World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard E. Gilbert

Richard E. Gilbert

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11888 11181 477 451 360 25925

Richard E. Gilbert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard E. Gilbert between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard E. Gilbert published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2008. 2 of the 369 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1988 2025

369 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard E. Gilbert: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 2
1994 4
1995 3
1996 8
1997 9
1998 9
1999 6
2000 16
2001 18
2002 15
2003 23
2004 15
2005 10
2006 15
2007 24
2008 25
2009 13
2010 5
2011 22
2012 20
2013 21
2014 16
2015 8
2016 11
2017 8
2018 11
2019 8
2020 9
2021 8
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 369
Download as CSV

Richard E. Gilbert publications per year - data summary

  • Richard E. Gilbert, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, has 369 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988, 2024 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1990, 1992 and 2023).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.9 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 12 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 60 publications (4.6 per year); 2001-2013: 226 publications (17.4 per year); 2014-2025: 83 publications (6.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Richard E. Gilbert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 360 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 360
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard E. Gilbert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Richard E. Gilbert, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, records 360 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Richard E. Gilbert, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Richard E. Gilbert ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Richard E. Gilbert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Gilbert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Richard E. Gilbert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Richard E. Gilbert, a Medicine scholar from St. Michael's Hospital, records 91 D-Index - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Richard E. Gilbert, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Richard E. Gilbert ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Richard E. Gilbert is affiliated with St. Michael's Hospital in Canada. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on various subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Nephrology.

The researcher has contributed to numerous topics, particularly in the areas of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Diabetes Treatment and Management, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer, Heart Failure Treatment and Management, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, and Renin-Angiotensin System Studies.

Richard E. Gilbert's recent publications show engagement with cardiovascular and metabolic research. Notable papers include:

  • Load-independent effects of empagliflozin contribute to improved cardiac function in experimental heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, 2020, Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • Impact of empagliflozin on right ventricular parameters and function among patients with type 2 diabetes, 2021, Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • The impact of empagliflozin on kidney injury molecule-1: a subanalysis of the Effects of Empagliflozin on Cardiac Structure, Function, and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes CardioLink-6 trial, 2020, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Impact of sodium glucose linked cotransporter-2 inhibition on renal microvascular oxygen tension in a rodent model of diabetes mellitus, 2021, Physiological Reports
  • Renal tissue Po2sensing during acute hemodilution is dependent on the diluent, 2020, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

The publications span several respected venues, with multiple contributions to Cardiovascular Diabetology. Other frequent publication venues include Physiological Reports, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, and the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Collaboration has been a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including Kim A. Connelly, Linda Nghiem, Kerri Thai, C. David Mazer, and Golam Kabir. These collaborators have contributed extensively to joint research efforts over numerous papers.

Best Publications

  • The tubulointerstitium in progressive diabetic kidney disease: more than an aftermath of glomerular injury?

    Richard E. Gilbert;Mark E. Cooper

  • Hypertension Canada’s 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children

    Kara A. Nerenberg;Kelly B. Zarnke;Alexander A. Leung;Kaberi Dasgupta

  • Increased renal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGFR-2 in experimental diabetes.

    Mark E. Cooper;Dimitria Vranes;Sherif Youssef;Steven A. Stacker

  • The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.

    Kaberi Dasgupta;Robert R. Quinn;Kelly B. Zarnke;Doreen M. Rabi

  • Independent and Additive Impact of Blood Pressure Control and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade on Renal Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial: Clinical Implications and Limitations

    Marc A. Pohl;Samuel Blumenthal;Daniel J. Cordonnier;Fernando De Alvaro

  • Effect of Empagliflozin on Left Ventricular Mass in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease: The EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Subodh Verma;C David Mazer;C David Mazer;Andrew T Yan;Andrew T Yan;Tamique Mason;Tamique Mason

  • Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension

    Alexander A. Leung;Kara Nerenberg;Stella S. Daskalopoulou;Kerry McBrien

  • Hypertension Canada's 2017 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults

    Alexander A. Leung;Stella S. Daskalopoulou;Kaberi Dasgupta;Kerry McBrien

  • The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 2 – therapy

    Daniel G. Hackam;Nadia A. Khan;Brenda R. Hemmelgarn;Simon W. Rabkin

  • Expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 and type IV collagen in the renal tubulointerstitium in experimental diabetes: effects of ACE inhibition.

    Richard E Gilbert;Allison J Cox;L L Wu;Terri J Allen

  • The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 2 – therapy

    Nadia A. Khan;Brenda Hemmelgarn;Robert J. Herman;Chaim M. Bell

  • Heart failure in diabetes: effects of anti-hyperglycaemic drug therapy

    Richard E Gilbert;Henry Krum

  • Proteinuria and the expression of the podocyte slit diaphragm protein, nephrin, in diabetic nephropathy: effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition.

    Robyn G Langham;Darren J Kelly;Alison J Cox;Napier M Thomson

  • Proximal Tubulopathy: Prime Mover and Key Therapeutic Target in Diabetic Kidney Disease

    Richard E Gilbert

  • Direct Actions of Urotensin II on the Heart: Implications for Cardiac Fibrosis and Hypertrophy

    Alex Tzanidis;Ross D Hannan;Walter G Thomas;Done Onan

  • The (Pro)Renin Receptor: Site-Specific and Functional Linkage to the Vacuolar H+-ATPase in the Kidney

    Andrew Advani;Darren J. Kelly;Alison J. Cox;Kathryn E. White

  • Effect of Empagliflozin on Erythropoietin Levels, Iron Stores, and Red Blood Cell Morphology in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease.

    C. David Mazer;Gregory M.T. Hare;Philip W. Connelly;Richard E. Gilbert

  • Transforming growth factor β1 and renal injury following subtotal nephrectomy in the rat: Role of the renin-angiotensin system

    Leonard L. Wu;Alison Cox;Chris J. Roe;Marie Dziadek

  • Retinal Neovascularization Is Prevented by Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System

    Christina J. Moravski;Darren J. Kelly;Mark E. Cooper;Richard E. Gilbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Darren J. Kelly
Darren J. Kelly Ascension Health
Mark E. Cooper
Mark E. Cooper Monash University
Henry Krum
Henry Krum Monash University
George Jerums
George Jerums University of Melbourne
Carol A. Pollock
Carol A. Pollock University of Sydney
Lawrence A. Leiter
Lawrence A. Leiter University of Toronto
Robert A. Hegele
Robert A. Hegele University of Western Ontario
Pavel Hamet
Pavel Hamet University of Montreal
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Raj Padwal
Raj Padwal University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn't mean you must follow a traditional path. There are several flexible and accessible online degree options for those looking to work in healthcare settings. For instance, if you're interested in the administrative side of healthcare, a medical billing and coding schools online program can lead to in-demand opportunities, often with the added benefit of financial aid.

If patient care is your passion, you may explore nursing schools that don't require teas test, allowing for a smoother application process without standardized exam barriers. For those interested in leadership roles, earning a degree in healthcare administration online can fast-track you into management positions.

Additionally, nurses holding an associate degree can advance their careers through asn to np programs, bridging toward a nurse practitioner role quickly and efficiently. Each pathway offers different entry points and career outcomes, providing diverse options for those eager to join the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Gilbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles