World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
24
Citations
6154
World Ranking
1645
National Ranking
52

Meindert Fennema publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meindert Fennema sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 126 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Meindert Fennema D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meindert Fennema sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 24 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meindert Fennema is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed to social and economic history research. Their publication record includes work in both historical and psychological domains, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Meindert Fennema include:

  • "Hittjo Kruyswijk, Gek, niet ziek? Lucas Lindeboom, Abraham Kuyper en de stichting van gereformeerde ziekenhuizen in Nederland (1880-1940)," 2021, published in TSEG/ Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History
  • "High in numeracy, high in reflection, but still irrationally biased: How gist explains risky choices," 2025, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Meindert Fennema has worked with a range of coauthors, including:

  • Valerie F. Reyna
  • Jordan E. Roue
  • Sarah M. Edelson
  • Aadya Singh

Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • TSEG/ Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History

The topics and subfields related to Meindert Fennema's work are not explicitly categorized, but their research spans historical analysis with a focus on institutional foundations in the Netherlands as well as cognitive psychology dealing with decision making and risk assessment.

Meindert Fennema's scholarly contributions provide insight into both historical developments in Dutch healthcare institutions and cognitive processes influencing human judgment. The interdisciplinary nature of their work bridges social history and psychological experimentation, contributing to multiple academic communities.

Best Publications

  • Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote?

    Wouter Van Der Brug;Meindert Fennema;Jean Tillie

  • Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam: Civic communities and ethnic networks

    Meindert Fennema;Jean Tillie

  • Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed A two-step model of aggregate electoral support *

    Wouter Van Der Brug;Meindert Fennema;Jean Tillie

  • Civic Community, Political Participation and Political Trust of Ethnic Groups

    Meindert Fennema;Jean Tillie

  • The making of a transnational capitalist class: corporate power in the twenty-first century

    William K. Carroll;Colin Carson;Meindert Fennema;Eelke Heemskerk

  • Some Conceptual Issues and Problems in the Comparison of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe:

    Meindert Fennema

  • Is there a transnational business community

    William K. Carroll;Meindert Fennema

  • International Networks of Banks and Industry

    M. Fennema

  • Analysing interlocking directorates: Theory and methods

    Meindert Fennema;Huibert Schijf

  • The concept and measurement of ethnic community

    Meindert Fennema

  • Populist Parties of the Right

    M. Fennema

  • What causes people to vote for a radical right party? A review of recent work

    W. van der Brug;M. Fennema

  • The immigration and integration debate in the Netherlands: discursive and programmatic reactions to the rise of anti-immigration parties

    S. van Heerden;S.L. de Lange;W. van der Brug;M. Fennema

  • Constituting Corporate Europe: A Study of Elite Social Organization

    William K. Carroll;Meindert Fennema;Eelke M. Heemskerk

  • The global corporate elite after the financial crisis: evidence from the transnational network of interlocking directorates

    Eelke M. Heemskerk;Meindert Fennema;William K. Carroll

  • Problems in the study of the transnational business community. A Reply to Kentor and Jang.

    William K. Carroll;Meindert Fennema

  • Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite

    Eelke Heemskerk;Meindert Fennema

  • Legal repression of extreme-right parties and racial discrimination

    Meindert Fennema

  • Do immigrant policies matter? Ethnic civic communities and immigrant policies in Amsterdam, Liège and Zurich

    M. Fennema;J.N. Tillie

  • Geert Wilders, tovenaarsleerling

    M. Fennema

  • Women on Board: Female Board Membership as a Form of Elite Democratization

    Eelke Michiel Heemskerk;Meindert Fennema

  • The Support Base of Radical Right Parties in the Enlarged European Union

    Wouter Van der Brug;Meindert Fennema

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science can open the door to a wide range of online programs and career options. Many students interested in government, public policy, or law also consider a bachelor degree in history to gain a strong foundation in understanding political contexts and historical developments.

For those seeking flexibility and versatility, an interdisciplinary studies online degree allows students to combine courses from multiple fields, such as political science, sociology, and economics, tailoring the program to fit specific career aspirations.

Advancing your studies with online graduate history programs can deepen your research skills and broaden your expertise in historical and political analysis, which is highly valued in academia, government, and consulting roles.

Additionally, students or professionals looking for quicker pathways to boost employability should explore certification programs. These can provide specialized skills in areas like project management, data analysis, and public relations, leading to well-paying roles in diverse political and administrative careers.

Best Scientists Citing Meindert Fennema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles