World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
31738
World Ranking
11289
National Ranking
5793

Elliot M. Frohman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot M. Frohman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 416 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elliot M. Frohman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot M. Frohman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elliot M. Frohman is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with emphasis on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Ophthalmology. Other subfields of study include Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, such as:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Ocular Diseases and Behçet's Syndrome
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Elliot M. Frohman include:

  • Part II. high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue for severe COVID-19: An immune stabilization strategy for SARS-CoV-2 induced 'PANIC' attack, 2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies, 2021, Neurology
  • The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Criteria and Machine Learning in Multiple Sclerosis and Optic Neuritis Diagnosis, 2022, Neurology
  • Optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, Journal of Neuroinflammation

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Teresa C. Frohman
  • Scott S. Zamvil
  • Laura J. Balcer
  • Roberto Alejandro Cruz
  • Thomas Varkey

Key publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • The Lancet Neurology

Best Publications

  • Multiple Sclerosis — The Plaque and Its Pathogenesis

    Elliot M. Frohman;Michael K. Racke;Cedric S. Raine

  • Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    D. S. Goodin;Elliot Frohman;G. P. Garmany;J. Halper

  • Relation of Visual Function to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis

    Jennifer B. Fisher;Dina A. Jacobs;Clyde E. Markowitz;Steven L. Galetta

  • Quantitative sensory testing: Report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American academy of neurology

    M. E. Shy;E. M. Frohman;Y. T. So;J. C. Arezzo

  • Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Jerry S. Wolinsky;Ponnada A. Narayana;Paul O'Connor;Patricia K. Coyle

  • Immune surveillance in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab

    Olaf Stüve;Olaf Stüve;Christina M Marra;Keith R Jerome;Keith R Jerome;Keith R Jerome;Linda Cook;Linda Cook;Linda Cook

  • RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER IS ASSOCIATED WITH BRAIN ATROPHY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

    E. Gordon-Lipkin;B. Chodkowski;D. S. Reich;S. A. Smith

  • The neuro-ophthalmology of multiple sclerosis

    E.M. Frohman;T.C. Frohman;D.S. Zee;R. McColl

  • Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

    Lauren S. Talman;Esther R. Bisker;David J. Sackel;David A. Long

  • Optical coherence tomography: a window into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis.

    Elliot M Frohman;James G Fujimoto;Teresa C Frohman;Peter A Calabresi

  • Primary retinal pathology in multiple sclerosis as detected by optical coherence tomography

    Shiv Saidha;Stephanie B. Syc;Mohamed A. Ibrahim;Christopher Eckstein

  • Optical coherence tomography segmentation reveals ganglion cell layer pathology after optic neuritis

    Stephanie B. Syc;Shiv Saidha;Scott D. Newsome;John N. Ratchford

  • Assessment: Prevention of post-lumbar puncture headaches: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Randolph W. Evans;Randolph W. Evans;Carmel Armon;Elliot M. Frohman;Douglas S. Goodin

  • The Global Adherence Project (GAP): a multicenter observational study on adherence to disease‐modifying therapies in patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis

    V. Devonshire;Y. Lapierre;R. Macdonell;C. Ramo-Tello

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Reflects Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Four-Year Study

    Shiv Saidha;Omar Al-Louzi;John N. Ratchford;Pavan Bhargava

  • Optical coherence tomography helps differentiate neuromyelitis optica and MS optic neuropathies

    J. N. Ratchford;M. E. Quigg;A. Conger;Teresa Frohman

  • The thalamus and multiple sclerosis: Modern views on pathologic, imaging, and clinical aspects

    Alireza Minagar;Michael H. Barnett;Michael H. Barnett;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Daniel Pelletier

  • MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND THE UROLOGIST

    Scott E. Litwiller;Elliot M. Frohman;Philippe E. Zimmern

  • Optical coherence tomography and disease subtype in multiple sclerosis

    M. Pulicken;E. Gordon-Lipkin;L. J. Balcer;Elliot Frohman

  • Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

    Shiv Saidha;Stephanie B. Syc;Mary K. Durbin;Christopher Eckstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura J. Balcer
Laura J. Balcer New York University
Peter A. Calabresi
Peter A. Calabresi Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael K. Racke
Michael K. Racke Quest Diagnostics (United States)
Olaf Stüve
Olaf Stüve The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Steven Galetta
Steven Galetta New York University Langone Medical Center
Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Scott S. Zamvil
Scott S. Zamvil University of California, San Francisco
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham
Bernhard Hemmer
Bernhard Hemmer Technical University of Munich
David S. Zee
David S. Zee Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals have a diverse range of online degree options that can open doors to specialized career paths. For those interested in healthcare leadership, evaluating mha degree cost is important when choosing a program that balances affordability and quality for future administrators.

Nurses looking to take the next step in their careers may consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which allow for advanced clinical or academic roles without the need for full-time, on-campus attendance.

For those drawn to pharmacology, earning a pharmacy school online can be a flexible option for gaining essential qualifications, while also addressing cost through affordable programs.

Additionally, the rising demand for digital health records makes a him bachelor's degree online attractive for those seeking roles in health information management.

Exploring these online degree options is a strategic way for students to align their education with evolving career opportunities in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Elliot M. Frohman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles