World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew J. Goodwin

Matthew J. Goodwin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 32 970 877 156 145 118 7940

Matthew J. Goodwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Goodwin between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Goodwin published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2017. 7 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2017. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Goodwin: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 2
2009 9
2010 6
2011 8
2012 11
2013 7
2014 7
2015 8
2016 12
2017 28
2018 11
2019 5
2020 4
2021 3
2022 3
2023 21
2024 3
2025 4
Total 162
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Goodwin publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 116–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 118 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67 118
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Goodwin D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Goodwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86 32
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew J. Goodwin is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Engineering, Chemistry, and Medicine, with the most contributions in Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability, and the Environment.

The scientist's work frequently appears in several publication venues, including arXiv (Cornell University), Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Reviews, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. Among their frequent co-authors are Frédérique Vanholsbeeck, Gerald J. Meyer, Alexander M. Deetz, Joshua Workman, and Ashvin Thambyah.

Matthew J. Goodwin's research focuses on several key topics:

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
  • Radical Photochemical Reactions
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Veterinary Equine Medical Research

Recent publications demonstrate a breadth of investigation and collaboration. Notable papers include:

  • Factors that Impact Photochemical Cage Escape Yields, 2024, Chemical Reviews
  • Maximizing Amplified Energy Transfer: Tuning Particle Size and Dye Loading in Conjugated Polymer Nanoparticles, 2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Detection of subtle cartilage and bone tissue degeneration in the equine joint using polarisation-sensitive optical coherence tomography, 2022, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Nanosecond Intra-Ionic Chloride Photo-Oxidation, 2023, Inorganic Chemistry
  • Optical coherence tomography imaging of evoked neural activity in sciatic nerve of rat, 2021, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics

This body of work reflects a focus on advanced imaging techniques, photochemical processes, and biomedical applications. The blend of materials chemistry and biomedical engineering within their research aligns with efforts to better understand biological systems and develop new technological approaches in medicine and chemistry.

Best Publications

  • National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy

    Roger Eatwell;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain

    Robert Anthony Ford;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result

    Matthew J. Goodwin;Oliver Heath

  • Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit:

    Matthew J. Goodwin;Caitlin Milazzo

  • Revolt on the Right

    Unknown

  • Brexit

    Unknown

  • Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party

    Robert Ford;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament elections

    Robert Ford;Matthew J. Goodwin;David Cutts

  • New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party

    Matthew J. Goodwin

  • Britain After Brexit: A Nation Divided

    Matthew J. Goodwin;Robert Ford

  • Why Britain voted For brexit: An individual-level analysis of the 2016 referendum vote

    Harold D Clarke;Matthew Goodwin;Paul F Whiteley

  • Anti-immigrant, politically disaffected or still racist after all? Examining the attitudinal drivers of extreme right support in Britain in the 2009 European elections

    David Cutts;Robert Ford;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • Understanding UKIP: Identity, social change and the left behind

    Robert Ford;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics

    Matthew J. Goodwin;Caitlin Milazzo

  • Brexit Vote Explained: Poverty, Low Skills and Lack of Opportunities

    Matthew J. Goodwin;Oliver Heath

  • Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union

    Harold D Clarke;Matthew Goodwin;Paul F Whiteley

  • Immigration, Issue Ownership and the Rise of UKIP

    James Dennison;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • The 2017 General Election, Brexit and the Return to Two‐Party Politics: An Aggregate‐Level Analysis of the Result

    Oliver Heath;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain

    Roger Eatwell;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • The diversity Wave:A meta-analysis of the native-born white response to ethnic diversity.

    Eric Kaufmann;Matthew J. Goodwin

  • THE RISE AND FAULTS OF THE INTERNALIST PERSPECTIVE IN EXTREME RIGHT STUDIES

    Matthew J. Goodwin

  • Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics

    David Cutts;Matthew J. Goodwin;Oliver Heath;Paula Surridge

  • Right Response: Understanding and Countering Populist Extremism in Europe

    Matthew J. Goodwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Ford
Robert Ford University of Manchester
Paul Whiteley
Paul Whiteley University of Essex
Harold D. Clarke
Harold D. Clarke The University of Texas at Dallas
David Cutts
David Cutts Brown University
Mark Pickup
Mark Pickup Simon Fraser University
Eric P. Kaufmann
Eric P. Kaufmann Birkbeck, University of London
Peter John
Peter John King's College London
Simon Hix
Simon Hix European University Institute
Francesca Gains
Francesca Gains University of Manchester
Andrew Geddes
Andrew Geddes European University Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science can open doors to a wide variety of related fields and flexible degree options. Many students benefit from attending some of the cheapest online college programs, which offer affordable routes to obtaining a degree in Political Science or even supplementary disciplines.

If you are passionate about policy and global issues, you might consider how your skills could transfer to environmental advocacy, policymaking, or research, all of which are highlighted under what are some possible future career fields in environmental science?. Interdisciplinary fields like these are growing and offer exciting and meaningful career pathways.

Strengthening your research and analytical skills is also possible by exploring the best online math degrees. These skills are highly valued in areas such as data analysis, polling, and public administration.

Finally, for those interested in information management, earning an online degree in library science can complement your political science background and open opportunities in government archives, research institutions, or academic libraries.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Goodwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles