World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudio Cobelli

Claudio Cobelli

Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 125 3067 2860 80 71 963 64815

Claudio Cobelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudio Cobelli between 1972 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudio Cobelli published across 55 years, from 1972 to 2026, averaging 19 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2014. 13 of the 1,047 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2014. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 12 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 28 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 57 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1972 2026

1,047 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudio Cobelli: publications per year, 1972 to 2026
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 5
1976 2
1977 4
1978 6
1979 8
1980 8
1981 8
1982 9
1983 8
1984 13
1985 12
1986 10
1987 11
1988 15
1989 5
1990 13
1991 13
1992 8
1993 14
1994 18
1995 7
1996 19
1997 28
1998 16
1999 15
2000 19
2001 23
2002 32
2003 11
2004 10
2005 14
2006 34
2007 28
2008 47
2009 42
2010 40
2011 35
2012 40
2013 45
2014 57
2015 49
2016 42
2017 34
2018 31
2019 33
2020 27
2021 21
2022 22
2023 15
2024 7
2025 12
2026 1
Total 1,047
Download as CSV

Claudio Cobelli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Cobelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 961–980 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 963 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91 963
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudio Cobelli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Cobelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 125 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 125
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Claudio Cobelli is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism within the broader fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Surgery
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology

Main research topics covered by Claudio Cobelli include:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease

The scientist has contributed to a significant number of publications in a variety of venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Diabetes
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Among recent scholarly articles associated with Claudio Cobelli are:

  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice (2022, Endocrine Reviews)
  • Genome-Wide Association Study of Peripheral Artery Disease (2021, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine)
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control: The Pivotal International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial (2021, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics)
  • Estimation of Hemoglobin A1c from Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: Is Time In Range All We Need? (2020, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics)
  • Aetiology of Type 2 diabetes in people with a 'normal' body mass index: testing the personal fat threshold hypothesis (2023, Clinical Science)

Claudio Cobelli has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, frequently publishing alongside:

  • Chiara Dalla Man
  • Marcello C. Laurenti
  • Adrian Vella
  • Aoife M. Egan
  • Rita Basu

Best Publications

  • Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range

    Tadej Battelino;Thomas Danne;Richard M. Bergenstal;Stephanie A. Amiel

  • Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity.

    R N Bergman;Y Z Ider;C R Bowden;C Cobelli

  • Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose.

    R. N. Bergman;L. S. Phillips;Claudio Cobelli

  • International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    Thomas Danne;Revital Nimri;Tadej Battelino;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • Meal Simulation Model of the Glucose-Insulin System

    C.D. Man;R.A. Rizza;C. Cobelli

  • In Silico Preclinical Trials: A Proof of Concept in Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes

    Boris P. Kovatchev;Marc Breton;Chiara Dalla Man;Claudio Cobelli

  • DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men

    K. Sreekumaran Nair;Robert A. Rizza;Peter O'brien;Ketan Dhatariya

  • The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator New Features

    Chiara Dalla Man;Francesco Micheletto;Dayu Lv;Marc Breton

  • Artificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future

    Claudio Cobelli;Eric Renard;Boris Kovatchev

  • The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems : model formulation, identification, and validation

    Ewart R. Carson;Claudio Cobelli;Ludwik Finkelstein

  • Saturable transport of insulin from plasma into the central nervous system of dogs in vivo. A mechanism for regulated insulin delivery to the brain.

    G D Baura;D M Foster;D Porte;S E Kahn

  • Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control

    C. Cobelli;C. Dalla Man;G. Sparacino;L. Magni

  • Mechanisms of the Age-Associated Deterioration in Glucose Tolerance: Contribution of Alterations in Insulin Secretion, Action, and Clearance

    Rita Basu;Elena Breda;Ann L. Oberg;Claudia C. Powell

  • SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies.

    P.Hugh R. Barrett;P.Hugh R. Barrett;P.Hugh R. Barrett;Bradley M. Bell;Bradley M. Bell;Bradley M. Bell;Claudio Cobelli;Claudio Cobelli;Claudio Cobelli;Hellmut Golde;Hellmut Golde;Hellmut Golde

  • Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis.

    C. Cobelli;J. J. DiStefano

  • Adaptive changes in pancreatic beta cell fractional area and beta cell turnover in human pregnancy

    A. E. Butler;L. Cao-Minh;R. Galasso;R. A. Rizza

  • Increased prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian-Indian men

    Kitt Falk Petersen;Sylvie Dufour;Jing Feng;Douglas Befroy

  • A Markerless Motion Capture System to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics: Visual Hull and Simulated Annealing Approach

    S Corazza;L Mundermann;Am Chaudhari;T Demattio

  • Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Minimal Model Indexes of β-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity

    Elena Breda;Melissa K. Cavaghan;Gianna Toffolo;Kenneth S. Polonsky

  • Diabetes: Models, Signals and control

    C Cobelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni Sparacino
Giovanni Sparacino University of Padua
Angelo Avogaro
Angelo Avogaro University of Padua
Andrea Facchinetti
Andrea Facchinetti University of Padua
Robert A. Rizza
Robert A. Rizza Mayo Clinic
Lalo Magni
Lalo Magni University of Pavia
Francis J. Doyle
Francis J. Doyle Brown University
Giuseppe De Nicolao
Giuseppe De Nicolao University of Pavia
Gianluigi Pillonetto
Gianluigi Pillonetto University of Padua
Riccardo Bellazzi
Riccardo Bellazzi University of Pavia
Rickey E. Carter
Rickey E. Carter Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare careers can open doors to rewarding opportunities beyond a traditional MD path. For students interested in nursing, choosing from nursing programs with high acceptance rates can make entry into the field more accessible, especially for those with varied academic backgrounds or non-traditional timelines.

Some schools have also made starting a nursing education even easier by being among the nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi. This approach can streamline the admissions process and help students focus on their core studies.

If you’re interested in supporting the healthcare system without direct patient care, consider enrolling at one of the top medical billing and coding online schools. These programs prepare students for in-demand roles in healthcare administration and records management.

For future leaders and managers in healthcare, earning a degree from the best online healthcare administration degree programs can fast-track your journey to executive roles and open career advancement opportunities in hospitals, clinics, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Cobelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles