World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard B. Reilly

Richard B. Reilly

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
15980
World Ranking
4114
National Ranking
18

Richard B. Reilly publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Reilly sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 345 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard B. Reilly D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Reilly sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard B. Reilly is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their published work spans a variety of topics centered on neurological disorders, brain function, and related medical fields.

The main fields of study for Richard B. Reilly include Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant work in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The primary research topics covered by their publications encompass:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Richard B. Reilly has published in various scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Movement Disorders
  • Sensors
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology
  • PLoS ONE

Among recent papers, some notable examples include:

  • Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies, 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Use of digital measurement of medication adherence and lung function to guide the management of uncontrolled asthma (INCA Sun): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial, 2023, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and motor responses in individuals with spinal cord injury: A methodological review, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Network Physiology in Aging and Frailty: The Grand Challenge of Physiological Reserve in Older Adults, 2021, Frontiers in Network Physiology
  • MRI Surveillance and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Sequence Variations, 2024, JAMA Oncology

The frequent collaborators in their work include researchers such as Rose Anne Kenny, Clodagh O'Keeffe, Román Romero-Ortuño, Adam H. Dyer, and Michael Hutchinson, indicating a broad network within fields related to neurology and medicine.

Best Publications

  • Automatic classification of heartbeats using ECG morphology and heartbeat interval features

    Philip de Chazal;M. O'Dwyer;R.B. Reilly

  • FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection.

    H. Nolan;R. Whelan;R.B. Reilly

  • Increases in Alpha Oscillatory Power Reflect an Active Retinotopic Mechanism for Distracter Suppression During Sustained Visuospatial Attention

    Simon P. Kelly;Edmund C. Lalor;Edmund C. Lalor;Richard B. Reilly;Richard B. Reilly;John J. Foxe

  • A Patient-Adapting Heartbeat Classifier Using ECG Morphology and Heartbeat Interval Features

    P. de Chazal;R.B. Reilly

  • Steady-state VEP-based brain-computer interface control in an immersive 3D gaming environment

    E. C. Lalor;S. P. Kelly;C. Finucane;R. Burke

  • Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss

    Brian J. Sauser;Richard R. Reilly;Aaron J. Shenhar

  • Automated processing of the single-lead electrocardiogram for the detection of obstructive sleep apnoea

    P. de Chazal;C. Heneghan;E. Sheridan;R. Reilly

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames

    A. Lecuyer;F. Lotte;R.B. Reilly;R. Leeb

  • Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis

    Jiyao Chen;Fariborz Damanpour;Richard R. Reilly

  • The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty

    Jiyao Chen;R.R. Reilly;G.S. Lynn

  • Knowledge management in new product teams: practices and outcomes

    G.S. Lynn;R.R. Reilly;A.E. Akgun

  • Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication

    S.P. Kelly;E.C. Lalor;R.B. Reilly;J.J. Foxe

  • At what time is the cocktail party? A late locus of selective attention to natural speech.

    Alan J. Power;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Emma Jane Forde;Richard B. Reilly

  • A neural mass model of spectral responses in electrophysiology

    Rosalyn J. Moran;Stefan J. Kiebel;Klaas E. Stephan;R. B. Reilly

  • Resolving Precise Temporal Processing Properties of the Auditory System Using Continuous Stimuli

    Edmund C. Lalor;Alan J. Power;Richard B. Reilly;John J. Foxe

  • Visual spatial attention control in an independent brain-computer interface

    S.P. Kelly;E.C. Lalor;C. Finucane;G. McDarby

  • My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing.

    Helen Keyes;Nuala Brady;Richard B. Reilly;John J. Foxe

  • Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury.

    Paul M Dockree;Simon P Kelly;Richard A.P Roche;Michael J Hogan

  • A parametric feature extraction and classification strategy for brain-computer interfacing

    D.P. Burke;S.P. Kelly;P. de Chazal;R.B. Reilly

  • The VESPA: a method for the rapid estimation of a visual evoked potential.

    Edmund C. Lalor;Barak A. Pearlmutter;Richard B. Reilly;Richard B. Reilly;Gary McDarby

  • New Product Development Speed: Too Much of a Good Thing?

    Jiyao Chen;Richard R. Reilly;Gary S. Lynn

  • The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty

    Zvi H. Aronson;Richard R. Reilly;Gary S. Lynn

  • Telephony-based voice pathology assessment using automated speech analysis

    R.J. Moran;R.B. Reilly;P. de Chazal;P.D. Lacy

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund C. Lalor
Edmund C. Lalor University of Rochester
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Robert Whelan
Robert Whelan Trinity College Dublin
Simon P. Kelly
Simon P. Kelly University College Dublin
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin
Rose Anne Kenny
Rose Anne Kenny Trinity College Dublin
Rosalyn J. Moran
Rosalyn J. Moran King's College London
Shane M. O'Mara
Shane M. O'Mara Trinity College Dublin
Gary Donohoe
Gary Donohoe University of Galway
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard B. Reilly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles