World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
95
Citations
46887
World Ranking
197
National Ranking
72

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
95
Citations
47894
World Ranking
1865
National Ranking
1026

David J. Beebe publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Beebe sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 503 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

David J. Beebe D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Beebe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award

Overview

David J. Beebe is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Engineering. The scientist's work is heavily focused on several subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Oncology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects related to cancer and biomedical innovation. Key focus areas include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research, Cancer Cells and Metastasis, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation, Immune Cells in Cancer, Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms, as well as Bacterial Biofilms and Quorum Sensing.

David J. Beebe has published extensively, with frequent publication venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Lab on a Chip
  • Nature Communications
  • Integrative Biology

Some of their recent papers are:

  • A role for microfluidic systems in precision medicine (2022), Nature Communications
  • Microfluidic tumor-on-a-chip model to evaluate the role of tumor environmental stress on NK cell exhaustion (2021), Science Advances
  • Breast Fibroblasts and ECM Components Modulate Breast Cancer Cell Migration through the Secretion of MMPs in a 3D Microfluidic Co-Culture Model (2020), Cancers
  • Microfluidic lumen-based systems for advancing tubular organ modeling (2020), Chemical Society Reviews
  • Human Tumor-Lymphatic Microfluidic Model Reveals Differential Conditioning of Lymphatic Vessels by Breast Cancer Cells (2020), Advanced Healthcare Materials

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research activity. Frequent co-authors include José M. Ayuso, Joshua M. Lang, María Virumbrales-Muñoz, Sheena C. Kerr, and Melissa C. Skala.

Best Publications

  • The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research

    Eric K. Sackmann;Anna L. Fulton;David J. Beebe

  • Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology.

    David J. Beebe;Glennys A. Mensing;Glenn M. Walker

  • Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels

    David J. Beebe;Jeffrey S. Moore;Joseph M. Bauer;Qing Yu

  • Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel

    R.H. Liu;M.A. Stremler;K.V. Sharp;M.G. Olsen

  • A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics

    J. G. Santiago;S. T. Wereley;C. D. Meinhart;D. J. Beebe

  • Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer

    B.-H. Jo;L.M. Van Lerberghe;K.M. Motsegood;D.J. Beebe

  • PDMS absorption of small molecules and consequences in microfluidic applications

    Michael W. Toepke;David J. Beebe

  • Controlled microfluidic interfaces

    Javier Atencia;David J. Beebe

  • Adaptive liquid microlenses activated by stimuli-responsive hydrogels

    Liang Dong;Abhishek K. Agarwal;David J. Beebe;Hongrui Jiang

  • Surface-Directed Liquid Flow Inside Microchannels

    Bin Zhao;Jeffrey S. Moore;David J. Beebe

  • Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia

    Erwin Berthier;Edmond W. K. Young;David Beebe

  • Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture.

    Keil J. Regehr;Maribella Domenech;Justin T. Koepsel;Kristopher C. Carver

  • Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments

    Edmond W. K. Young;David J. Beebe

  • Micromilling: a method for ultra-rapid prototyping of plastic microfluidic devices

    David J. Guckenberger;Theodorus E. de Groot;Alwin M. D. Wan;David J. Beebe

  • A passive pumping method for microfluidic devices.

    Glenn M. Walker;David J. Beebe

  • Equilibrium swelling and kinetics of pH-responsive hydrogels: models, experiments, and simulations

    S.K. De;N.R. Aluru;B. Johnson;W.C. Crone

  • Microenvironment design considerations for cellular scale studies

    Glenn M. Walker;Henry C. Zeringue;David J. Beebe

  • Flow control with hydrogels

    David T. Eddington;David J. Beebe

  • Microfabricated elastomeric stencils for micropatterning cell cultures.

    Albert Folch;Byung Ho Jo;Octavio Hurtado;David J. Beebe;David J. Beebe

  • Microfluidic tectonics: a comprehensive construction platform for microfluidic systems.

    David J. Beebe;Jeffrey S. Moore;Qing Yu;Robin H. Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey S. Moore
Jeffrey S. Moore University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Anna Huttenlocher
Anna Huttenlocher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric A. Johnson
Eric A. Johnson University of Wisconsin–Madison
William L. Murphy
William L. Murphy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nancy P. Keller
Nancy P. Keller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Manuel Doblaré
Manuel Doblaré University of Zaragoza
Sean P. Palecek
Sean P. Palecek University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert G. Radwin
Robert G. Radwin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ronald J. Adrian
Ronald J. Adrian Arizona State University
Narayana R Aluru
Narayana R Aluru University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Engineering and Technology in the USA, many flexible online learning options are available. For those seeking rapid advancement, exploring 6 month master's degree online programs can be a great way to gain specialized skills quickly while balancing work and family responsibilities.

Alternatively, shorter programs such as 6-month certificate programs that pay well offer focused career training designed to get you job-ready fast in high-demand tech fields.

Many adults, including busy parents, may prefer the flexibility provided by online study. There are tailored options, including some of the best online degrees for moms, designed to fit into demanding family schedules while still opening doors to lucrative technology and engineering careers.

If you’re looking for an even faster way to upskill, some accredited colleges now offer 6 week college courses. These can help you earn credits or valuable certifications in a very short time, making your pathway to success more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Beebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles