World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
16384
World Ranking
3045
National Ranking
112

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
16646
World Ranking
12346
National Ranking
343

Holger Meinke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger Meinke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 202 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Holger Meinke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger Meinke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Holger Meinke is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and has a research focus within agricultural and biological sciences. Their work centers primarily on plant science, encompassing ecological and agricultural perspectives.

Their research areas span several specialized subfields including plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, general agricultural and biological sciences, global and planetary change, and ecology.

Key topics addressed in their research consist of plant responses to water stress, climate change impacts on agriculture, and rice cultivation and yield improvement. They also explore subjects related to agriculture, land use, rural development, agricultural innovations and practices, innovation and socioeconomic development, as well as agriculture sustainability and environmental impact.

Holger Meinke has published multiple papers with notable recent works including:

  • Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice (2021), published in The Crop Journal
  • Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates (2023), published in Nature Communications
  • The State of the Art in Modeling Waterlogging Impacts on Plants: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know (2020), published in Earth's Future
  • Towards delivering on the sustainable development goals in greenhouse production systems (2021), published in Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Climate change shifts forward flowering and reduces crop waterlogging stress (2021), published in Environmental Research Letters

Their frequent coauthors comprise Meixue Zhou, Matthew Tom Harrison, Ke Liu, Xiaohai Tian, and Yunbo Zhang.

Holger Meinke has contributed to multiple publications in recognized venues including Agricultural Systems, The Crop Journal, Nature Communications, Earth's Future, and Resources Conservation and Recycling.

Best Publications

  • An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation

    B. A. Keating;Ps S. Carberry;Gl L. Hammer;Me E. Probert

  • Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change

    S. Mark Howden;Jean François Soussana;Francesco N. Tubiello;Francesco N. Tubiello;Netra Chhetri

  • The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: Part II—Integrating impacts with adaptive capacity

    R. Nelson;P. Kokic;S. Crimp;P. Martin

  • Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions

    Christopher J. White;Christopher J. White;Henrik Carlsen;Andrew W. Robertson;Richard J.T. Klein

  • Eco-efficient agriculture: concepts, challenges, and opportunities.

    Brian A. Keating;Peter S. Carberry;Prem S. Bindraban;Senthold Asseng

  • Seasonal and Inter-Annual Climate Forecasting: The New Tool for Increasing Preparedness to Climate Variability and Change in Agricultural Planning and Operations

    Holger Meinke;Roger C. Stone

  • Impacts of the Madden-Julian oscillation on Australian rainfall and circulation

    Matthew C. Wheeler;Harry H. Hendon;Sam Cleland;Holger Meinke

  • Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model APSIM

    E. Wang;Mj J. Robertson;Gl L. Hammer;Ps S. Carberry

  • Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis

    Holger Meinke;Rohan Nelson;Phil Kokic;Roger Stone

  • Silver lining to a climate crisis in multiple prospects for alleviating crop waterlogging under future climates

    Unknown

  • The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: Part I - Conceptualising and measuring vulnerability

    R. Nelson;P. Kokic;S. Crimp;H.B. Meinke

  • Beyond climate-smart agriculture: toward safe operating spaces for global food systems

    Henry Neufeldt;Molly Jahn;Bruce M. Campbell;Bruce M. Campbell;John R. Beddington

  • Near-global impact of the Madden-Julian Oscillation on rainfall

    Alexis Donald;Holger Meinke;Brendan Power;Aline de H. N. Maia

  • Adaptation science for agriculture and natural resource management - urgency and theoretical basis

    Holger Meinke;S Mark Howden;Paul C Struik;Rohan Nelson

  • Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice

    Tianxiao Chen;Sergey Shabala;Sergey Shabala;Yanan Niu;Zhong-Hua Chen

  • A sunflower simulation model: I. Model development

    Scott C. Chapman;Graeme L. Hammer;Holger Meinke

  • Modelling global change impacts on wheat cropping in south-east Queensland, Australia

    P.J. Reyenga;S.M. Howden;H. Meinke;G.M. McKeon

  • Potential deep drainage under wheat crops in a Mediterranean climate. I. Temporal and spatial variability

    S. Asseng;I. R. P. Fillery;F. X. Dunin;B. A. Keating

  • Increasing profits and reducing risks in crop production using participatory systems simulation approaches

    H Meinke;W.E Baethgen;P.S Carberry;M Donatelli

  • Rice in cropping systems - modelling transitions between flooded and non-flooded soil environments.

    D.S. Gaydon;D.S. Gaydon;M.E. Probert;R.J. Buresh;H.B. Meinke;H.B. Meinke

  • Providing Seasonal-to-Interannual Climate Information for Risk Management and Decision-making

    Lisa M. Goddard;Y. Aitchellouche;Walter E. Baethgen;M. Dettinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Meixue Zhou
Meixue Zhou University of Tasmania
Sergey Shabala
Sergey Shabala University of Western Australia
Matthew C. Wheeler
Matthew C. Wheeler Bureau of Meteorology
Donald S. Gaydon
Donald S. Gaydon Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Lammert Bastiaans
Lammert Bastiaans Wageningen University & Research
Daniel Rodriguez
Daniel Rodriguez University of Queensland
Enli Wang
Enli Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Brian Keating
Brian Keating University of Queensland
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider related online degrees that complement their knowledge and enhance career opportunities. For those seeking a manageable academic path, programs listed under easy bachelor's degree can provide a solid foundation without overwhelming coursework.

Geology remains a core component of environmental studies, and many reputable geology degrees online offer flexible learning options for students aiming to specialize in earth sciences. These programs blend fieldwork knowledge with technical skills essential for environmental assessment and sustainability projects.

Another dynamic area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in environmental data analysis and resource management. The best GIS undergraduate programs provide hands-on training with mapping technologies that are vital in policy-making and land-use planning.

For those interested in public sector leadership, integrating environmental science expertise with administrative skills through programs like the best online MPA can open doors to impactful roles in government and nonprofit organizations dedicated to environmental protection.

Best Scientists Citing Holger Meinke

Trending Scientists