World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Ray L. Watts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray L. Watts sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ray L. Watts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray L. Watts sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray L. Watts is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within health and medicine, focusing primarily on Health Professions and Medicine.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

The subfields in which they have contributed research are:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Health Information Management

Their work addresses key topics such as:

  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Quality and Management

Ray L. Watts has coauthored publications with a number of researchers, including:

  • Selwyn M. Vickers
  • Anupam Agarwal
  • Nisha Patel
  • Etty Benveniste
  • Dawn Bulgarella

They have published research in the venue Academic Medicine, contributing at least one publication there.

One of their recent papers is titled Returning to Growth: One Academic Medical Center's Successful Five-Step Approach to Change Management, published in 2021 in Academic Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Effects of coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: evidence of slowing of the functional decline.

    Clifford W. Shults;David Oakes;Karl Kieburtz;M. Flint Beal

  • Core assessment program for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT).

    J. William Langston;Hakan Widner;Christopher G. Goetz;David Brooks

  • An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson's disease (2001): treatment guidelines.

    C. W. Olanow;Ray L. Watts;William C. Koller

  • Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.

    Alan L Whone;Ray L Watts;A Jon Stoessl;Margaret Davis

  • Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

    William J Marks;Raymond T Bartus;Joao Siffert;Charles S Davis

  • Mitochondrial Polymorphisms Significantly Reduce the Risk of Parkinson Disease

    Joelle M. van der Walt;Kristin K. Nicodemus;Eden R. Martin;William K. Scott

  • Mitochondrial DNA variants observed in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease patients

    John M. Shoffner;Michael D. Brown;Antonio Torroni;Marie T. Lott

  • Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation defects in Parkinson's disease

    John M. Shoffner;Ray L. Watts;Jorge L. Juncos;Antonio Torroni

  • Age at onset in two common neurodegenerative diseases is genetically controlled

    Yi Ju Li;William K. Scott;Dale J. Hedges;Fengyu Zhang

  • Movement disorders : neurologic principles and practice

    Ray L. Watts;William C. Koller

  • Comparison of MPTP-induced changes in spontaneous neuronal discharge in the internal pallidal segment and in the substantia nigra pars reticulata in primates.

    Thomas Wichmann;Hagai Bergman;Philip A. Starr;Thyagarajan Subramanian

  • Complete genomic screen in Parkinson disease: evidence for multiple genes.

    William K. Scott;Martha A. Nance;Ray L. Watts;Jean P. Hubble

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial of High-Dosage Coenzyme Q10 in Early Parkinson Disease: No Evidence of Benefit

    M Flint Beal;David Oakes;Ira Shoulson

  • Ophthalmologic features of Parkinson's disease.

    V. Biousse;B. C. Skibell;R. L. Watts;D. N. Loupe

  • Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson's disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa.

    Robert A. Hauser;Olivier Rascol;Amos D. Korczyn;A. Jon Stoessl

  • Gene delivery of neurturin to putamen and substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

    C. Warren Olanow;Raymond T. Bartus;Tiffany L. Baumann;Stewart Factor

  • A randomized clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 and GPI-1485 in early Parkinson disease

    Karl Kieburtz;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina;Wendy R. Galpern;Barbara Tilley

  • Corticobasal degeneration Neuropathologic and clinical heterogeneity

    J. A. Schneider;R. L. Watts;M. Gearing;R. P. Brewer

  • Glutathione S-transferase omega-1 modifies age-at-onset of Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease

    Yi Ju Li;Sofia A. Oliveira;Puting Xu;Eden R. Martin

  • Randomized, blind, controlled trial of transdermal rotigotine in early Parkinson disease.

    R. L. Watts;J. Jankovic;C. Waters;A. Rajput

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine
Rajesh Pahwa
Rajesh Pahwa University of Kansas
Christopher G. Goetz
Christopher G. Goetz Rush University Medical Center
William C. Koller
William C. Koller University of Miami
Roy A.E. Bakay
Roy A.E. Bakay Rush University Medical Center
Matthew B. Stern
Matthew B. Stern University of Pennsylvania
William G. Ondo
William G. Ondo Cornell University
Christine Klein
Christine Klein University of Lübeck
William K. Scott
William K. Scott University of Miami
Richard H. Myers
Richard H. Myers Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Medicine-related career in the USA doesn’t always require a traditional path. Many students explore healthcare through alternative and online degrees tailored to diverse backgrounds and goals. For example, those interested in patient care can access affordable nursing programs online. These programs make healthcare education more accessible for students needing flexibility or cost savings.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement often consider the cheapest rn to bsn program options online, earning a higher qualification without interrupting their work schedule. Meanwhile, non-nursing majors looking to enter advanced nursing roles can apply for online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors, which provide a direct pathway into the field.

For those aiming to lead or teach in the healthcare sector, pursuing an online phd programs nursing is an efficient way to gain specialized expertise. With these online options, students have greater flexibility and access to accredited education, opening doors to various rewarding career pathways in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ray L. Watts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles