World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 138 1827 1699 1042 957 1111 74979

Michael Walsh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Walsh between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Walsh published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 24 papers a year. Output peaked at 89 publications in 2021. 12 of the 1,296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 89. Peak 89 publications in 2021. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 9 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 22 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 25 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 43 publications 2007: 48 publications 2008: 44 publications 2009: 56 publications 2010: 69 publications 2011: 60 publications 2012: 60 publications 2013: 62 publications 2014: 68 publications 2015: 48 publications 2016: 60 publications 2017: 81 publications 2018: 69 publications 2019: 77 publications 2020: 72 publications 2021: 89 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1972 2025

1,296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Walsh: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 9
1984 3
1985 0
1986 2
1987 6
1988 2
1989 4
1990 2
1991 7
1992 7
1993 14
1994 8
1995 9
1996 4
1997 11
1998 12
1999 22
2000 18
2001 24
2002 25
2003 18
2004 20
2005 29
2006 43
2007 48
2008 44
2009 56
2010 69
2011 60
2012 60
2013 62
2014 68
2015 48
2016 60
2017 81
2018 69
2019 77
2020 72
2021 89
2022 4
2023 11
2024 4
2025 8
Total 1,296
Download as CSV

Michael Walsh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Walsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,101–1,120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,111 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54 1,111
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Walsh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Walsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 138
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Walsh is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States, with research focused primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans a range of subfields including Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

Their scholarly contributions explore a diverse array of topics, notably Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders, Ocular Diseases and Behçet's Syndrome, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research.

Michael Walsh's recent publications demonstrate engagement with both neurological and oncological research areas. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Relapse Patterns in NMOSD: Evidence for Earlier Occurrence of Optic Neuritis and Possible Seasonal Variation," 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "The clinical profile of NMOSD in Australia and New Zealand," 2020, Journal of Neurology
  • "MRI Patterns Distinguish AQP4 Antibody Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From Multiple Sclerosis," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Terahertz imaging of human skin pathologies using laser feedback interferometry with quantum cascade lasers," 2023, Biomedical Optics Express
  • "A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome," 2023, Journal of Translational Medicine

The venues where Walsh frequently publishes include UNC Libraries, Pathology, Frontiers in Neurology, Journal of Neurology, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). These reflect a blended interest in clinical and translational medicine alongside experimental and diagnostic research platforms.

Collaboration appears integral to Walsh's research activity, with frequent co-authors including Mark Clendenning, Mark A. Jenkins, Daniel D. Buchanan, John L. Hopper, and Aung Ko Win. Each of these collaborators has co-authored multiple papers, highlighting a consistent network of research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide in ANCA-Associated Renal Vasculitis

    Rachel B. Jones;Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert;Thomas Hauser;Raashid Luqmani

  • Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

    Colin C. Pritchard;Joaquin Mateo;Michael F. Walsh;Navonil De Sarkar

  • Relationship Between Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery: Toward an Empirical Definition of Hypotension

    Michael Walsh;Philip J. Devereaux;Amit X. Garg;Andrea Kurz

  • Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer

    Jinghui Zhang;Michael F. Walsh;Gang Wu;Michael N. Edmonson

  • Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.

    Ana Carolina Alba;Thomas Agoritsas;Michael Walsh;Steven Hanna

  • Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

    P. J. Devereaux;M. T. Chan;P. Alonso-Coello

  • Long-term patient survival in ANCA-associated vasculitis

    Oliver Flossmann;Annelies Berden;Kirsten de Groot;Chris Hagen

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes

    Fernando Botto;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Matthew T V Chan;Matthew T V Chan;Juan Carlos Villar

  • Immunohistochemistry Versus Microsatellite Instability Testing in Phenotyping Colorectal Tumors

    Noralane M. Lindor;Lawrence J. Burgart;Olga Leontovich;Richard M. Goldberg

  • BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum

    T Kambara;L A Simms;V L J Whitehall;K J Spring

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Hypermutant Glioblastoma Multiforme Resulting From Germline Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency

    Eric Bouffet;Valérie Larouche;Brittany B. Campbell;Daniele Merico

  • Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

    Michael Walsh;Peter A Merkel;Chen-Au Peh;Wladimir M Szpirt

  • Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

    Bruce F. Culleton;Michael Walsh;Scott W. Klarenbach;Garth Mortis

  • The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Linda Holmfeldt;Lei Wei;Ernesto Diaz-Flores;Michael Walsh

  • Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

    P. J. Devereaux;Bruce M. Biccard;Alben Sigamani;Denis Xavier

  • Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine for remission maintenance in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Thomas F. Hiemstra;Michael Walsh;Alfred Mahr;Caroline O. Savage

  • High Prevalence of Sessile Serrated Adenomas With BRAF Mutations: A Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

    Kevin J. Spring;Zhen Zhen Zhao;Rozemary Karamatic;Michael D. Walsh

  • The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: A case for a Fragility Index

    Michael Walsh;Michael Walsh;Sadeesh K. Srinathan;Daniel F. McAuley;Marko Mrkobrada

  • Factors Associated with Prolonged Wound Drainage After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

    Vipul P. Patel;Michael Walsh;Bantoo Sehgal;Charles Preston

  • Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Azathioprine for Remission Maintenance in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

    Thomas F. Hiemstra;Michael Walsh;Alfred Mahr;Caroline O. Savage

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne P. Young
Joanne P. Young University of Adelaide
Timothy M. McGloughlin
Timothy M. McGloughlin University of Limerick
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jeremy R. Jass
Jeremy R. Jass Imperial College London
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Mark A. Jenkins
Mark A. Jenkins University of Melbourne
Barbara A. Leggett
Barbara A. Leggett University of Queensland
David Jayne
David Jayne University of Cambridge
Amit X. Garg
Amit X. Garg University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the healthcare industry expands, numerous online degree options are emerging to meet diverse career interests and needs. For registered nurses aiming to advance their careers, exploring the cheapest dnp online programs can be an excellent path to leadership and specialized practice roles. Meanwhile, those interested in pharmaceutical sciences can consider an online doctorate like the online pharmd programs, which offer flexible options for working professionals.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. Tech-savvy individuals may find opportunities in health informatics by earning a health information technology online degree, opening doors to medical records management and health data analysis positions. For those seeking fast entry into the healthcare workforce, reviewing medical billing and coding certification cost can help you find affordable training programs in a field that’s in high demand.

Whether you aim for a clinical or administrative career in medicine, online programs offer accessible pathways to reach your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Walsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles