F Schulz;Victor M. Montori

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPRISMA: Explanation and Elaboration

    Alessandro Liberati;Douglas G. Altman;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Cynthia Mulrow

  • Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

    Amit X. Garg;Neill K. J. Adhikari;Heather McDonald;M. Patricia Rosas-Arellano

  • Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial.

    P J Devereaux

  • GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Regina Kunz;Jan Brozek

  • Relationship Between Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery: Toward an Empirical Definition of Hypotension

    Michael Walsh;Philip J. Devereaux;Amit X. Garg;Andrea Kurz

  • Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.

    Ana Carolina Alba;Thomas Agoritsas;Michael Walsh;Steven Hanna

  • Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

    P. J. Devereaux;M. T. Chan;P. Alonso-Coello

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)

    D Moher;A Liberati;A Liberati;J Tetzlaff;D G Altman

  • Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

    Sarah D. McDonald;Ann Malinowski;Qi Zhou;Salim Yusuf;Salim Yusuf

  • Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nicole Simunovic;P.J. Devereaux;Sheila Sprague;Gordon H. Guyatt

  • Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice

    R Brian Haynes;P J Devereaux;Gordon H Guyatt

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes

    Fernando Botto;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Matthew T V Chan;Matthew T V Chan;Juan Carlos Villar

  • Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review

    Victor M. Montori;P. J. Devereaux;Neill K. J. Adhikari;Neill K. J. Adhikari;Karen E. A. Burns;Karen E. A. Burns

  • Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis.

    Mohit Bhandari;P. J. Devereaux;Marc F. Swiontkowski;Paul Tornetta

  • [CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version)]

    David Moher;Sally Hopewell;Kenneth F Schulz;Victor Montori

  • CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials

    K F Schulz;D G Altman;D Moher;D Moher;V Barbour

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Mohit Bhandari
Mohit Bhandari McMaster University
Salim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf McMaster University
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Amit X. Garg
Amit X. Garg University of Western Ontario
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Daniel I. Sessler
Daniel I. Sessler The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Holger J. Schünemann
Holger J. Schünemann Humanitas University
Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary educational routes in healthcare can open new career pathways for students interested in medicine. For those seeking administrative roles within hospitals and clinics, pursuing one of the healthcare administration degrees available online is a flexible and popular option. These programs prepare graduates for leadership and management positions within the healthcare system.

Nurses wanting to broaden their clinical scope and move into advanced practice can benefit from specialized programs like asn to fnp programs, which offer a bridge from an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) to a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) credential. This pathway provides a streamlined approach to advancing in the nursing profession.

Nutrition is another growing area in healthcare. Pursuing an online bs in nutrition enables students to build expertise in dietary science and wellness, which can lead to roles in clinical nutrition, community health, or industry.

For those targeting executive roles, consider cahme accredited mha online programs. These degrees are highly respected in the field and foster advanced skills in healthcare management and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Devereaux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles