World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Katsuei Shibuki

Katsuei Shibuki

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6863
World Ranking
8734
National Ranking
319

Katsuei Shibuki publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katsuei Shibuki sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 177 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Katsuei Shibuki D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katsuei Shibuki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katsuei Shibuki is affiliated with Niigata University in Japan and has contributed primarily to the field of Neuroscience, focusing on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology. Their research covers a diverse range of topics that include visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, retinal development and disorders, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, multisensory perception and integration, neural and behavioral psychology studies, as well as vestibular and auditory disorders.

Shibuki's recent publications reflect an active engagement with both clinical and experimental neuroscience. Notable papers include:

  • Rapid Recovery From Cortical Blindness Caused by an Old Cerebral Infarction, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Auditory cortical activity elicited by infrared laser irradiation from the outer ear in Mongolian gerbils, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Visual Field Test With Gaze Check Tasks: Application in a Homonymous Hemianopic Patient Unaware of the Visual Defects, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Visualization of cortical activation in human brain by flavoprotein fluorescence imaging, 2022, Journal of neurosurgery

Frequent coauthors in Shibuki's research include Shin Hasegawa, Ryuichi Hishida, Ichiro Wakui, Takeo Fujimura, and Masaru Tomikawa.

Their work has been published in journals such as Frontiers in Neurology, PLoS ONE, and the Journal of Neurosurgery, demonstrating a focus on venues that cover clinical neurology and experimental neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Impairment of motor coordination, Purkinje cell synapse formation, and cerebellar long-term depression in GluRδ2 mutant mice

    Nobuko Kashiwabuchi;Kazutaka Ikeda;Kazuaki Araki;Tomoo Hirano

  • Endogenous nitric oxide release required for long-term synaptic depression in the cerebellum

    Unknown

  • An electrochemical microprobe for detecting nitric oxide release in brain tissue

    Katsuei Shibuki

  • Deficient Cerebellar Long-Term Depression, Impaired Eyeblink Conditioning, and Normal Motor Coordination in GFAP Mutant Mice

    Katsuei Shibuki;Hiroshi Gomi;Lu Chen;Shaowen Bao

  • Dynamic imaging of somatosensory cortical activity in the rat visualized by flavoprotein autofluorescence

    Katsuei Shibuki;Ryuichi Hishida;Hiroatsu Murakami;Masaharu Kudoh

  • Cerebellar long-term potentiation under suppressed postsynaptic Ca2+ activity.

    Katsuei Shibuki;Diasuke Okada

  • The extrageniculate visual pathway generates distinct response properties in the higher visual areas of mice

    Manavu Tohmi;Reiko Meguro;Hiroaki Tsukano;Ryuichi Hishida

  • Destruction of inferior olive induces rapid depression in synaptic action of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

    Masao Ito;Naoko Nisimaru;Katsuei Shibuki

  • Endogenous opioid actions and effects of environmental disturbance on parturition and oxytocin secretion in rats.

    G. Leng;S. Mansfield;R. J. Bicknell;R. E. Blackburn

  • Enduring critical period plasticity visualized by transcranial flavoprotein imaging in mouse primary visual cortex.

    Manavu Tohmi;Hiroki Kitaura;Seiji Komagata;Masaharu Kudoh

  • Dynamic properties of nitric oxide release from parallel fibres in rat cerebellar slices.

    K Shibuki;S Kimura

  • Roles of nitric oxide as a vasodilator in neurovascular coupling of mouse somatosensory cortex.

    Hiroki Kitaura;Naonori Uozumi;Manavu Tohmi;Maya Yamazaki

  • Transcranial fluorescence imaging of auditory cortical plasticity regulated by acoustic environments in mice

    Kuniyuki Takahashi;Ryuichi Hishida;Yamato Kubota;Masaharu Kudoh

  • cAMP-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation of Nitric Oxide Release from Cerebellar Parallel Fibers in Rats

    Shinji Kimura;Seiji Uchiyama;Hideaki E. Takahashi;Katsuei Shibuki

  • Chondroitin Sulfate Is Required for Onset and Offset of Critical Period Plasticity in Visual Cortex.

    Xubin Hou;Nozomu Yoshioka;Hiroaki Tsukano;Akiko Sakai

  • Importance of Polysynaptic Inputs and Horizontal Connectivity in the Generation of Tetanus-Induced Long-Term Potentiation in the Rat Auditory Cortex

    Masaharu Kudoh;Katsuei Shibuki

  • Extracellular potassium changes in the rat neurohypophysis during activation of the magnocellular neurosecretory system.

    G Leng;K Shibuki

  • NO enhances presynaptic currents during cerebellar mossy fiber-granule cell LTP.

    Arianna Maffei;Francesca Prestori;Katsuei Shibuki;Paola Rossi

  • Layer‐specific NO dependence of long‐term potentiation and biased NO release in layer V in the rat auditory cortex

    Hidemitsu Wakatsuki;Hiroshi Gomi;Masaharu Kudoh;Shinji Kimura

  • Delineation of a frequency-organized region isolated from the mouse primary auditory cortex

    X Hiroaki Tsukano;Masao Horie;Takeshi Bo;Arikuni Uchimura

  • Long-term potentiation in the auditory cortex of adult rats

    Masaharu Kudoh;Katsuei Shibuki

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeshi Yagi
Takeshi Yagi Osaka University
Akiyoshi Kakita
Akiyoshi Kakita Niigata University
Yuchio Yanagawa
Yuchio Yanagawa Gunma University
Kenji Sakimura
Kenji Sakimura Niigata University
Shigeyoshi Itohara
Shigeyoshi Itohara RIKEN Center for Brain Science
Hitoshi Takahashi
Hitoshi Takahashi Niigata University
Yukihiko Fujii
Yukihiko Fujii Niigata University
Masayoshi Mishina
Masayoshi Mishina Ritsumeikan University
Nobuyuki Takei
Nobuyuki Takei Niigata University
Manabu Abe
Manabu Abe Niigata University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads to intersections with various online degrees and professional paths. Many students consider fields like social work and applied behavior analysis for greater career flexibility or to supplement their neuroscience expertise. If you're interested in mental health or behavioral sciences, pursuing one of the cheapest msw programs online can provide a cost-effective route to licensure and clinical practice.

For those focusing on behavior therapy or working with neurodiverse populations, earning a credential through online bcba masters programs can offer a specialized path forward. Students seeking to fast-track their education should consider accelerated msw options or a fast track psychology degree online—both can lead to rewarding careers and advanced study in neuroscience-related fields.

Flexibility, affordability, and speed of completion are major considerations when choosing an online program. Exploring these degrees can open doors to research, clinical, or counseling roles that make a tangible impact in neuroscience and allied professions.

Best Scientists Citing Katsuei Shibuki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles