World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
42008
World Ranking
3942
National Ranking
2160

Roy W. Beck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy W. Beck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 415 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roy W. Beck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy W. Beck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roy W. Beck is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research is primarily grounded in the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism. Within these areas, their work addresses several subfields such as Surgery, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The scientist's research spans major topics related to diabetes, including Diabetes Management and Research, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Diabetes and associated disorders, and Diabetes Treatment and Management. Other notable topics covered include Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients as well as Gestational Diabetes Research and Management and Diabetes Management and Education.

Frequent publication venues for Roy W. Beck include:

  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Care
  • JAMA
  • New England Journal of Medicine

Their recent papers cover important clinical topics and have been published in high-impact journals. Some of these include:

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin, 2021, JAMA
  • A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, JAMA
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice, 2022, Endocrine Reviews
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, JAMA

Collaboration is a significant element of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Richard M. Bergenstal
  • Peter Calhoun
  • Bruce A. Buckingham
  • R. Paul Wadwa
  • Gregory P. Forlenza

Best Publications

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

    Tamborlane Wv;Beck Rw;Bode Bw

  • Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry

    Kellee M. Miller;Nicole C. Foster;Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes

    Sue A. Brown;Boris P. Kovatchev;Dan Raghinaru;John W. Lum

  • Relationship between optical coherence tomography-measured central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema.

    David J Browning;Adam R Glassman;Lloyd Paul Aiello

  • A computerized method of visual acuity testing: Adaptation of the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study testing protocol

    Roy W Beck;Pamela S Moke;Andrew H Turpin;Frederick L Ferris

  • A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.

    Michael X Repka;Roy W Beck;Jonathan M Holmes;Eileen E Birch

  • Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jeffrey G. Gross;Adam R. Glassman;Lee M. Jampol;Seidu Inusah

  • A phase II randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema.

    Ingrid U Scott;Allison R Edwards;Roy W Beck

  • Evidence of a Strong Association Between Frequency of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c Levels in T1D Exchange Clinic Registry Participants

    Kellee M. Miller;Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal;Robin S. Goland

  • Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema.

    Roy W Beck;Allison R Edwards;Lloyd P Aiello

  • The T1D Exchange clinic registry.

    Roy W. Beck;William V. Tamborlane;Richard M. Bergenstal;Kellee M. Miller

  • The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes.

    Roy W Beck;Irl B Hirsch;Lori Laffel

  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial

    Roy W Beck;Tonya D Riddlesworth;Katrina Ruedy;Andrew Ahmann

  • Acyclovir for the Prevention of Recurrent Herpes Simplex Virus Eye Disease

    Kirk R. Wilhelmus;Roy W. Beck;Pamela S. Moke;Chandler R. Dawson

  • Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP).

    Richard M. Bergenstal;Andrew J. Ahmann;Timothy Bailey;Roy W. Beck

  • Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt versus Deferred Laser Treatment

    Michael J. Elman;Haijing Qin;Lloyd Paul Aiello;Roy W. Beck

  • The Relationships Between Time in Range, Hyperglycemia Metrics, and HbA1c.

    Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal;Peiyao Cheng;Craig Kollman

  • The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

    Jonathan M. Holmes;Roy W. Beck;Michael X. Repka;David A. Leske

  • Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial

    Martin Tauschmann;Hood Thabit;Hood Thabit;Hood Thabit;Lia Bally;Lia Bally;Janet M Allen

  • Three-Year Follow Up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Focal/Grid Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema

    M. S. Ip;R. W. Beck;A. R. Edwards;N. M. Bressler

Frequent Co-Authors

William V. Tamborlane
William V. Tamborlane Yale University
Bruce A. Buckingham
Bruce A. Buckingham Stanford University
Eileen E. Birch
Eileen E. Birch Retina Foundation of the Southwest
David M. Maahs
David M. Maahs Stanford University
Darrell M. Wilson
Darrell M. Wilson Stanford University
Neil M. Bressler
Neil M. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Irl B. Hirsch
Irl B. Hirsch University of Washington
Frederick L. Ferris
Frederick L. Ferris National Institutes of Health
Lloyd Paul Aiello
Lloyd Paul Aiello Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career opportunities in healthcare extends beyond studying traditional medicine. For those seeking flexible routes, a variety of online degrees are available, each with varying admissions requirements and program lengths.

If nursing interests you but you're concerned about competitive admissions, consider looking into what is the easiest nursing school to get into. These programs often have less stringent requirements, making healthcare careers more accessible.

Alternatively, administrative roles such as medical billing and coding can be a great way to enter the healthcare industry. Many medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa offer online programs, helping students manage tuition costs with federal aid.

If standardized entrance exams are a concern, there are nursing schools that don't require teas test, making it easier for aspiring nurses to begin their training without additional testing barriers.

For those drawn to leadership or management, consider enrolling in a healthcare administration online degree. These programs can often be completed quickly, preparing you for in-demand roles in hospitals, clinics, or other medical organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Roy W. Beck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles