What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Harold D. Clarke spends much of his time researching Politics, Political economy, Voting, Public economics and Positive economics.
The various areas that Harold D. Clarke examines in his Politics study include Social psychology and Economic history.
His Political economy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Democracy, Electoral system, Public administration, Development economics and Dealignment.
His Public administration research integrates issues from First-past-the-post voting, Single non-transferable vote, Group voting ticket, Proportional representation and Competence.
His research in the fields of Instant-runoff voting overlaps with other disciplines such as Panel survey.
His Positive economics research includes themes of Social science and Conventional wisdom.
His most cited work include:
- Political Choice in Britain (552 citations)
- Performance Politics and the British Voter (241 citations)
- Does Mode Matter For Modeling Political Choice? Evidence From the 2005 British Election Study (202 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Politics, Political economy, Public administration, Voting and Law.
Political efficacy is closely connected to Social psychology in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Politics.
As part of the same scientific family, Harold D. Clarke usually focuses on Political economy, concentrating on Austerity and intersecting with Coalition government and Unemployment.
His Public administration study incorporates themes from American political science, Government, Political sociology, Democracy and Public opinion.
His Voting research incorporates themes from General election and Referendum.
He combines subjects such as Proportional representation and Primary election with his study of Split-ticket voting.
He most often published in these fields:
- Politics (55.40%)
- Political economy (47.39%)
- Public administration (30.31%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?
- Political economy (47.39%)
- Politics (55.40%)
- Voting (21.25%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Political economy, Politics, Voting, Public administration and General election.
His Political economy research integrates issues from Austerity, Referendum, Presidential election and Populism.
His Politics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Valence, Immigration and China.
His work on Disapproval voting and Group voting ticket as part of general Voting research is often related to Heuristics and Survey data collection, thus linking different fields of science.
His research investigates the connection with Public administration and areas like Public opinion which intersect with concerns in International community.
His work carried out in the field of General election brings together such families of science as Outcome, Voter registration and Economy.
Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote (85 citations)
- Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union (84 citations)
- Modelling the dynamics of support for a right-wing populist party: the case of UKIP (35 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Political economy, Voting, General election, Law and Politics.
He merges Political economy with Brexit in his study.
In the field of Voting, his study on Ballot overlaps with subjects such as Survey data collection and Heuristics.
The concepts of his General election study are interwoven with issues in Outcome and Economy.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Valence and Politics.
His research integrates issues of Panel data, Publics, Public engagement, Poverty and International development in his study of Public administration.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
