World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
34223
World Ranking
14427
National Ranking
7299

Steven Galetta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Galetta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,014 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven Galetta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Galetta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven Galetta is affiliated with New York University Langone Medical Center in the United States. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a strong focus on Neurology, supported by 252 publications in this subfield. Additional research interests include Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their recent research output includes several papers addressing neurological complications related to COVID-19 and other neurovascular conditions. These include:

  • A Prospective Study of Neurologic Disorders in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in New York City (2020, Neurology)
  • A prospective study of long-term outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without neurological complications (2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences)
  • Hemorrhagic stroke and anticoagulation in COVID-19 (2020, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases)
  • COVID-19 related neuroimaging findings: A signal of thromboembolic complications and a strong prognostic marker of poor patient outcome (2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences)
  • Optic neuritis and autoimmune optic neuropathies: advances in diagnosis and treatment (2022, The Lancet Neurology)

Steven Galetta has co-authored extensively with a number of researchers, highlighting collaborative work in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ariane Lewis
  • Aravind Ganesh
  • James E. Siegler
  • Laura J. Balcer
  • Scott N. Grossman

The venues where Steven Galetta has published regularly demonstrate a focus on neurological sciences and neuro-ophthalmology. Common publication venues are:

  • Neurology
  • Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their research addresses several key topics within neurology and related disorders, including:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Epilepsy research and treatment

Steven Galetta's work spans acute neurological disorder management, long-term neurological outcomes post-infection, neuroimaging markers of disease, and both clinical and research aspects of neuro-ophthalmology and neurovascular conditions. Their research contributions are situated within the context of ongoing global health challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing neurological impact and treatment considerations.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

    Alan J. Thompson;Brenda L. Banwell;Frederik Barkhof;Frederik Barkhof;William M. Carroll

  • Natalizumab plus Interferon Beta-1a for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

    Richard A. Rudick;William H. Stuart;Peter A. Calabresi;Christian Confavreux

  • Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach

    D. H. Miller;B. G. Weinshenker;M. Filippi;B. L. Banwell

  • Relation of Visual Function to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis

    Jennifer B. Fisher;Dina A. Jacobs;Clyde E. Markowitz;Steven L. Galetta

  • Treatment-responsive limbic encephalitis identified by neuropil antibodies: MRI and PET correlates

    Beau M. Ances;Roberta Vitaliani;Robert A. Taylor;Robert A. Taylor;David S. Liebeskind;David S. Liebeskind

  • The neuro-ophthalmology of multiple sclerosis

    E.M. Frohman;T.C. Frohman;D.S. Zee;R. McColl

  • Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

    Lauren S. Talman;Esther R. Bisker;David J. Sackel;David A. Long

  • Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study

    Eva Havrdova;Steven Galetta;Michael Hutchinson;Dusan Stefoski

  • The incidence and significance of anti-natalizumab antibodies: Results from AFFIRM and SENTINEL

    P. A. Calabresi;G. Giovannoni;C. Confavreux;S. L. Galetta

  • The King-Devick test and sports-related concussion: study of a rapid visual screening tool in a collegiate cohort.

    Kristin M. Galetta;Lauren E. Brandes;Karl Maki;E. Mark S. Dziemianowicz

  • Multiple sclerosis: gadolinium enhancement in MR imaging.

    R I Grossman;F Gonzalez-Scarano;S W Atlas;S Galetta

  • MRI findings in Susac’s syndrome

    John O. Susac;F. R. Murtagh;R. A. Egan;J. R. Berger

  • The King-Devick test as a determinant of head trauma and concussion in boxers and MMA fighters

    K. M. Galetta;J. Barrett;Mike Allen;F. Madda

  • Ganglion cell loss in relation to visual disability in multiple sclerosis.

    Scott D. Walter;Hiroshi Ishikawa;Kristin M. Galetta;Reiko E. Sakai

  • Profiles of Obesity, Weight Gain, and Quality of Life in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (Pseudotumor Cerebri)

    Anthony B. Daniels;Grant T. Liu;Nicholas J. Volpe;Steven L. Galetta

  • The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL

    M. Hutchinson;L. Kappos;P. A. Calabresi;C. Confavreux

  • The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the Therapeutics and technology assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    EM Frohman;DS Goodin;PA Calabresi;JR Corboy

  • Macular Volume Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography as a Measure of Neuronal Loss in Multiple Sclerosis

    Bryn M. Burkholder;Bryn M. Burkholder;Benjamin Osborne;Benjamin Osborne;Michael J. Loguidice;Esther Bisker

  • Safety and efficacy of opicinumab in acute optic neuritis (RENEW): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

    Diego Cadavid;Laura Balcer;Steven Galetta;Orhan Aktas

  • The Clinical Spectrum of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

    E. C. Raps;J. D. Rogers;S. L. Galetta;R. A. Solomon

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura J. Balcer
Laura J. Balcer New York University
Peter A. Calabresi
Peter A. Calabresi Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert I. Grossman
Robert I. Grossman New York University
Maureen G. Maguire
Maureen G. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Elliot M. Frohman
Elliot M. Frohman The University of Texas at Austin
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Abass Alavi
Abass Alavi University of Pennsylvania
Scott E. Kasner
Scott E. Kasner University of Pennsylvania
Josep Dalmau
Josep Dalmau University of Barcelona
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA offers more than traditional medical degrees—there are also numerous allied health and nursing pathways that can fast-track your career. Online degrees have become popular options, providing flexibility for working professionals and those looking to shift careers.

For advanced nursing roles, exploring dnp programs online can help you attain a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree at your own pace. Those seeking a less demanding path might consider the easiest dnp program online to minimize workload while still advancing their qualifications.

Not quite ready for a graduate degree? Starting as a practical nurse is an accessible entry point—look into fast track lpn programs, which provide the quickest route to hands-on patient care. For those already holding a nursing bachelor’s degree, direct progression is possible with bsn to np programs online, offering a swift transition into nurse practitioner roles, including specialties like mental health.

Each online pathway presents unique advantages depending on your current education, goals, and desired time to enter the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Galetta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles