World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Australia
2023

Scott C. Chapman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott C. Chapman between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott C. Chapman published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 17.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2019. 36 of the 616 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2019. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 14 publications
1990 2025

616 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott C. Chapman: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 8
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 5
1998 3
1999 6
2000 6
2001 10
2002 19
2003 12
2004 20
2005 19
2006 18
2007 23
2008 27
2009 31
2010 28
2011 31
2012 23
2013 26
2014 19
2015 21
2016 39
2017 32
2018 24
2019 40
2020 28
2021 34
2022 12
2023 12
2024 22
2025 14
Total 616
Download as CSV

Scott C. Chapman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott C. Chapman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Scott C. Chapman is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Physics and Astronomy, with a significant emphasis on Astronomy and Astrophysics. Within these areas, their work extends to subfields including instrumentation, nuclear and high energy physics, electrical and electronic engineering, as well as atomic and molecular physics, and optics.

The scientist's research topics encompass a range of astrophysical phenomena and technologies. Key topics include galaxies focusing on their formation, evolution, and phenomena; astronomy and astrophysical research broadly; studies of star formation and astrophysics; stellar, planetary, and galactic studies; radio astronomy observations and technology; gamma-ray bursts and supernovae; and superconducting and terahertz device technology.

Scott C. Chapman has contributed to multiple papers, some of the recent ones are:

  • "An ALMA survey of the SCUBA-2 CLS UDS field: physical properties of 707 sub-millimetre galaxies," 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • "The Complete Redshift Distribution of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies from the SPT-SZ Survey," 2020, The Astrophysical Journal
  • "An ALMA/NOEMA survey of the molecular gas properties of high-redshift star-forming galaxies," 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • "An ALMA survey of the brightest sub-millimetre sources in the SCUBA-2-COSMOS field," 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • "CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope," 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Chapman include:

  • Justin Spilker
  • Ian Smail
  • A. Weiß
  • Manuel Aravena
  • Chian-Chou Chen

The scientist's publications often appear in leading academic venues such as:

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Best Publications

  • An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation

    B. A. Keating;Ps S. Carberry;Gl L. Hammer;Me E. Probert

  • APSIM - Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation

    Dean P. Holzworth;Neil I. Huth;Peter G. deVoil;Eric J. Zurcher

  • Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects

    R. Suzuky Pinto;Matthew P. Reynolds;Ky L. Mathews;C. Lynne McIntyre

  • Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Estimate Specific Leaf Nitrogen of Tropical Maize during Vegetative Growth

    Scott C. Chapman;Hector J. Barreto

  • A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR

    P.A.R. Ade;Y. Akiba;A.E. Anthony

  • Expression profile analysis of the low-oxygen response in Arabidopsis root cultures.

    Erik Jan Klok;Iain W. Wilson;Dale Wilson;Scott C. Chapman

  • SHARC-2 350 Micron Observations of Distant Submillimeter Selected Galaxies

    A. Kovacs;S. C. Chapman;C. D. Dowell;A. W. Blain

  • Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants

    Graeme Hammer;Mark Cooper;François Tardieu;Stephen Welch

  • Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies

    Matthew Reynolds;David Bonnett;Scott C. Chapman;Robert T. Furbank

  • Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index

    G.O. Edmeades;J. Bolaños;S.C. Chapman;H.R. Lafitte

  • Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops

    Graeme L. Hammer;Erik van Oosterom;Greg McLean;Scott C. Chapman

  • Breeding for the future: what are the potential impacts of future frost and heat events on sowing and flowering time requirements for Australian bread wheat (Triticum aestivium) varieties?

    Bangyou Zheng;Karine Chenu;M. Fernanda Dreccer;Scott C. Chapman

  • Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model APSIM

    E. Wang;Mj J. Robertson;Gl L. Hammer;Ps S. Carberry

  • Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype–environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia

    K Chenu;M Cooper;G L Hammer;Ky L Mathews

  • Pheno-Copter: A Low-Altitude, Autonomous Remote-Sensing Robotic Helicopter for High-Throughput Field-Based Phenotyping

    Scott C. Chapman;Torsten Merz;Amy Chan;Paul Jackway

  • The large-scale structure of the halo of the Andromeda Galaxy Part I: global stellar density, morphology and metallicity properties

    Rodrigo A. Ibata;Geraint F. Lewis;Alan W. McConnachie;Nicolas F. Martin

  • A Direct Comparison of Remote Sensing Approaches for High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plant Breeding

    Maria Tattaris;Matthew P. Reynolds;Scott C. Chapman

  • Plant adaptation to climate change—opportunities and priorities in breeding

    Scott C. Chapman;Sukumar Chakraborty;M. Fernanda Dreccer;M. Fernanda Dreccer;S. Mark Howden

  • The shifting influence of drought and heat stress for crops in northeast Australia

    David B. Lobell;Graeme L. Hammer;Karine Chenu;Bangyou Zheng

  • Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat

    Karine Chenu;John Roy Porter;Pierre Martre;Bruno Basso

  • Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits

    S.C. Chapman;G.O. Edmeades

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Karine Chenu
Karine Chenu University of Queensland
David R. Jordan
David R. Jordan University of Queensland
Erik van Oosterom
Erik van Oosterom University of Queensland
Greg J. Rebetzke
Greg J. Rebetzke Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Andrew Borrell
Andrew Borrell University of Queensland
François Tardieu
François Tardieu INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Matthew P. Reynolds
Matthew P. Reynolds International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
M. Fernanda Dreccer
M. Fernanda Dreccer University of Queensland
Shu Fukai
Shu Fukai University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Scott C. Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles