World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 75 543 501 62 57 343 18849

Meixue Zhou publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Meixue Zhou between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Meixue Zhou published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2022. 43 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2022. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 18 publications
1997 2025

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Meixue Zhou: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 6
2000 5
2001 0
2002 0
2003 8
2004 11
2005 12
2006 12
2007 18
2008 7
2009 11
2010 9
2011 12
2012 19
2013 15
2014 11
2015 26
2016 20
2017 18
2018 15
2019 22
2020 24
2021 22
2022 34
2023 12
2024 25
2025 18
Total 397
Download as CSV

Meixue Zhou publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meixue Zhou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–345 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 343 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15 343
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Meixue Zhou D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meixue Zhou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28 75
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His primary scientific interests are in Hordeum vulgare, Salinity, Botany, Agronomy and Hordeum. His Hordeum vulgare study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Peroxidase, Reactive oxygen species, Superoxide dismutase and Nutrient. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Abiotic stress, Homeostasis, Positive correlation and Apoplast.

His Botany research includes elements of Biophysics and Efflux. When carried out as part of a general Agronomy research project, his work on Cultivar is frequently linked to work in Water content, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. His Hordeum research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Domestication, Germplasm and Plant physiology.

His most cited work include:

  • Linking stomatal traits and expression of slow anion channel genes HvSLAH1 and HvSLAC1 with grain yield for increasing salinity tolerance in barley (1080 citations)
  • Screening plants for salt tolerance by measuring K+ flux: a case study for barley (368 citations)
  • Root plasma membrane transporters controlling K+/Na+ homeostasis in salt-stressed barley. (358 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Quantitative trait locus, Horticulture, Hordeum vulgare and Salinity. His study in Waterlogging, Cultivar, Resistance, Germplasm and Plant breeding are all subfields of Agronomy. A large part of his Quantitative trait locus studies is devoted to Doubled haploidy.

His studies deal with areas such as Chlorophyll and Homeostasis as well as Hordeum vulgare. His Salinity study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Reactive oxygen species, Shoot and Abiotic component. Meixue Zhou combines subjects such as Biophysics, Efflux and Arabidopsis with his study of Botany.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (50.00%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (27.60%)
  • Horticulture (25.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Quantitative trait locus (27.60%)
  • Genetics (15.91%)
  • Gene (16.56%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Gene, Agronomy and Salinity. Meixue Zhou studies Doubled haploidy which is a part of Quantitative trait locus. He works mostly in the field of Doubled haploidy, limiting it down to topics relating to Chromosome and, in certain cases, Major gene, as a part of the same area of interest.

His Salinity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Oryza sativa, Shoot, Horticulture and Abiotic component. His Horticulture study combines topics in areas such as Halophyte and Efflux. In general Hordeum vulgare, his work in Hordeum is often linked to Water content linking many areas of study.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Root vacuolar Na+ sequestration but not exclusion from uptake correlates with barley salt tolerance. (26 citations)
  • Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity. (19 citations)
  • Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity. (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Botany

His scientific interests lie mostly in Salinity, Gene, Abiotic component, Oryza sativa and Genetics. Meixue Zhou has researched Salinity in several fields, including Agronomy, Shoot, Horticulture and Oxidative stress. His Agronomy research incorporates themes from Quantitative trait locus, Molecular breeding and Stomatal conductance.

The concepts of his Quantitative trait locus study are interwoven with issues in Genetic marker, Fusarium, Locus and Candidate gene. As a part of the same scientific family, Meixue Zhou mostly works in the field of Oxidative stress, focusing on Cultivar and, on occasion, Seedling. His study in the field of Abiotic stress, DNA microarray and Proteomics is also linked to topics like Glucose dehydrogenase.

Best Publications

  • Linking stomatal traits and expression of slow anion channel genes HvSLAH1 and HvSLAC1 with grain yield for increasing salinity tolerance in barley

    Xiaohui Liu;Michelle Mak;Mohammad Babla;Feifei Wang

  • Structure and pasting properties of oat starch

    Meixue Zhou;Kevin Robards;Malcolm Glennie-Holmes;Stuart Helliwell

  • Root plasma membrane transporters controlling K+/Na+ homeostasis in salt-stressed barley.

    Zhonghua Chen;Igor I. Pottosin;Tracey A. Cuin;Anja T. Fuglsang

  • Screening plants for salt tolerance by measuring K+ flux: a case study for barley

    Z Chen;IA Newman;M Zhou;NJ Mendham

  • Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance

    Zhonghua Chen;Tracey A. Cuin;Meixue Zhou;Amanda Twomey

  • Phosphorus Plays Key Roles in Regulating Plants’ Physiological Responses to Abiotic Stresses

    Unknown

  • A high-density consensus map of barley linking DArT markers to SSR, RFLP and STS loci and agricultural traits

    Peter Wenzl;Haobing Li;Jason Carling;Meixue Zhou

  • Potassium and sodium relations in salinised barley tissues as a basis of differential salt tolerance

    Zhonghua Chen;Meixue Zhou;Ian A Newman;Neville J Mendham

  • Modulation of exogenous glutathione in antioxidant defense system against Cd stress in the two barley genotypes differing in Cd tolerance.

    Fei Chen;Fang Wang;Feibo Wu;Weihua Mao

  • Tibet is one of the centers of domestication of cultivated barley

    Fei Dai;Eviatar Nevo;Dezhi Wu;Jordi Comadran

  • Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates

    Unknown

  • Effects of aluminum and cadmium toxicity on growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of two barley genotypes with different Al resistance

    Tianrong Guo;Guoping Zhang;Meixue Zhou;Feibo Wu

  • Aluminium tolerance in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.): physiological mechanisms, genetics and screening methods

    Jun-ping Wang;Harsh Raman;Guo-ping Zhang;Neville Mendham

  • Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice

    Tianxiao Chen;Sergey Shabala;Sergey Shabala;Yanan Niu;Zhong-Hua Chen

  • Evaluating contribution of ionic, osmotic and oxidative stress components towards salinity tolerance in barley

    Getnet Dino Adem;Stuart J Roy;Stuart J Roy;Meixue Zhou;John P Bowman

  • Cell-Type-Specific H+-ATPase Activity in Root Tissues Enables K+ Retention and Mediates Acclimation of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) to Salinity Stress

    Lana Shabala;Jingyi Zhang;Igor Pottosin;Jayakumar Bose

  • Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity.

    S. M. Nuruzzaman Manik;Georgina Pengilley;Geoffrey Dean;Brian Field

  • Molecular approaches unravel the mechanism of acid soil tolerance in plants

    Miao Bian;Miao Bian;Miao Bian;Meixue Zhou;Dongfa Sun;Chengdao Li

  • Growth and physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery

    Jiayin Pang;Meixue Zhou;Neville Mendham;Sergey Shabala

  • High-resolution mapping of the Alp locus and identification of a candidate gene HvMATE controlling aluminium tolerance in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)

    Junping Wang;Harsh Raman;Meixue Zhou;Peter R. Ryan

  • K+ retention in leaf mesophyll, an overlooked component of salinity tolerance mechanism: a case study for barley.

    Honghong Wu;Min Zhu;Lana Shabala;Meixue Zhou

  • Barley responses to combined waterlogging and salinity stress: separating effects of oxygen deprivation and elemental toxicity

    Fanrong Zeng;Fanrong Zeng;Lana Shabala;Meixue Zhou;Guoping Zhang

  • Using QTL mapping to investigate the relationships between abiotic stress tolerance (drought and salinity) and agronomic and physiological traits

    Yun Fan;Sergey Shabala;Yanling Ma;Rugen Xu

  • Linking salinity stress tolerance with tissue-specific Na(+) sequestration in wheat roots.

    Honghong Wu;Lana Shabala;Xiaohui Liu;Elisa Azzarello

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergey Shabala
Sergey Shabala University of Western Australia
Lana Shabala
Lana Shabala University of Tasmania
Zhong-Hua Chen
Zhong-Hua Chen University of Adelaide
Guoping Zhang
Guoping Zhang Zhejiang University
Chunji Liu
Chunji Liu Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Chengdao Li
Chengdao Li Murdoch University
Holger Meinke
Holger Meinke University of Tasmania
Jiayin Pang
Jiayin Pang University of Western Australia
You-Liang Zheng
You-Liang Zheng Sichuan Agricultural University
Peter R. Ryan
Peter R. Ryan Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Meixue Zhou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles