World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
33687
World Ranking
11243
National Ranking
5773

David M. Maahs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Maahs sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 519 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David M. Maahs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Maahs sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Maahs is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary research focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a notable emphasis on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism among other subfields.

The major areas covered by their research include Diabetes Management and Research, Diabetes and associated disorders, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Diabetes Treatment and Management, Diabetes Management and Education, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, and Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients.

Among the frequently published venues for their work are Diabetes, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Diabetes Care, UNC Libraries, and The Journal of Pediatrics.

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement, 2022, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice, 2022, Endocrine Reviews
  • A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA1c in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison, 2020, Diabetes Care
  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes, 2022, Pediatric Diabetes

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Ananta Addala
  • Priya Prahalad
  • Korey K. Hood
  • Dessi P. Zaharieva
  • David Scheinker

David M. Maahs also has contributions in book publications, notably with Frontiers Media, where they authored a book titled Developing Strategies to Improve Diabetes Management in College-Going Young Adults, published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    Thomas Danne;Revital Nimri;Tadej Battelino;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018

    Nicole C Foster;Roy W Beck;Kellee M Miller;Mark A Clements

  • Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry

    Kellee M. Miller;Nicole C. Foster;Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes.

    David M. Maahs;Nancy A. West;Jean M. Lawrence;Elizabeth Jane Mayer-Davis

  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes

    Linda A. DiMeglio;Carlo L. Acerini;Ethel Codner;Maria E. Craig

  • Update: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Joseph T. Flynn;Stephen R. Daniels;Laura L. Hayman;David M. Maahs

  • Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Jane L. Chiang;David M. Maahs;Katharine C. Garvey;Korey K. Hood

  • Most Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry Do Not Meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Guidelines

    Jamie R. Wood;Kellee M. Miller;David M. Maahs;Roy W. Beck

  • ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes.

    Marian J Rewers;Kuben Pillay;Carine de Beaufort;Maria E Craig

  • Low Plasma Adiponectin Levels Predict Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification

    David M. Maahs;Lorraine G. Ogden;Gregory L. Kinney;Paul Wadwa

  • Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Participants in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry

    Jenise C. Wong;Nicole C. Foster;David M. Maahs;Dan Raghinaru

  • Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

    Ruth S Weinstock;Dongyuan Xing;David M Maahs;Aaron Michels

  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes

    A. Doria;A. T. Galecki;C. Spino;R. Pop-Busui

  • Childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease: links and prevention strategies

    Kristen J. Nadeau;David M. Maahs;Stephen R. Daniels;Robert H. Eckel

  • Use of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and its impact on metabolic control: comparison of results from three large, transatlantic paediatric registries.

    Jennifer L. Sherr;Julia M. Hermann;Fiona Campbell;Nicole C. Foster

  • Assessing weight-related quality of life in adolescents.

    Ronette L. Kolotkin;Ronette L. Kolotkin;Meg Zeller;Avani C. Modi;Gregory P. Samsa

  • Insulin delivery methods: Past, present and future

    Rima B Shah;Manhar Patel;David M Maahs;Viral N Shah

  • Insulin Resistance, Defective Insulin-Mediated Fatty Acid Suppression, and Coronary Artery Calcification in Subjects With and Without Type 1 Diabetes: The CACTI Study

    Irene E. Schauer;Janet K. Snell-Bergeon;Bryan C. Bergman;David M. Maahs

  • Diagnosis and Prediction of CKD Progression by Assessment of Urinary Peptides

    Joost P. Schanstra;Petra Zürbig;Alaa Alkhalaf;Angel Argiles

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative.

    Daniel J. DeSalvo;Kellee M. Miller;Julia M. Hermann;David M. Maahs

Frequent Co-Authors

Marian Rewers
Marian Rewers University of Colorado Denver
Bruce A. Buckingham
Bruce A. Buckingham Stanford University
Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis
Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Korey K. Hood
Korey K. Hood Stanford University
Dana Dabelea
Dana Dabelea University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Robert H. Eckel
Robert H. Eckel University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Richard J. Johnson
Richard J. Johnson University of Colorado Denver
Maria E. Craig
Maria E. Craig University of New South Wales
Peter Rossing
Peter Rossing University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and career paths that can complement or accelerate your journey. Rapid changes in healthcare have made flexible, specialized education more accessible than ever.

For those interested in mental health, pursuing a fast track mental health nursing degree online enables you to qualify for rewarding roles quickly. Alternatively, if you’re passionate about healthcare leadership, a bachelors in healthcare administration can open doors to management positions within clinics and hospitals.

Aspiring administrators seeking advanced roles might consider cheap mha programs, which deliver high-value credentials at lower costs. For nurses aiming for the highest level of practice, there are also excellent opportunities in the best dnp programs online.

Exploring these options can help you tailor your education to meet your career goals and adapt to the evolving needs of the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Maahs

Trending Scientists