World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
37734
World Ranking
5830
National Ranking
3129

William C. Koller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. Koller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 381 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William C. Koller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. Koller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William C. Koller was affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research contributions were primarily in the field of Medicine, with a concentration on Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work focused on topics related to neurological disorders and treatments, Parkinson's Disease mechanisms and treatments, and dementia and cognitive impairment research.

Among their recent publications were:

  • "Predictors of multi-domain cognitive decline following DBS for treatment of Parkinson's disease," published in 2021 in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • "Dose-effect relationships between manganese exposure and neurological, neuropsychological and pulmonary function in confined space bridge welders," published in 2020 in UNC Libraries

William C. Koller collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • William J. Marks
  • Frances M. Weaver
  • Matthew Stern
  • Kenneth A. Follett
  • Domenic J. Reda

The scientist's publications appeared in venues such as Parkinsonism & Related Disorders and UNC Libraries.

Best Publications

  • Effects of tocopherol and deprenyl on the progression of disability in early Parkinson's disease

    W. Koller;C. W. Olanow;R. Rodnitzky;J. S. Fink

  • Variable expression of Parkinson's disease A base‐line analysis of the DAT ATOP cohort

    Joseph Jankovic;Michael P McDermott;Jonathan T Carter;Susan A Gauthier

  • International multicenter pilot study of the first comprehensive self-completed nonmotor symptoms questionnaire for Parkinson's disease : The NMSQuest study

    Kallol Ray Chaudhuri;Pablo Martinez-Martin;Anthony H.V. Schapira;Fabrizio Stocchi

  • An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson's disease (2001): treatment guidelines.

    C. W. Olanow;Ray L. Watts;William C. Koller

  • Randomized, double-blind trial of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in PD

    J.G. Nutt;K.J. Burchiel;C.L. Comella;J. Jankovic

  • Mitochondrial Polymorphisms Significantly Reduce the Risk of Parkinson Disease

    Joelle M. van der Walt;Kristin K. Nicodemus;Eden R. Martin;William K. Scott

  • Factors that impact on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: results from an international survey

    L. Findley;T. Eichhorn;Aleksandar Janca;J. Kazenwadel

  • High‐frequency unilateral thalamic stimulation in the treatment of essential and parkinsonian tremor

    Koller W;Pahwa R;Busenbark K;Hubble J

  • Falls and Parkinson's Disease

    Koller Wc;Glatt S;Vetere-Overfield B;Hassanein R

  • The effect of deprenyl and levodopa on the progression of Parkinson's disease

    C W Olanow;R A Hauser;L Gauger;T Malapira

  • Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor.

    William C. Koller;Kelly E. Lyons;Steven B. Wilkinson;Alexander I. Troster

  • Age at onset in two common neurodegenerative diseases is genetically controlled

    Yi Ju Li;William K. Scott;Dale J. Hedges;Fengyu Zhang

  • The relationship of essential tremor to other movement disorders: Report on 678 patients

    William C. Koller;Karen Busenbark;Kevin Miner

  • Treatment interventions for Parkinson's disease: an evidence based assessment

    Olivier Rascol;Christopher Goetz;William Koller;Werner Poewe

  • Risk factors for Parkinson's disease

    Hubble Jp;Cao T;Hassanein Re;Neuberger Js

  • Environmental Risk Factors in Parkinson’s Disease

    W. Koller;B. Vetere-Overfield;C. Gray;C. Alexander

  • Movement disorders : neurologic principles and practice

    Ray L. Watts;William C. Koller

  • Complete genomic screen in Parkinson disease: evidence for multiple genes.

    William K. Scott;Martha A. Nance;Ray L. Watts;Jean P. Hubble

  • Multicenter Study of Autologous Adrenal Medullary Transplantation to the Corpus Striatum in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease

    Christopher G. Goetz;C. Warren Olanow;William C. Koller;Richard D. Penn

  • Sensory symptoms in Parkinson's disease

    William C. Koller

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajesh Pahwa
Rajesh Pahwa University of Kansas
Alexander I. Tröster
Alexander I. Tröster Barrow Neurological Institute
Kelly E. Lyons
Kelly E. Lyons University of Kansas
Andres M. Lozano
Andres M. Lozano University of Toronto
Mitchell F. Brin
Mitchell F. Brin Allergan (Ireland)
Christopher G. Goetz
Christopher G. Goetz Rush University Medical Center
Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine
John G. Nutt
John G. Nutt Oregon Health & Science University
Andrew J. Lees
Andrew J. Lees University College London
Ray L. Watts
Ray L. Watts University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in a career in medicine but want to explore flexible study options, there are several cheapest online nursing program choices available. These programs offer affordable pathways to a nursing career, allowing students to study remotely without sacrificing quality.

For those who are already registered nurses, pursuing an advanced degree can open doors to leadership roles. Many professionals opt for phd in nursing online programs to gain expertise in research, teaching, or advanced clinical practice.

Current RNs looking to boost their qualifications and earning potential may consider rn to bsn online programs. These bridge programs are designed for working nurses, helping them earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing faster and more affordably.

Non-nurses interested in advanced nursing roles can benefit from direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online. These programs provide a direct pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner, even if your background isn’t in nursing.

Exploring these online options can help you tailor your education to fit your goals, budget, and schedule while launching a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing William C. Koller

Recently Published Articles