World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy M. McGloughlin

Timothy M. McGloughlin

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
4433
World Ranking
7852
National Ranking
31

Timothy M. McGloughlin publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. McGloughlin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Timothy M. McGloughlin D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. McGloughlin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy M. McGloughlin is affiliated with the University of Limerick in Ireland. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Materials Science, and Engineering. These fields reflect a multidisciplinary approach to their work that covers both fundamental biological sciences and applied engineering technologies.

The scientist has contributed to several specific subfields, with research outputs in Genetics, Biomaterials, and Biomedical Engineering. Their publications address topics at the intersection of these areas, emphasizing biological materials and their engineered applications.

Timothy's main topics of work include:

  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

One notable paper authored by Timothy was published in 2020 in the IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, titled Insect Ultra-Structures as Effective Physical-Based Bactericidal Surfaces. This publication explores biomimetic approaches inspired by insect ultra-structures for their potential in bactericidal applications.

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Donato Romano
  • Jette Bloemberg
  • Paolo Dario
  • Cesare Stefanini

The primary venue for Timothy's recent scholarly output is the IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, reflecting an emphasis on the integration of biological insights with robotic and bionic engineering solutions.

Best Publications

  • Fibrin: a natural biodegradable scaffold in vascular tissue engineering.

    Faisal M. Shaikh;Anthony Callanan;Eamon G. Kavanagh;Paul E. Burke

  • Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Barry J. Doyle;Anthony Callanan;Paul E. Burke;Paul E. Burke;Pierce A. Grace;Pierce A. Grace

  • A mathematical model to predict the in vivo pulsatile drag forces acting on bifurcated stent grafts used in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

    L. Morris;P. Delassus;M. Walsh;T. McGloughlin

  • 3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta.

    L. Morris;P. Delassus;A. Callanan;M. Walsh

  • New Approaches to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment Engineering Insights With Clinical Gain

    Timothy M. McGloughlin;Barry J. Doyle

  • Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: a review of key influences

    Timothy M. McGloughlin;A.G. Kavanagh

  • A Computational Study of the Magnitude and Direction of Migration Forces in Patient-specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Stent-Grafts

    David S Molony;Eamon G Kavanagh;Prakash Madhavan;Michael T Walsh

  • The impact of long term freezing on the mechanical properties of porcine aortic tissue.

    Siobhan A. O’Leary;Barry J. Doyle;Barry J. Doyle;Tim M. McGloughlin;Tim M. McGloughlin

  • A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Barry J Doyle;Anthony Callanan;Timothy M McGloughlin

  • Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques

    Barry J. Doyle;Aidan J. Cloonan;Michael T. Walsh;David A. Vorp

  • Fluid-structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stent-graft

    David S Molony;Anthony Callanan;Eamon G Kavanagh;Michael T Walsh

  • 3D - Printed Tissue - Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications

    Aidan J. Cloonan;Danial Shahmirzadi;Ronny X. Li;Barry J. Doyle

  • 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: From CT scan to silicone model

    Barry Doyle;L.G. Morris;A. Callanan;P. Kelly

  • ECM-Based Materials in Cardiovascular Applications: Inherent Healing Potential and Augmentation of Native Regenerative Processes

    Anna Valentinova Piterina;Aidan J. Cloonan;Claire L. Meaney;Laura M. Davis

  • The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: Classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties

    Siobhan A O'Leary;Eamon G Kavanagh;Pierce A Grace;Tim M McGloughlin

  • Determining the influence of calcification on the failure properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue.

    Siobhan A. O’Leary;John J. Mulvihill;Hilary E. Barrett;Eamon G. Kavanagh

  • Effects of flat, parabolic and realistic steady flow inlet profiles on idealised and realistic stent graft fits through Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA).

    Liam Morris;Patrick Delassus;Pierce Grace;Fintin Wallis

  • Numerical modelling of Newtonian and non-Newtonian representation of blood in a distal end-to-side vascular bypass graft anastomosis.

    Siobhan O’Callaghan;Michael Walsh;Timothy McGloughlin

  • Determination of coefficient of friction for self-expanding stent-grafts.

    Siddharth Vad;Amanda Eskinazi;Timothy Corbett;Tim McGloughlin

  • Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE FIXATION ACHIEVED BY EACH IMPLANT IN BONE

    F. O’Neill;F. Condon;T. McGloughlin;B. Lenehan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Barry J. Doyle
Barry J. Doyle Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research
David A. Vorp
David A. Vorp University of Pittsburgh
Patrick J. Prendergast
Patrick J. Prendergast Trinity College Dublin
Alan Carr
Alan Carr University College Dublin
Stephen F. Badylak
Stephen F. Badylak University of Pittsburgh
Robert G. Hill
Robert G. Hill Queen Mary University of London
Richard B. Reilly
Richard B. Reilly Trinity College Dublin
Peter A. Huijing
Peter A. Huijing Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John J. O'Connor
John J. O'Connor University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Timothy M. McGloughlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles