World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
54
Citations
26574
World Ranking
168
National Ranking
104

Brendan Nyhan publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brendan Nyhan sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 156 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Brendan Nyhan D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brendan Nyhan sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow
  • 2015 - Frank Prize, University of Florida

Overview

Brendan Nyhan is a researcher affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their work primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science, communication, artificial intelligence, political science and international relations, and health.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including misinformation and its impacts, media influence and politics, social media and politics, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, electoral systems and political participation, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Political sectarianism in America, 2020, Science
  • A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook, 2023, Science

Frequent co-authors working with Nyhan include:

  • Jason Reifler
  • Andrew M. Guess
  • Benjamin Lyons
  • Jacob Montgomery
  • Michael Lerner

The scientist's work has been published most often in Harvard Dataverse, Journal of Experimental Political Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science, and Nature Human Behaviour.

Brendan Nyhan has received the Andrew Carnegie Fellow award in 2018 and the Frank Prize from the University of Florida in 2015.

Best Publications

  • The science of fake news

    David M. J. Lazer;Matthew A. Baum;Yochai Benkler;Adam J. Berinsky

  • When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler;Sean Richey;Gary L. Freed

  • The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics

    D.J. Flynn;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature

    Joshua A. Tucker;Andrew Guess;Pablo Barbera;Cristian Vaccari;Cristian Vaccari

  • Political sectarianism in America

    Eli J. Finkel;Christopher A. Bail;Mina Cikara;Peter H. Ditto

  • How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It

    Jacob M. Montgomery;Brendan Nyhan;Michelle Torres

  • Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media

    Katherine Clayton;Spencer Blair;Jonathan A. Busam;Samuel Forstner

  • A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India.

    Andrew M Guess;Michael Lerner;Benjamin Lyons;Jacob M Montgomery

  • The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform.

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler;Peter A. Ubel

  • Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.

    Andrew M. Guess;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign

    Andrew Guess;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability

    Brendan Nyhan;Ethan Porter;Jason Reifler;Thomas J. Wood

  • The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook

    Unknown

  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

    Unknown

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Unknown

  • Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate

    Brendan Nyhan

  • Bayesian Model Averaging: Theoretical Developments and Practical Applications

    Jacob M. Montgomery;Brendan Nyhan

  • Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact‐Checking

    Lucas Graves;Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • One Vote out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election

    Brendan Nyhan;Eric McGhee;John Sides;Seth Masket

  • The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions

    Brendan Nyhan;Jason Reifler

  • Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions

    Brendan Nyhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason Reifler
Jason Reifler University of Southampton
John M. Carey
John M. Carey Dartmouth College
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
Donald P. Green
Donald P. Green Columbia University
Daniel J. Benjamin
Daniel J. Benjamin University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Simine Vazire
Simine Vazire University of Melbourne
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens the door to a wide range of academic and career opportunities. Many students interested in politics, law, or government choose to supplement their studies with related degrees. For instance, earning one of the online history master's degrees can offer strong contextual knowledge that enhances political analysis and research skills.

Career-minded students may also consider certifications that pay well, such as project management or paralegal credentials, which are often quick to obtain and can be completed online. If you are looking to advance your education efficiently, the fastest online master's degree programs allow you to gain advanced knowledge without a long time commitment.

Finally, for those seeking affordable education options, the cheapest online college choices can help minimize student debt while providing flexible, high-quality learning experiences. By combining these pathways, students can customize their education and career journey to meet their unique goals.

Best Scientists Citing Brendan Nyhan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles