World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark E. Cooper

Mark E. Cooper

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
181
Citations
147840
World Ranking
593
National Ranking
11

Medicine

D-Index
178
Citations
141626
World Ranking
386
National Ranking
10

Mark E. Cooper publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,742 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark E. Cooper D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Cooper sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 178 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Mark E. Cooper is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans over 108 publications in these fields, intersecting significantly with biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, which account for 53 publications.

Cooper's research focuses on plant science and genetics, with notable contributions to agronomy and crop science, molecular biology, and artificial intelligence. Their studies cover multiple subfields including:

  • Plant Science
  • Genetics
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence

The main topics covered in their published work include genetics and plant breeding, genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals, crop yield and soil fertility, genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, greenhouse technology and climate control, wheat and barley genetics and pathology, and climate change impacts on agriculture. These topics are reflected in a diversity of applied and theoretical research projects:

  • Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
  • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

Cooper has published extensively in a number of scientific journals, with frequent appearances in venues known for plant and crop science research. The most common publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Crop Science
  • Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  • Journal of Experimental Botany
  • Frontiers in Plant Science

The scientist's recent papers include the following works:

  • Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment (2020, Nature Plants)
  • Breeding crops for drought-affected environments and improved climate resilience (2022, The Plant Cell)
  • Addressing Research Bottlenecks to Crop Productivity (2021, Trends in Plant Science)
  • Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity (2020, Crop Science)
  • Genetic modification can improve crop yields - but stop overselling it (2023, Nature)

Cooper has collaborated frequently with several researchers in their field, including:

  • Carlos D. Messina
  • Graeme Hammer
  • Carla Gho
  • Owen Powell
  • Tom Tang

In recognition of contributions to health and medical sciences, Cooper was named a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Anushka Patel;Stephen MacMahon;John Chalmers

  • EFFECTS OF LOSARTAN ON RENAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND NEPHROPATHY

    Barry M. Brenner;Mark E. Cooper;Dick De Zeeuw;William F. Keane

  • Structural impact

    Unknown

  • Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications

    Josephine M. Forbes;Mark E. Cooper

  • A Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

    Marc A Pfeffer;Emmanuel A. Burdmann;Chao Yin Chen;Mark E. Cooper

  • Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future

    Steven E Kahn;Mark E Cooper;Stefano Del Prato

  • Oxidative Stress as a Major Culprit in Kidney Disease in Diabetes

    Josephine M Forbes;Melinda T Coughlan;Mark Emmanuel Cooper

  • Bevformer: learning bird's-eye-view representation from lidar-camera via spatiotemporal transformers

    Unknown

  • The role of advanced glycation end products in progression and complications of diabetes

    Su Yen Goh;Mark E. Cooper

  • Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia

    Assam El-Osta;Daniella Brasacchio;Dachun Yao;Alessandro Pocai

  • Proteinuria, a target for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: Lessons from RENAAL

    Dick De Zeeuw;Giuseppe Remuzzi;Hans Henrik Parving;William F. Keane

  • Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at �TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Unknown

  • Albuminuria and Kidney Function Independently Predict Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetes

    Toshiharu Ninomiya;Vlado Perkovic;Bastiaan E de Galan;Bastiaan E de Galan;Sophia Zoungas

  • Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Julio Rosenstock;Vlado Perkovic;Odd Erik Johansen;Mark E. Cooper

  • Albuminuria, a Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy

    Dick De Zeeuw;Giuseppe Remuzzi;Hans Henrik Parving;William F. Keane

  • Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Unknown

  • Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice

    S. Fukai;M. Cooper

  • Diabetic kidney disease

    Merlin C. Thomas;Michael Brownlee;Katalin Susztak;Kumar Sharma

  • Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis.

    Ego Seeman;John L. Hopper;Leon A. Bach;Mark E. Cooper

  • The tubulointerstitium in progressive diabetic kidney disease: more than an aftermath of glomerular injury?

    Richard E. Gilbert;Mark E. Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Josephine M. Forbes
Josephine M. Forbes University of Queensland
Merlin C. Thomas
Merlin C. Thomas Monash University
George Jerums
George Jerums University of Melbourne
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Richard E. Gilbert
Richard E. Gilbert St. Michael's Hospital
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Lyle J. Palmer
Lyle J. Palmer University of Adelaide
Luke A. J. O'Neill
Luke A. J. O'Neill Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways in medicine and healthcare is increasingly popular among students seeking flexibility and rapid career advancement. One frequent question is, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some RN to BSN programs offer coursework that minimizes or exempts traditional clinical requirements, allowing working nurses to balance their education with professional responsibilities.

For those aiming for leadership roles, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs can be pursued online. Students are drawn to dnp programs online that are both accelerated and flexible. Additionally, many seek online dnp programs without clinicals, which reduce time and location barriers and can help busy professionals achieve their goals faster.

Another fast-track option for starting a nursing career is the fast track lpn programs online. These programs provide accelerated learning paths for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly, making them an attractive choice for many graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles