World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
50
Citations
14528
World Ranking
236
National Ranking
137

Jonathan Nagler publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Nagler sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 153 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Jonathan Nagler D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Nagler sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Nagler is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences with 124 publications. Their research spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, communication, artificial intelligence, political science and international relations, and general social sciences.

The main topics covered in Jonathan Nagler's work include:

  • Social Media and Politics
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Media Studies and Communication

Their recent notable papers include:

  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Automated Text Classification of News Articles: A Practical Guide, 2020, Political Analysis
  • SARS-CoV-2 titers in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • News credibility labels have limited average effects on news diet quality and fail to reduce misperceptions, 2022, Science Advances
  • Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior, 2023, Nature Communications

Jonathan Nagler has frequently published in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, SSRN Electronic Journal, Political Analysis, arXiv (Cornell University), and the Journal of Experimental Political Science.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Pablo Barberá
  • Suzanna Linn
  • Amber E. Boydstun
  • Ryan McMahon
  • Joshua A. Tucker

Best Publications

  • Tweeting From Left to Right Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber

    Pablo Barberá;John T. Jost;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook

    Andrew Guess;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua Tucker

  • When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election

    Jonathan Nagler;R. Michael Alvarez

  • How social media facilitates political protest: information, motivation and social networks

    John T. Jost;Pablo Barberá;Richard Bonneau;Melanie Langer

  • A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Who Votes Now?: Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States

    Jan E. Leighley;Jonathan Nagler

  • Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.

    Pablo Barberá;Andreu Casas;Jonathan Nagler;Patrick J. Egan

  • Individual and Systemic Influences on Turnout: Who Votes? 1984

    Jan E. Leighley;Jonathan Nagler

  • Socioeconomic Class Bias in Turnout, 1964–1988: The Voters Remain the Same.

    Jan E. Leighley;Jonathan Nagler

  • The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests

    Pablo Barberá;Ning Wang;Richard Bonneau;John T. Jost

  • Scobit: An Alternative Estimator to Logit and Probit

    Jonathan Nagler

  • Economics, Entitlements and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy

    Cristian Vaccari;Cristian Vaccari;Augusto Valeriani;Pablo Barberá;Richard Bonneau

  • How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data:

    Gregory Eady;Jonathan Nagler;Andy Guess;Jan Zilinsky

  • SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater foreshadow dynamics and clinical presentation of new COVID-19 cases.

    Fuqing Wu;Amy Xiao;Jianbo Zhang;Katya Moniz

  • Strategic Voting In British Elections

    R. Michael Alvarez;Frederick J. Boehmke;Jonathan Nagler

  • Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections, 1980-1992

    Carole Kennedy Chaney;R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler;Shaun Bowler

  • Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation

    R. Michael Alvarez;Jonathan Nagler

  • Where Is the Schema? Going Beyond the “S” Word in Political Psychology

    Jonathan Nagler

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua A. Tucker
Joshua A. Tucker New York University
R. Michael Alvarez
R. Michael Alvarez California Institute of Technology
Richard Bonneau
Richard Bonneau New York University
Jan E. Leighley
Jan E. Leighley American University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Cristian Vaccari
Cristian Vaccari University of Edinburgh
Shaun Bowler
Shaun Bowler University of California, Riverside
William P. Hanage
William P. Hanage Harvard University
Stefan Wuertz
Stefan Wuertz Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related academic fields and professional opportunities. Students who are interested in deepening their expertise or broadening their perspectives might consider pursuing interdisciplinary studies. Exploring master's interdisciplinary studies can help you integrate political science with subjects like economics, sociology, or communication for a more versatile degree.

For those passionate about history or looking to complement their political science background, learning how to get a degree in history can provide valuable context and research skills for policy analysis, government work, or academia. Online graduate programs are widely available and can be affordable—discover the cheapest online history master's degree options to further your education without breaking the bank.

Political science graduates also have opportunities in information management and research. If you’re interested in curating knowledge or working in a research library setting, the best online library science programs can prepare you for careers in archives, information science, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Nagler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles