World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
7172
World Ranking
8929
National Ranking
3777

Philip H. Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip H. Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip H. Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip H. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip H. Smith is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research focus lies primarily within the field of neuroscience, with 20 publications contributing to this domain.

Their work spans several subfields including:

  • Sensory Systems
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Smith's research addresses a range of topics, particularly in auditory and neural sciences. The main topics covered by their publications include:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Smith illustrate their contributions to understanding auditory processing and neural mechanisms. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Glycinergic axonal inhibition subserves acute spatial sensitivity to sudden increases in sound intensity," 2021, published in eLife
  • "Mammalian octopus cells are direction selective to frequency sweeps by excitatory synaptic sequence detection," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis," 2021, Journal of Small Animal Practice
  • "Glycinergic axonal inhibition subserves acute spatial sensitivity to sudden increases in sound intensity," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Local targets of T-stellate cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus," 2022, The Journal of Comparative Neurology

Smith frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Philip X. Joris
  • Hsin-Wei Lu
  • Tom P. Franken
  • Donata Oertel
  • Brian Bondy

The work of Smith has been published repeatedly in certain venues, reflecting ongoing involvement with specific academic communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology
  • eLife
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat dorsal cochlear nucleus

    W. S. Rhode;P. H. Smith;D. Oertel

  • Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency

    Philip X. Joris;Laurel H. Carney;Philip H. Smith;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive.

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

    Philip H. Smith;William S. Rhode

  • Projections of physiologically characterized globular bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Laurel H. Carney;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Coincidence detection in the auditory system: 50 years after Jeffress.

    Philip X Joris;Philip H Smith;Tom C.T Yin

  • Intracellular recordings from neurobiotin-labeled cells in brain slices of the rat medial nucleus of the trapezoid body.

    MI Banks;PH Smith

  • Detection of synchrony in the activity of auditory nerve fibers by octopus cells of the mammalian cochlear nucleus

    Donata Oertel;Ramazan Bal;Stephanie M. Gardner;Philip H. Smith

  • Anatomy and Physiology of Principal Cells of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body (MNTB) of the Cat

    Philip H. Smith;Philip X. Joris;Philip X. Joris;Tom C. T. Yin

  • Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers

    William S. Rhode;Philip H. Smith

  • Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail

    Philip Joris;P H Smith;T C Yin

  • A MONOSYNAPTIC GABAERGIC INPUT FROM THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS TO THE MEDIAL GENICULATE BODY IN RAT

    Daniel Peruzzi;Edward Bartlett;Philip H. Smith;Douglas L. Oliver

  • Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in neurons of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: voltage-clamp analysis and enhancement by norepinephrine and cAMP suggest a modulatory mechanism in the auditory brain stem

    M. I. Banks;R. A. Pearce;P. H. Smith

  • Structural and functional differences distinguish principal from nonprincipal cells in the guinea pig MSO slice.

    P. H. Smith

  • Anatomic, intrinsic, and synaptic properties of dorsal and ventral division neurons in rat medial geniculate body.

    Edward L. Bartlett;Philip H. Smith

  • Fundamental differences between the thalamocortical recipient layers of the cat auditory and visual cortices

    Philip H. Smith;Luis C. Populin

  • Characterization of HRP-labeled globular bushy cells in the cat anteroventral cochlear nucleus

    Philip H. Smith;William S. Rhode

  • Anatomy and physiology of multipolar cells in the rat inferior collicular cortex using the in vitro brain slice technique

    Philip H. Smith

  • Anatomy, Physiology, and Synaptic Responses of Rat Layer V Auditory Cortical Cells and Effects of Intracellular GABAABlockade

    Brenda J. Hefti;Philip H. Smith

  • Electron microscopic features of physiologically characterized, HRP-labeled fusiform cells in the cat dorsal cochlear nucleus.

    Philip H. Smith;William S. Rhode

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom C. T. Yin
Tom C. T. Yin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Donata Oertel
Donata Oertel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert A. Pearce
Robert A. Pearce University of Wisconsin–Madison
Douglas L. Oliver
Douglas L. Oliver University of Connecticut Health Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philip H. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles