World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 58 2503 2392 767 697 225 12149

Justin C. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin C. Williams between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin C. Williams published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2014. 5 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2014. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin C. Williams: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 6
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 8
2004 10
2005 14
2006 5
2007 12
2008 7
2009 16
2010 14
2011 12
2012 10
2013 16
2014 23
2015 14
2016 11
2017 12
2018 16
2019 15
2020 15
2021 10
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 4
2026 1
Total 273
Download as CSV

Justin C. Williams publications per year - data summary

  • Justin C. Williams, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, has 273 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2000 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.8 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 13 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2006: 57 publications (5.2 per year); 2007-2017: 147 publications (13.4 per year); 2018-2026: 69 publications (7.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Justin C. Williams publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 225 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346 225
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin C. Williams publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Justin C. Williams, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 225 publications - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Justin C. Williams, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Justin C. Williams ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Justin C. Williams D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166 58
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Justin C. Williams D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Justin C. Williams, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 58 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Justin C. Williams, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Justin C. Williams ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Justin C. Williams is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with substantial contributions in neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience. Biomedical engineering and pulmonary and respiratory medicine are also notable areas within their work.

The scientist has extensively studied topics including neuroscience and neural engineering, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, vagus nerve stimulation research, muscle activation and electromyography studies, neurological disorders and treatments, heart rate variability and autonomic control, and photoreceptor and optogenetics research.

Williams has published research articles in a variety of venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Their recent papers include:

  • Functional vagotopy in the cervical vagus nerve of the domestic pig: implications for the study of vagus nerve stimulation, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Graded recruitment of pupil-linked neuromodulation by parametric stimulation of the vagus nerve, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Sources of off-target effects of vagus nerve stimulation using the helical clinical lead in domestic pigs, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Auricular Vagus Neuromodulation-A Systematic Review on Quality of Evidence and Clinical Effects, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Spatially selective stimulation of the pig vagus nerve to modulate target effect versus side effect, 2023, Journal of Neural Engineering

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of coauthors, notably Aaron J. Suminski, Kip A. Ludwig, James K. Trevathan, Aaron M. Dingle, and Andrew J. Shoffstall, with several joint publications spanning years.

Best Publications

  • Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability

    P.J. Rousche;D.S. Pellinen;D.P. Pivin;J.C. Williams

  • Graphene-based carbon-layered electrode array technology for neural imaging and optogenetic applications

    Dong Wook Park;Amelia A. Schendel;Solomon Mikael;Sarah K. Brodnick

  • Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex

    R.J. Vetter;J.C. Williams;J.F. Hetke;E.A. Nunamaker

  • Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex

    Justin C Williams;Robert L Rennaker;Daryl R Kipke

  • Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex

    D.R. Kipke;R.J. Vetter;J.C. Williams;J.F. Hetke

  • Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants

    Justin C Williams;Joseph A Hippensteel;John Dilgen;William Shain

  • ECoG factors underlying multimodal control of a brain-computer interface

    J.A. Wilson;E.A. Felton;P.C. Garell;G. Schalk

  • Counterpart Models in Facility Location Science and Reserve Selection Science

    Charles S. ReVelle;Justin C. Williams;John J. Boland

  • Electrocorticographically controlled brain-computer interfaces using motor and sensory imagery in patients with temporary subdural electrode implants. Report of four cases.

    Elizabeth A. Felton;J. Adam Wilson;Justin C. Williams;P. Charles Garell;P. Charles Garell

  • Device for creating a neural interface and method for making same

    Daryl Kipke;Justin Williams;Patrick Rousche;David S. Pellinen

  • Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves

    Justin C. Williams;Charles S. ReVelle;Simon Asher Levin

  • Intracranial neural interface system

    Daryl R. Kipke;Justin C. Williams;Jamille Hetke;Jaimie Henderson

  • Electrical Neural Stimulation and Simultaneous in Vivo Monitoring with Transparent Graphene Electrode Arrays Implanted in GCaMP6f Mice

    Dong-Wook Park;Jared P. Ness;Sarah K. Brodnick;Corinne Esquibel

  • A practical procedure for real-time functional mapping of eloquent cortex using electrocorticographic signals in humans

    Peter Brunner;Peter Brunner;Anthony L. Ritaccio;Timothy M. Lynch;Joseph F. Emrich

  • A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke.

    Alexander Remsik;Brittany Young;Rebecca Vermilyea;Laura Kiekhoefer

  • Brain slice on a chip: opportunities and challenges of applying microfluidic technology to intact tissues

    Yu Huang;Justin C. Williams;Stephen M. Johnson

  • Fabrication and utility of a transparent graphene neural electrode array for electrophysiology, in vivo imaging, and optogenetics

    Dong Wook Park;Sarah K. Brodnick;Jared P. Ness;Farid Atry

  • Long-Term Measurement of Impedance in Chronically Implanted Depth and Subdural Electrodes During Responsive Neurostimulation in Humans

    Karl A. Sillay;Paul Rutecki;Kathy Cicora;Greg Worrell

  • Reserve assemblage of critical areas: A zero-one programming approach

    Justin C. Williams;Charles S. ReVelle

  • A Zero-One Programming Model for Contiguous Land Acquisition

    Justin C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivek Prabhakaran
Vivek Prabhakaran University of Wisconsin–Madison
Daryl R. Kipke
Daryl R. Kipke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charles ReVelle
Charles ReVelle Johns Hopkins University
Zhenqiang Ma
Zhenqiang Ma University of Wisconsin–Madison
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill Duke University
Charles C. Branas
Charles C. Branas Columbia University
David J. Beebe
David J. Beebe University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gerwin Schalk
Gerwin Schalk Sichuan University
Alexander J. Blake
Alexander J. Blake University of Nottingham
Robert G. Radwin
Robert G. Radwin University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Justin C. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles