World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
36
Citations
6788
World Ranking
4793
National Ranking
302

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
6128
World Ranking
8178
National Ranking
637

Erik van Oosterom publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik van Oosterom sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 82 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Erik van Oosterom D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik van Oosterom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • APSIM - Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation

    Dean P. Holzworth;Neil I. Huth;Peter G. deVoil;Eric J. Zurcher

  • Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake

    Andrew K. Borrell;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Erik J. van Oosterom

  • Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops

    Graeme L. Hammer;Erik van Oosterom;Greg McLean;Scott C. Chapman

  • Is crop N demand more closely related to dry matter accumulation or leaf area expansion during vegetative growth

    Gilles Lemaire;Erik van Oosterom;John Sheehy;Marie Hélène Jeuffroy

  • Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate.

    Thomas R. Sinclair;Graeme L. Hammer;Erik J. van Oosterom

  • Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns

    Andrew K. Borrell;Erik J. van Oosterom;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli

  • Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems

    Graeme L. Hammer;Scott Chapman;Erik van Oosterom;Dean W. Podlich

  • Morphological and architectural development of root systems in sorghum and maize

    Vijaya Singh;Erik J. van Oosterom;David R. Jordan;Carlos D. Messina

  • Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments

    Graeme L. Hammer;Greg McLean;Scott Chapman;Bangyou Zheng

  • On systems thinking, systems biology, and the in silico plant.

    Graeme L. Hammer;Thomas R. Sinclair;Scott C. Chapman;Erik van Oosterom

  • Crop species present different qualitative types of response to N deficiency during their vegetative growth

    Gilles Lemaire;Erik van Oosterom;Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy;François Gastal

  • Large‐scale GWAS in sorghum reveals common genetic control of grain size among cereals

    Yongfu Tao;Xianrong Zhao;Xuemin Wang;Adrian Hathorn

  • Regulation of tillering in sorghum: environmental effects.

    Hae Koo Kim;Erik van Oosterom;Michael Dingkuhn;Delphine Luquet

  • Sorghum genotypes differ in high temperature responses for seed set

    Vijaya Singh;Chuc T. Nguyen;Erik J. van Oosterom;Scott C. Chapman

  • Genetic Variability and Control of Nodal Root Angle in Sorghum

    Vijaya Singh;Erik J. van Oosterom;David R. Jordan;Colleen H. Hunt

  • Connecting Biochemical Photosynthesis Models with Crop Models to Support Crop Improvement.

    Alex Wu;Youhong Song;Erik J. van Oosterom;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Genetic control of nodal root angle in sorghum and its implications on water extraction

    Vijaya Singh;Erik J. van Oosterom;David R. Jordan;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Designing crops for adaptation to the drought and high‐temperature risks anticipated in future climates

    Graeme. L. Hammer;Greg McLean;Erik van Oosterom;Scott Chapman;Scott Chapman

  • Pre-anthesis ovary development determines genotypic differences in potential kernel weight in sorghum

    Zongjian Yang;Erik J. van Oosterom;David R. Jordan;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Soil water capture trends over 50 years of single-cross maize (Zea mays L.) breeding in the US corn-belt

    Andres Reyes;Carlos D. Messina;Graeme L. Hammer;Lu Liu

  • Whole-Genome Analysis of Candidate genes Associated with Seed Size and Weight in Sorghum bicolor Reveals Signatures of Artificial Selection and Insights into Parallel Domestication in Cereal Crops.

    Yongfu Tao;Emma S. Mace;Emma S. Mace;Shuaishuai Tai;Alan Cruickshank

  • Genetic variability in high temperature effects on seed-set in sorghum

    Chuc T. Nguyen;Vijaya Singh;Erik J. van Oosterom;Scott C. Chapman

  • Regulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects.

    Hae Koo Kim;Delphine Luquet;Erik van Oosterom;Michael Dingkuhn

  • A physiological framework to explain genetic and environmental regulation of tillering in sorghum

    Mohammad Mobashwer Alam;Graeme L. Hammer;Erik J. van Oosterom;Alan W. Cruickshank

  • Development of a phenotyping platform for high throughput screening of nodal root angle in sorghum.

    Dinesh C. Joshi;Vijaya Singh;Colleen Hunt;Emma Mace

  • On the dynamic determinants of reproductive failure under drought in maize

    Carlos D Messina;Graeme L Hammer;Greg McLean;Mark Cooper

  • Hybrid variation for root system efficiency in maize: potential links to drought adaptation

    Erik J. van Oosterom;Zongjian Yang;Fenglu Zhang;Kurt S. Deifel

  • Molecular Breeding for Complex Adaptive Traits: How Integrating Crop Ecophysiology and Modelling Can Enhance Efficiency

    Graeme Hammer;Charlie Messina;Erik van Oosterom;Scott Chapman

  • Genotypic variation in whole-plant transpiration efficiency in sorghum only partly aligns with variation in stomatal conductance.

    Geetika Geetika;Erik J. van Oosterom;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Miranda Y. Mortlock

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
David R. Jordan
David R. Jordan University of Queensland
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Emma S. Mace
Emma S. Mace University of Queensland
Andrew Borrell
Andrew Borrell University of Queensland
Ian D. Godwin
Ian D. Godwin University of Queensland
Karine Chenu
Karine Chenu University of Queensland
Mark E. Cooper
Mark E. Cooper Monash University
Carlos D. Messina
Carlos D. Messina University of Florida
Lee T. Hickey
Lee T. Hickey University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Erik van Oosterom

Trending Scientists