World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
62
Citations
25795
World Ranking
95
National Ranking
59

Joshua A. Tucker publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua A. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 288 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Joshua A. Tucker D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua A. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua A. Tucker is affiliated with New York University in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the social sciences. Their scholarly work broadly covers several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics of their research encompass Social Media and Politics, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Media Influence and Politics, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Media Studies and Communication, and Computational and Text Analysis Methods. These focus areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach combining social science methods with computational techniques.

Tucker has contributed frequently to various academic venues. These include multiple publications in the SSRN Electronic Journal and Harvard Dataverse, alongside contributions to the Journal of Experimental Political Science, Science, and Nature. The diversity of these venues shows engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed platforms.

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on current political and social issues, including:

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Political sectarianism in America (2020, Science)
  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook (2023, Science)
  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? (2023, Science)

Tucker's research collaboration network includes frequent partnerships with Jonathan Nagler, Richard Bonneau, Andrew M. Guess, Megan Brown, and Brendan Nyhan. These coauthors appear across many publications, indicating sustained collaborative efforts.

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • Tweeting From Left to Right Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber

    Pablo Barberá;John T. Jost;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks

    William J. Brady;Julian A. Wills;John T. Jost;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook

    Andrew Guess;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua Tucker

  • Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature

    Joshua A. Tucker;Andrew Guess;Pablo Barbera;Cristian Vaccari;Cristian Vaccari

  • Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions

    Joshua A. Tucker

  • Political sectarianism in America

    Eli J. Finkel;Christopher A. Bail;Mina Cikara;Peter H. Ditto

  • How social media facilitates political protest: information, motivation and social networks

    John T. Jost;Pablo Barberá;Richard Bonneau;Melanie Langer

  • Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.

    Pablo Barberá;Andreu Casas;Jonathan Nagler;Patrick J. Egan

  • Transitional winners and losers: Attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries

    Joshua A. Tucker;Alexander C. Pacek;Adam J. Berinsky

  • From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media And Democracy

    Joshua A. Tucker;Yannis Theocharis;Margaret E. Roberts;Pablo Barberá

  • Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches

    Eleanor Neff Powell;Joshua A. Tucker

  • The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests

    Pablo Barberá;Ning Wang;Richard Bonneau;John T. Jost

  • Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999

    Joshua A. Tucker

  • Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy

    Cristian Vaccari;Cristian Vaccari;Augusto Valeriani;Pablo Barberá;Richard Bonneau

  • Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook

    Unknown

  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

    Unknown

  • How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data:

    Gregory Eady;Jonathan Nagler;Andy Guess;Jan Zilinsky

  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases.

    Fuqing Wu;Amy Xiao;Jianbo Zhang;Katya Moniz

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • The economy, corruption, and the vote: Evidence from experiments in Sweden and Moldova

    Marko Klašnja;Joshua A. Tucker

  • An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data

    Michael Tomz;Joshua A. Tucker;Jason Wittenberg

  • The emergence of mass partisanship in Russia, 1993-1996

    Ted Brader;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries

    Alexander C. Pacek;Grigore Pop-Eleches;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Pocketbook vs. Sociotropic Corruption Voting

    Marko Klašnja;Joshua A. Tucker;Kevin Deegan-Krause

  • Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes

    Grigore Pop-Eleches;Joshua A. Tucker

  • THE FIRST DECADE OF POST-COMMUNIST ELECTIONS AND VOTING: What Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?

    Joshua A. Tucker

  • Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies

    Ted Brader;Joshua A. Tucker;Dominik Duell

  • Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Elizabeth A. Harris;Philip Pärnamets;Philip Pärnamets;Steve Rathje

  • Associated with the Past?: Communist Legacies and Civic Participation in Post-Communist Countries

    Grigore Pop-Eleches;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Communism's Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes

    Grigore Pop-Eleches;Grigore Pop-Eleches;Joshua A. Tucker;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Elections, Protest, and Alternation of Power

    Andrew T. Little;Joshua A. Tucker;Tom LaGatta

  • People Power or a One-Shot Deal? A Dynamic Model of Protest

    Adam Meirowitz;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Communism's Shadow: Postcommunist Legacies, Values, and Behavior

    Grigore Pop-Eleches;Joshua A. Tucker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Nagler
Jonathan Nagler New York University
Richard Bonneau
Richard Bonneau New York University
Grigore Pop-Eleches
Grigore Pop-Eleches Princeton University
Ted Brader
Ted Brader University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Cristian Vaccari
Cristian Vaccari University of Edinburgh
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Rebecca B. Morton
Rebecca B. Morton New York University
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science offers a versatile foundation for various rewarding careers—both in government and beyond. For those looking to enhance their qualifications quickly, there are certifications for jobs that can boost your skill set and job prospects, often in less time than traditional degrees.

If you're interested in accelerating your education, some institutions offer a 6 month master's degree online, allowing you to gain advanced credentials at a faster pace. This is ideal for professionals seeking career advancement without long study periods.

Budget-conscious students can explore affordable colleges online, making it possible to earn respected degrees without incurring overwhelming debt. Flexible online learning also makes balancing work or family commitments much easier.

For those interested in fields related to social governance, exploring high paying jobs for environmental science majors is worthwhile. Environmental policy, analysis, and advocacy offer excellent opportunities for Political Science graduates passionate about making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua A. Tucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles