World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 177 678 621 423 378 971 114985
Medicine 183 330 301 207 188 954 120657

Richard J. Johnson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard J. Johnson between 1963 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard J. Johnson published across 64 years, from 1963 to 2026, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2013. 28 of the 1,089 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2013. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 20 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 24 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 28 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 52 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 46 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 46 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 50 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
1963 2026

1,089 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard J. Johnson: publications per year, 1963 to 2026
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 3
1984 2
1985 9
1986 1
1987 2
1988 4
1989 10
1990 6
1991 12
1992 16
1993 12
1994 20
1995 18
1996 16
1997 24
1998 14
1999 24
2000 13
2001 28
2002 26
2003 26
2004 23
2005 31
2006 25
2007 33
2008 36
2009 27
2010 32
2011 34
2012 36
2013 52
2014 44
2015 46
2016 37
2017 35
2018 46
2019 44
2020 50
2021 42
2022 31
2023 37
2024 30
2025 27
2026 1
Total 1,089
Download as CSV

Richard J. Johnson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 954 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 954
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard J. Johnson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 182–183 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 183 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31 183
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Richard J. Johnson is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Surgery, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work spans various topics, including:

  • Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Among the publication venues where Richard J. Johnson has frequently contributed are:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Kidney International
  • Nutrients
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Some of the recent papers associated with their work include:

  • "Hyperuricaemia and gout in cardiovascular, metabolic and kidney disease" (2020), European Journal of Internal Medicine
  • "Fructose and hepatic insulin resistance" (2020), Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
  • "Uric Acid and Hypertension: An Update With Recommendations" (2020), American Journal of Hypertension
  • "Fructose contributes to the Warburg effect for cancer growth" (2020), Cancer & Metabolism
  • "Allopurinol versus usual care in UK patients with ischaemic heart disease (ALL-HEART): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial" (2022), The Lancet

Frequent collaborators noted in their career include:

  • Miguel A. Lanaspa
  • Laura Gabriela Sánchez-Lozada
  • Ana Andrés-Hernando
  • Carlos A. Roncal-Jiménez
  • Bernardo Rodrı́guez-Iturbe

Richard J. Johnson has also contributed to scholarly books, including a publication with Bristol University Press eBooks entitled "US Foreign Policy" published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Uric acid and cardiovascular risk.

    Daniel I. Feig;Duk Hee Kang;Richard J. Johnson

  • Elevated Uric Acid Increases Blood Pressure in the Rat by a Novel Crystal-Independent Mechanism

    Marilda Mazzali;Jeremy Hughes;Yoon Goo Kim;J. Ashley Jefferson

  • Is There a Pathogenetic Role for Uric Acid in Hypertension and Cardiovascular and Renal Disease

    Richard J. Johnson;Duk Hee Kang;Daniel Feig;Salah Kivlighn

  • Hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction.

    Uday M. Khosla;Sergey Zharikov;Jennifer L. Finch;Takahiko Nakagawa

  • A causal role for uric acid in fructose-induced metabolic syndrome

    Takahiko Nakagawa;Hanbo Hu;Sergey Zharikov;Katherine R Tuttle

  • Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease

    Richard J. Johnson;Mark S. Segal;Yuri Sautin;Takahiko Nakagawa

  • A Role for Uric Acid in the Progression of Renal Disease

    Duk Hee Kang;Takahiko Nakagawa;Lili Feng;Susumu Watanabe

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Endogenous fructose production and metabolism in the liver contributes to the development of metabolic syndrome

    Miguel A. Lanaspa;Takuji Ishimoto;Nanxing Li;Christina Cicerchi

  • Evolving importance of kidney disease: from subspecialty to global health burden

    Kai Uwe Eckardt;Josef Coresh;Olivier Devuyst;Richard J. Johnson

  • Hyperuricemia induces a primary renal arteriolopathy in rats by a blood pressure-independent mechanism

    Marilda Mazzali;John Kanellis;Lin Han;Lili Feng

  • Effect of Allopurinol on Blood Pressure of Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Essential Hypertension: A Randomized Trial

    Daniel I. Feig;Beth Soletsky;Richard J. Johnson

  • IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α: Central factors in the altered cytokine network of uremia—The good, the bad, and the ugly

    Peter Stenvinkel;Markus Ketteler;Richard J. Johnson;Bengt Lindholm

  • Uric Acid–Induced C-Reactive Protein Expression: Implication on Cell Proliferation and Nitric Oxide Production of Human Vascular Cells

    Duk Hee Kang;Sung Kwang Park;In Kyu Lee;Richard J. Johnson

  • Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with hepatitis C virus infection

    Richard J. Johnson;David R. Gretch;Hideaki Yamabe;Jaime Hart

  • Uric Acid Stimulates Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Production in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Cyclooxygenase-2

    John Kanellis;Susumu Watanabe;Jinhua Li;Duk Hee Kang

  • Fructose consumption as a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

    Xiaosen Ouyang;Pietro Cirillo;Yuri Sautin;Shannon McCall

  • Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox.

    Yuri Y. Sautin;Richard J. Johnson

  • Adverse effects of the classic antioxidant uric acid in adipocytes: NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative/nitrosative stress

    Yuri Y. Sautin;Takahiko Nakagawa;Sergey Zharikov;Richard J. Johnson

  • Uric Acid, Hominoid Evolution, and the Pathogenesis of Salt-Sensitivity

    Susumu Watanabe;Duk Hee Kang;Lili Feng;Takahiko Nakagawa

  • Effect of Allopurinol on Blood Pressure of Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Essential Hypertension

    Daniel I. Feig;Beth Soletsky;Richard J. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

William G. Couser
William G. Couser University of Washington
Charles E. Alpers
Charles E. Alpers University of Washington
Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe
Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas
Stuart J. Shankland
Stuart J. Shankland University of Washington
Jürgen Floege
Jürgen Floege RWTH Aachen University
Michael J. MacCoss
Michael J. MacCoss University of Washington
Peter Stenvinkel
Peter Stenvinkel Karolinska Institute
David M. Maahs
David M. Maahs Stanford University
Adrian Covic
Adrian Covic Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Hui Y. Lan
Hui Y. Lan Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to many related online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare. If you’re eager to start working in healthcare soon, online medical coding classes with financial aid offer a practical entry point. These programs can quickly prepare you for essential non-clinical roles, making them a popular choice for those needing flexibility and financial support.

Aspiring nurses who want to avoid lengthy admissions processes may consider nursing school without teas test as an accessible route. This option allows students to begin their nursing education without standardized prerequisites, streamlining the path to a rewarding nursing career.

For those interested in leadership positions, healthcare administration degree programs can be completed online and often at an accelerated pace. These programs prepare graduates for management roles within hospitals or clinics, combining business acumen with healthcare expertise.

Registered nurses looking to advance can explore adn to fnp bridge programs. Offered online, they provide a structured, direct path from an Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, expanding clinical skills and career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles