World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy M. McGloughlin

Timothy M. McGloughlin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7854 7576 31 31 181 4433

Timothy M. McGloughlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy M. McGloughlin between 1970 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy M. McGloughlin published across 51 years, from 1970 to 2020, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2009. 1 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2009. 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1970 2020

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy M. McGloughlin: publications per year, 1970 to 2020
Year Publications
1970 3
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 6
2005 9
2006 13
2007 9
2008 21
2009 28
2010 26
2011 18
2012 9
2013 10
2014 13
2015 4
2016 5
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
Total 192
Download as CSV

Timothy M. McGloughlin publications per year - data summary

  • Timothy M. McGloughlin, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Limerick, has 192 publications recorded across 51 years, from 1970 to 2020.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1970 and the most recent to 2020.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 26 of the 51 years in the span carry no publications at all (1971, 1972, 1973, 1974 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.7 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2016-2020) hold 9 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1970-1986: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 1987-2003: 14 publications (0.8 per year); 2004-2020: 175 publications (10.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Timothy M. McGloughlin publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. McGloughlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 181
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy M. McGloughlin publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Timothy M. McGloughlin, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Limerick, records 181 publications - the 40th percentile of the discipline.
  • 40% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Timothy M. McGloughlin, and about 60% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Timothy M. McGloughlin ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Timothy M. McGloughlin D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. McGloughlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Timothy M. McGloughlin D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Timothy M. McGloughlin, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Limerick, records 39 D-Index - the 24th percentile of the discipline.
  • 24% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Timothy M. McGloughlin, and about 76% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Timothy M. McGloughlin ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Timothy M. McGloughlin is affiliated with the University of Limerick in Ireland. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Materials Science, and Engineering. These fields reflect a multidisciplinary approach to their work that covers both fundamental biological sciences and applied engineering technologies.

The scientist has contributed to several specific subfields, with research outputs in Genetics, Biomaterials, and Biomedical Engineering. Their publications address topics at the intersection of these areas, emphasizing biological materials and their engineered applications.

Timothy's main topics of work include:

  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

One notable paper authored by Timothy was published in 2020 in the IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, titled Insect Ultra-Structures as Effective Physical-Based Bactericidal Surfaces. This publication explores biomimetic approaches inspired by insect ultra-structures for their potential in bactericidal applications.

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Donato Romano
  • Jette Bloemberg
  • Paolo Dario
  • Cesare Stefanini

The primary venue for Timothy's recent scholarly output is the IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, reflecting an emphasis on the integration of biological insights with robotic and bionic engineering solutions.

Best Publications

  • Fibrin: a natural biodegradable scaffold in vascular tissue engineering.

    Faisal M. Shaikh;Anthony Callanan;Eamon G. Kavanagh;Paul E. Burke

  • Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Barry J. Doyle;Anthony Callanan;Paul E. Burke;Paul E. Burke;Pierce A. Grace;Pierce A. Grace

  • A mathematical model to predict the in vivo pulsatile drag forces acting on bifurcated stent grafts used in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

    L. Morris;P. Delassus;M. Walsh;T. McGloughlin

  • 3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta.

    L. Morris;P. Delassus;A. Callanan;M. Walsh

  • New Approaches to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment Engineering Insights With Clinical Gain

    Timothy M. McGloughlin;Barry J. Doyle

  • Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: a review of key influences

    Timothy M. McGloughlin;A.G. Kavanagh

  • A Computational Study of the Magnitude and Direction of Migration Forces in Patient-specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Stent-Grafts

    David S Molony;Eamon G Kavanagh;Prakash Madhavan;Michael T Walsh

  • The impact of long term freezing on the mechanical properties of porcine aortic tissue.

    Siobhan A. O’Leary;Barry J. Doyle;Barry J. Doyle;Tim M. McGloughlin;Tim M. McGloughlin

  • A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Barry J Doyle;Anthony Callanan;Timothy M McGloughlin

  • Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques

    Barry J. Doyle;Aidan J. Cloonan;Michael T. Walsh;David A. Vorp

  • Fluid-structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stent-graft

    David S Molony;Anthony Callanan;Eamon G Kavanagh;Michael T Walsh

  • 3D - Printed Tissue - Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications

    Aidan J. Cloonan;Danial Shahmirzadi;Ronny X. Li;Barry J. Doyle

  • 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: From CT scan to silicone model

    Barry Doyle;L.G. Morris;A. Callanan;P. Kelly

  • ECM-Based Materials in Cardiovascular Applications: Inherent Healing Potential and Augmentation of Native Regenerative Processes

    Anna Valentinova Piterina;Aidan J. Cloonan;Claire L. Meaney;Laura M. Davis

  • The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: Classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties

    Siobhan A O'Leary;Eamon G Kavanagh;Pierce A Grace;Tim M McGloughlin

  • Determining the influence of calcification on the failure properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue.

    Siobhan A. O’Leary;John J. Mulvihill;Hilary E. Barrett;Eamon G. Kavanagh

  • Effects of flat, parabolic and realistic steady flow inlet profiles on idealised and realistic stent graft fits through Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA).

    Liam Morris;Patrick Delassus;Pierce Grace;Fintin Wallis

  • Numerical modelling of Newtonian and non-Newtonian representation of blood in a distal end-to-side vascular bypass graft anastomosis.

    Siobhan O’Callaghan;Michael Walsh;Timothy McGloughlin

  • Determination of coefficient of friction for self-expanding stent-grafts.

    Siddharth Vad;Amanda Eskinazi;Timothy Corbett;Tim McGloughlin

  • Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE FIXATION ACHIEVED BY EACH IMPLANT IN BONE

    F. O’Neill;F. Condon;T. McGloughlin;B. Lenehan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Barry J. Doyle
Barry J. Doyle Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research
David A. Vorp
David A. Vorp University of Pittsburgh
Patrick J. Prendergast
Patrick J. Prendergast Trinity College Dublin
Alan Carr
Alan Carr University College Dublin
Stephen F. Badylak
Stephen F. Badylak University of Pittsburgh
Robert G. Hill
Robert G. Hill Queen Mary University of London
Richard B. Reilly
Richard B. Reilly Trinity College Dublin
Peter A. Huijing
Peter A. Huijing Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John J. O'Connor
John J. O'Connor University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Timothy M. McGloughlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles