World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
14006
World Ranking
2774
National Ranking
846

William L. Murphy publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 194 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

William L. Murphy D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

William L. Murphy is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research encompasses various fields, primarily within Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Engineering. More specifically, their work focuses on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Oncology, and Genetics.

The scientist's studies cover a range of topics including:

  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel," 2020, published in Nature Reviews Materials
  • "3D iPSC modeling of the retinal pigment epithelium-choriocapillaris complex identifies factors involved in the pathology of macular degeneration," 2021, published in Cell Stem Cell
  • "Single-dose mRNA therapy via biomaterial-mediated sequestration of overexpressed proteins," 2020, published in Science Advances
  • "Engineered Perineural Vascular Plexus for Modeling Developmental Toxicity," 2020, published in Advanced Healthcare Materials
  • "The secondary injury cascade after spinal cord injury: an analysis of local cytokine/chemokine regulation," 2023, published in Neural Regeneration Research

This researcher frequently publishes in venues such as Biomaterials Science, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, Cell Stem Cell, Advanced Healthcare Materials, and Neural Regeneration Research.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Connie S. Chamberlain, Joshua A. Choe, Padma Gopalan, Gianluca Fontana, and Ray Vanderby. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications, underscoring ongoing partnerships in the biomedical and engineering research communities.

Best Publications

  • Materials as stem cell regulators

    William L. Murphy;Todd C. McDevitt;Adam J. Engler

  • Handbook of biomaterial properties

    William Murphy;Jonathan Black;Garth W. Hastings

  • Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel.

    Elizabeth A. Aisenbrey;William L. Murphy

  • Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture.

    Keil J. Regehr;Maribella Domenech;Justin T. Koepsel;Kristopher C. Carver

  • Moving from static to dynamic complexity in hydrogel design

    Jason A. Burdick;William L. Murphy

  • Sustained release of vascular endothelial growth factor from mineralized poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering

    William L Murphy;Martin C Peters;David H Kohn;David J Mooney

  • Salt Fusion: An Approach to Improve Pore Interconnectivity within Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

    William L. Murphy;Robert G. Dennis;Joel L. Kileny;David J. Mooney

  • Growth of continuous bonelike mineral within porous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds in vitro.

    William L. Murphy;David H. Kohn;David J. Mooney

  • Crossing kingdoms: Using decellularized plants as perfusable tissue engineering scaffolds.

    Joshua R. Gershlak;Sarah Hernandez;Gianluca Fontana;Luke R. Perreault

  • Bioinspired growth of crystalline carbonate apatite on biodegradable polymer substrata.

    William L. Murphy;David J. Mooney

  • Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural constructs for predicting neural toxicity

    Michael P. Schwartz;Zhonggang Hou;Nicholas E. Propson;Jue Zhang

  • Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

    Scott J. Hollister;William L. Murphy

  • Substratum-induced differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells reveals the coactivator YAP is a potent regulator of neuronal specification

    Samira Musah;Paul J. Wrighton;Yefim Zaltsman;Xiaofen Zhong

  • Controlled delivery of inductive proteins, plasmid DNA and cells from tissue engineering matrices

    William L. Murphy;David J. Mooney

  • Mineralization and Biological Modification of Biomaterial Surfaces

    William L. Murphy;Martin C. Peters;David J. Mooney;David H. Kohn

  • Biomaterials that regulate growth factor activity via bioinspired interactions.

    Gregory A. Hudalla;William L. Murphy

  • Controlled nucleation of hydroxyapatite on alginate scaffolds for stem cell-based bone tissue engineering

    Darilis Suárez-González;Kara Barnhart;Eiji Saito;Ray Vanderby

  • Human Vascular Tissue Models Formed from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Endothelial Cells

    David G. Belair;Jordan A. Whisler;Jorge Valdez;Jeremy Velazquez

  • Bioinspired Design of Dynamic Materials

    Javeed Shaikh Mohammed;William L. Murphy

  • Tissue engineering scaffolds

    William L. Murphy;Robert G. Dennis;David J. Mooney

  • An adaptable hydrogel array format for 3-dimensional cell culture and analysis

    Leenaporn Jongpaiboonkit;William J. King;Gary E. Lyons;Amy L. Paguirigan

  • Controllable mineral coatings on PCL scaffolds as carriers for growth factor release

    Darilis Suárez-González;Kara Barnhart;Francesco Migneco;Colleen Flanagan

  • Protein‐Based Hydrogels with Tunable Dynamic Responses

    Zhijie Sui;William J. King;William L. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Thomson
James A. Thomson University of California, Santa Barbara
David J. Mooney
David J. Mooney Harvard University
Eben Alsberg
Eben Alsberg University of Illinois at Chicago
Scott J. Hollister
Scott J. Hollister Georgia Institute of Technology
David H. Kohn
David H. Kohn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Todd C. McDevitt
Todd C. McDevitt University of California, San Francisco
David J. Beebe
David J. Beebe University of Wisconsin–Madison
Padma Gopalan
Padma Gopalan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ron Stewart
Ron Stewart Morgridge Institute for Research
Bruce Remington
Bruce Remington Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your qualifications in Engineering and Technology can be more versatile than ever, thanks to flexible and affordable online degree options. Beyond traditional engineering programs, emerging fields and competitive industries often seek candidates with additional credentials and business acumen.

For those looking to strengthen their management skills within the tech sector, there are affordable online mba programs no gmat that allow you to gain leadership expertise without standardized testing barriers. Similarly, project management remains a crucial skill set, and a cheap project management degree online can prepare you to lead engineering and technical projects efficiently.

Interested in real estate within technology-driven markets? Consider a cheap online real estate school for a specialized credential that opens doors in property development, smart infrastructure, and more. If you have a passion for design and user experience, a ui/ux design bachelor's degree online can help you enter the digital transformation space, shaping products and platforms in the tech industry.

Exploring these online degree programs can significantly broaden your career options and keep you competitive in today’s fast-evolving sector.

Best Scientists Citing William L. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles