H-Index & Metrics Best Publications

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Law and Political Science D-index 21 Citations 6,558 46 World Ranking 1323 National Ranking 239

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Politics
  • World War II

Politics, Public opinion, Misinformation, Public administration and Political economy are his primary areas of study. His studies in Politics integrate themes in fields like Scholarship, State and Intervention. His Public opinion study incorporates themes from Iraq war, Presidential election and International relations.

He combines subjects such as Social psychology, Fake news, Presidential campaign and Motivated reasoning with his study of Misinformation. Jason Reifler has researched Motivated reasoning in several fields, including Persistence, Ignorance, Fact checking and Ideology. His Public administration research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Sophistication, Institution, Foreign policy and Public relations.

His most cited work include:

  • When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions (1069 citations)
  • Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial (610 citations)
  • Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information (260 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Politics, Political economy, Public opinion, Foreign policy and Social psychology are his primary areas of study. His work deals with themes such as Valence, Fact checking and Public relations, which intersect with Politics. Jason Reifler has included themes like Elite and Normative in his Public opinion study.

His Foreign policy research incorporates themes from International relations, Political psychology and Public administration. The various areas that Jason Reifler examines in his Social psychology study include Test, Misinformation, Positive economics and Motivated reasoning. His Motivated reasoning study incorporates themes from Persistence and Ignorance.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Politics (39.13%)
  • Political economy (31.88%)
  • Public opinion (30.43%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Politics (39.13%)
  • Public opinion (30.43%)
  • Fake news (7.25%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Politics, Public opinion, Fake news, Misinformation and Political economy. While working on this project, Jason Reifler studies both Politics and CHAOS. The concepts of his Public opinion study are interwoven with issues in Test, Disinformation and Foreign policy.

His work carried out in the field of Misinformation brings together such families of science as Digital media, Social psychology, Rural area, Fact checking and Social media. His studies deal with areas such as General election, Ideology, Convention and Media bias as well as Fact checking. His Political economy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Liberalism, Feeling and Democracy, Capitalist peace.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability (50 citations)
  • Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. (50 citations)
  • A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. (25 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • World War II
  • Politics

Jason Reifler spends much of his time researching Misinformation, Internet privacy, Fake news, Social media and Fact checking. His Misinformation study combines topics in areas such as Digital literacy, Media literacy, Mainstream and Literacy. His research integrates issues of Disinformation and False accusation in his study of Internet privacy.

His Fact checking research incorporates elements of Test, General election, Social psychology, Convention and Public opinion. Jason Reifler undertakes interdisciplinary study in the fields of Speculation and Politics through his works. His study in Politics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Criminology, Social status and Set.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform.

Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler;Peter A. Ubel.
Medical Care (2013)

268 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Jason Reifler

Stephan Lewandowsky

Stephan Lewandowsky

University of Bristol

Publications: 32

Ullrich K. H. Ecker

Ullrich K. H. Ecker

University of Western Australia

Publications: 30

Sander van der Linden

Sander van der Linden

University of Cambridge

Publications: 17

Gordon Pennycook

Gordon Pennycook

University of Regina

Publications: 16

David G. Rand

David G. Rand

MIT

Publications: 16

Saad B. Omer

Saad B. Omer

Yale University

Publications: 15

David Lazer

David Lazer

Northeastern University

Publications: 12

Filippo Menczer

Filippo Menczer

Indiana University

Publications: 11

Alessandro Flammini

Alessandro Flammini

Indiana University

Publications: 11

Sarah E. Kreps

Sarah E. Kreps

Cornell University

Publications: 11

Julie Leask

Julie Leask

University of Sydney

Publications: 10

Huan Liu

Huan Liu

Arizona State University

Publications: 10

Adam J. Berinsky

Adam J. Berinsky

MIT

Publications: 9

Cornelia Betsch

Cornelia Betsch

University of Erfurt

Publications: 9

Antonio Scala

Antonio Scala

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Publications: 9

Norman Schofield

Norman Schofield

Washington University in St. Louis

Publications: 8

Something went wrong. Please try again later.