World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11242 10566 5772 5338 519 33687

David M. Maahs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Maahs between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Maahs published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 27.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2018. 43 of the 633 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2018. 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 60 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 49 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 53 publications 2025: 42 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

633 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Maahs: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 4
2005 5
2006 5
2007 8
2008 6
2009 10
2010 16
2011 14
2012 15
2013 21
2014 37
2015 31
2016 36
2017 41
2018 60
2019 35
2020 55
2021 47
2022 49
2023 42
2024 53
2025 42
2026 1
Total 633
Download as CSV

David M. Maahs publications per year - data summary

  • David M. Maahs, a Medicine scholar from Stanford University, has 633 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 60 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2026, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 27.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 27.5 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 187 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 68 publications (8.5 per year); 2012-2019: 276 publications (34.5 per year); 2020-2026: 289 publications (41.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

David M. Maahs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Maahs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 519 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 519
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Maahs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • David M. Maahs, a Medicine scholar from Stanford University, records 519 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than David M. Maahs, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and David M. Maahs ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

David M. Maahs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Maahs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

David M. Maahs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • David M. Maahs, a Medicine scholar from Stanford University, records 92 D-Index - the 45th percentile of the discipline.
  • 45% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than David M. Maahs, and about 55% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and David M. Maahs ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

David M. Maahs is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary research focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a notable emphasis on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism among other subfields.

The major areas covered by their research include Diabetes Management and Research, Diabetes and associated disorders, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Diabetes Treatment and Management, Diabetes Management and Education, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, and Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients.

Among the frequently published venues for their work are Diabetes, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Diabetes Care, UNC Libraries, and The Journal of Pediatrics.

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement, 2022, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice, 2022, Endocrine Reviews
  • A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA1c in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison, 2020, Diabetes Care
  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes, 2022, Pediatric Diabetes

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Ananta Addala
  • Priya Prahalad
  • Korey K. Hood
  • Dessi P. Zaharieva
  • David Scheinker

David M. Maahs also has contributions in book publications, notably with Frontiers Media, where they authored a book titled Developing Strategies to Improve Diabetes Management in College-Going Young Adults, published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    Thomas Danne;Revital Nimri;Tadej Battelino;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018

    Nicole C Foster;Roy W Beck;Kellee M Miller;Mark A Clements

  • Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry

    Kellee M. Miller;Nicole C. Foster;Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes.

    David M. Maahs;Nancy A. West;Jean M. Lawrence;Elizabeth Jane Mayer-Davis

  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes

    Linda A. DiMeglio;Carlo L. Acerini;Ethel Codner;Maria E. Craig

  • Update: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Joseph T. Flynn;Stephen R. Daniels;Laura L. Hayman;David M. Maahs

  • Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Jane L. Chiang;David M. Maahs;Katharine C. Garvey;Korey K. Hood

  • Most Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry Do Not Meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Guidelines

    Jamie R. Wood;Kellee M. Miller;David M. Maahs;Roy W. Beck

  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes.

    Marian J Rewers;Kuben Pillay;Carine de Beaufort;Maria E Craig

  • Low Plasma Adiponectin Levels Predict Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification

    David M. Maahs;Lorraine G. Ogden;Gregory L. Kinney;Paul Wadwa

  • Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Participants in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry

    Jenise C. Wong;Nicole C. Foster;David M. Maahs;Dan Raghinaru

  • Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

    Ruth S Weinstock;Dongyuan Xing;David M Maahs;Aaron Michels

  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes

    A. Doria;A. T. Galecki;C. Spino;R. Pop-Busui

  • Childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease: links and prevention strategies

    Kristen J. Nadeau;David M. Maahs;Stephen R. Daniels;Robert H. Eckel

  • Use of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and its impact on metabolic control: comparison of results from three large, transatlantic paediatric registries.

    Jennifer L. Sherr;Julia M. Hermann;Fiona Campbell;Nicole C. Foster

  • Assessing weight-related quality of life in adolescents.

    Ronette L. Kolotkin;Ronette L. Kolotkin;Meg Zeller;Avani C. Modi;Gregory P. Samsa

  • Insulin delivery methods: Past, present and future

    Rima B Shah;Manhar Patel;David M Maahs;Viral N Shah

  • Insulin Resistance, Defective Insulin-Mediated Fatty Acid Suppression, and Coronary Artery Calcification in Subjects With and Without Type 1 Diabetes: The CACTI Study

    Irene E. Schauer;Janet K. Snell-Bergeon;Bryan C. Bergman;David M. Maahs

  • Diagnosis and Prediction of CKD Progression by Assessment of Urinary Peptides

    Joost P. Schanstra;Petra Zürbig;Alaa Alkhalaf;Angel Argiles

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative.

    Daniel J. DeSalvo;Kellee M. Miller;Julia M. Hermann;David M. Maahs

Frequent Co-Authors

Marian Rewers
Marian Rewers University of Colorado Denver
Bruce A. Buckingham
Bruce A. Buckingham Stanford University
Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis
Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Korey K. Hood
Korey K. Hood Stanford University
Dana Dabelea
Dana Dabelea University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Robert H. Eckel
Robert H. Eckel University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Richard J. Johnson
Richard J. Johnson University of Colorado Denver
Maria E. Craig
Maria E. Craig University of New South Wales
Peter Rossing
Peter Rossing University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and career paths that can complement or accelerate your journey. Rapid changes in healthcare have made flexible, specialized education more accessible than ever.

For those interested in mental health, pursuing a fast track mental health nursing degree online enables you to qualify for rewarding roles quickly. Alternatively, if you’re passionate about healthcare leadership, a bachelors in healthcare administration can open doors to management positions within clinics and hospitals.

Aspiring administrators seeking advanced roles might consider cheap mha programs, which deliver high-value credentials at lower costs. For nurses aiming for the highest level of practice, there are also excellent opportunities in the best dnp programs online.

Exploring these options can help you tailor your education to meet your career goals and adapt to the evolving needs of the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Maahs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles