World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
8983
World Ranking
7337
National Ranking
3170

Robert A. Pearce publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 129 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert A. Pearce D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Pearce sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Pearce is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields primarily in neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience, critical care and intensive care medicine, developmental neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and anesthesiology and pain medicine.

Their work focuses on key topics including intensive care unit cognitive disorders, anesthesia and neurotoxicity research, anesthesia and sedative agents, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neural dynamics and brain function, memory and neural mechanisms, and neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms.

Robert A. Pearce has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications in the following journals:

  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • BJA Open
  • Brain Communications

Among recent papers, the following stand out with details on title, year, and venue:

  • Postoperative delirium and changes in the blood-brain barrier, neuroinflammation, and cerebrospinal fluid lactate: a prospective cohort study (2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Association between plasma tau and postoperative delirium incidence and severity: a prospective observational study (2020, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • GABA facilitates spike propagation through branch points of sensory axons in the spinal cord (2022, Nature Neuroscience)
  • Distinct EEG signatures differentiate unconsciousness and disconnection during anaesthesia and sleep (2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Cohort Analysis of the Association of Delirium Severity With Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-Tau-Neurodegeneration Pathologies (2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series A)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Richard Lennertz
  • Robert D. Sanders
  • Cameron Casey
  • David Kunkel
  • Margaret Parker

Best Publications

  • Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells

    Xue Jun Li;Zhong Wei Du;Ewa D. Zarnowska;Matthew Pankratz

  • Breakdown in cortical effective connectivity during midazolam-induced loss of consciousness

    Fabio Ferrarelli;Marcello Massimini;Simone Sarasso;Adenauer Casali

  • Diversity of inhibitory neurotransmission through GABAA receptors

    Istvan Mody;Robert A. Pearce

  • Directed Differentiation of Dopaminergic Neuronal Subtypes from Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Yiping Yan;Dali Yang;Ewa D. Zarnowska;Zhongwei Du

  • Targeted deletion in astrocyte intermediate filament (Gfap) alters neuronal physiology

    M A McCall;R G Gregg;R R Behringer;M Brenner

  • Functional Neural Development from Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Accelerated Synaptic Activity via Astrocyte Coculture

    Michael Johnson;Jason P. Weick;Robert A. Pearce;Su Chun Zhang

  • Physiological evidence for two distinct GABAA responses in rat hippocampus

    Robert A. Pearce

  • Networks of interneurons with fast and slow gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) kinetics provide substrate for mixed gamma-theta rhythm.

    John A. White;Matthew I. Banks;Robert A. Pearce;Nancy J. Kopell

  • Dual Actions of Volatile Anesthetics on GABAA IPSCs: Dissociation of Blocking and Prolonging Effects

    Matthew I. Banks;Robert A. Pearce

  • Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in neurons of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: voltage-clamp analysis and enhancement by norepinephrine and cAMP suggest a modulatory mechanism in the auditory brain stem

    M. I. Banks;R. A. Pearce;P. H. Smith

  • Postoperative delirium and changes in the blood-brain barrier, neuroinflammation, and cerebrospinal fluid lactate: a prospective cohort study.

    Unknown

  • The Synaptic Basis of GABAA,slow

    Matthew I. Banks;Tong-Bin Li;Robert A. Pearce

  • Kinetic Differences between Synaptic and Extrasynaptic GABA A Receptors in CA1 Pyramidal Cells

    Matthew I. Banks;Robert A. Pearce

  • Interactions between Distinct GABAA Circuits in Hippocampus

    Matthew I Banks;John A White;Robert A Pearce

  • GABAA,slow: causes and consequences

    Marco Capogna;Robert A. Pearce

  • Association between plasma tau and postoperative delirium incidence and severity: a prospective observational study.

    Tyler Ballweg;Marissa White;Margaret Parker;Cameron Casey

  • GABAA Receptor α5 Subunits Contribute to GABAA,slow Synaptic Inhibition in Mouse Hippocampus

    Ewa D. Zarnowska;Ruth Keist;Uwe Rudolph;Uwe Rudolph;Robert A. Pearce

  • Determination of diffusion and partition coefficients of propofol in rat brain tissue: implications for studies of drug action in vitro

    J.A. Gredell;P.A. Turnquist;M.B. MacIver;R.A. Pearce

  • Effect of Volatile Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission in the Rat Hippocampus

    Robert A. Pearce;Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Determination of the EC50 amnesic concentration of etomidate and its diffusion profile in brain tissue: implications for in vitro studies.

    Claudia Benkwitz;Mark Liao;Michael J. Laster;James M. Sonner

  • GABAA-Mediated IPSCs in Piriform Cortex Have Fast and Slow Components With Different Properties and Locations on Pyramidal Cells

    A. Kapur;R. A. Pearce;W. W. Lytton;L. B. Haberly

  • An Isoflurane- and Alcohol-Insensitive Mutant GABAA Receptor α1 Subunit with Near-Normal Apparent Affinity for GABA: Characterization in Heterologous Systems and Production of Knockin Mice

    C. M. Borghese;D. F. Werner;N. Topf;N. V. Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg E. Homanics
Gregg E. Homanics University of Pittsburgh
Mervyn Maze
Mervyn Maze University of California, San Francisco
Su-Chun Zhang
Su-Chun Zhang University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael E. Talkowski
Michael E. Talkowski Harvard University
Justin C. Williams
Justin C. Williams University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lingjun Li
Lingjun Li University of Wisconsin–Madison
John A. White
John A. White Boston University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Giulio Tononi
Giulio Tononi University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edmond I. Eger
Edmond I. Eger University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and exciting career paths. Students interested in mental health practice can pursue online psyd programs accredited by apa, which prepare graduates for careers as licensed psychologists. These programs offer the flexibility of online learning while ensuring high accreditation standards.

For those looking to enter the field more quickly, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs provide a pathway to licensure in counseling and therapy roles, focusing on interpersonal and family dynamics.

Undergraduates aiming for a faster route can also consider an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited. These programs allow students to complete their studies in less time, often catering to working adults or those seeking a career change.

Finally, aligning your degree choice with future salary prospects is important. Exploring the highest earning degrees can help you make an informed decision about your major and potential career in neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Pearce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles