World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
11868
World Ranking
16048
National Ranking
6658

Todd C. McDevitt publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd C. McDevitt sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Todd C. McDevitt D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd C. McDevitt sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd C. McDevitt is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Biophysics, and Oncology.

McDevitt's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

The scientist has contributed to numerous publications, with a number appearing in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Development, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Methods in Molecular Biology, and Science Translational Medicine.

Notable recent papers include:

  • SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived cardiac cells reflects cytopathic features in hearts of patients with COVID-19, 2021, Science Translational Medicine
  • Co-emergence of cardiac and gut tissues promotes cardiomyocyte maturation within human iPSC-derived organoids, 2021, Cell stem cell
  • Heparin-mediated delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 improves spatial localization of bone regeneration, 2020, Science Advances
  • The NIH Somatic Cell Genome Editing program, 2021, Nature
  • SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived cardiac cells predicts novel cytopathic features in hearts of COVID-19 patients, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators in McDevitt's research include David Joy, Oriane B. Matthys, Ashley R.G. Libby, Emily A. Bulger, and Lyandysha V. Zholudeva, with collaborative efforts featuring multiple coauthorships.

Best Publications

  • Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment

    Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins;Michael E G Sauria;Amartya Sanyal;Tatiana I. Gerasimova

  • Materials as stem cell regulators

    William L. Murphy;Todd C. McDevitt;Adam J. Engler

  • Stem cell paracrine actions and tissue regeneration

    Priya R Baraniak;Todd C McDevitt;Todd C McDevitt

  • Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation.

    Andrés M. Bratt-Leal;Richard L. Carpenedo;Todd C. McDevitt;Todd C. McDevitt

  • Scaffold-free culture of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids in suspension preserves multilineage potential

    Priya R. Baraniak;Todd C. McDevitt

  • In vitro generation of differentiated cardiac myofibers on micropatterned laminin surfaces

    Todd C. McDevitt;John C. Angello;Marsha L. Whitney;Hans Reinecke

  • Rotary suspension culture enhances the efficiency, yield, and homogeneity of embryoid body differentiation.

    Richard L. Carpenedo;Carolyn Y. Sargent;Todd C. McDevitt;Todd C. McDevitt

  • Spatially organized layers of cardiomyocytes on biodegradable polyurethane films for myocardial repair.

    Todd C. McDevitt;Kimberly A. Woodhouse;Stephen D. Hauschka;Charles E. Murry

  • Proliferation of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells is mediated via the IGF/PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway

    Todd C. McDevitt;Michael A. Laflamme;Charles E. Murry

  • Cell-derived matrices for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.

    Lindsay E. Fitzpatrick;Todd C. McDevitt

  • Incorporation of biomaterials in multicellular aggregates modulates pluripotent stem cell differentiation.

    Andrés M. Bratt-Leal;Richard L. Carpenedo;Mark D. Ungrin;Peter W. Zandstra

  • Pre-conditioning mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids for immunomodulatory paracrine factor secretion

    Joshua A. Zimmermann;Todd C. Mcdevitt;Todd C. Mcdevitt

  • Homogeneous and organized differentiation within embryoid bodies induced by microsphere-mediated delivery of small molecules

    Richard L. Carpenedo;Andrés M. Bratt-Leal;Ross A. Marklein;Scott A. Seaman

  • The Multiparametric Effects of Hydrodynamic Environments on Stem Cell Culture

    Melissa A. Kinney;Carolyn Y. Sargent;Todd C. McDevitt;Todd C. McDevitt

  • SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived cardiac cells reflects cytopathic features in hearts of patients with COVID-19.

    Juan A. Perez-Bermejo;Serah Kang;Sarah J. Rockwood;Camille R. Simoneau;Camille R. Simoneau

  • Perspective: The promise of multi-cellular engineered living systems.

    Roger D. Kamm;Rashid Bashir;Natasha Arora;Roy D. Dar

  • Gelatin methacrylate microspheres for controlled growth factor release

    Anh H. Nguyen;Jay McKinney;Tobias Miller;Tom Bongiorno

  • Adhesion strength–based, label-free isolation of human pluripotent stem cells

    Ankur Singh;Shalu Suri;Ted Lee;Jamie M Chilton

  • Stem cell microencapsulation for phenotypic control, bioprocessing, and transplantation.

    Jenna L. Wilson;Todd C. McDevitt;Todd C. McDevitt

  • Hydrodynamic modulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation by rotary orbital suspension culture.

    Carolyn Y. Sargent;Geoffrey Y. Berguig;Melissa A. Kinney;Luke A. Hiatt

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick S. Stayton
Patrick S. Stayton University of Washington
Bruce R. Conklin
Bruce R. Conklin University of California, San Francisco
Andrés J. García
Andrés J. García Georgia Institute of Technology
William L. Murphy
William L. Murphy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Hua Wang
Hua Wang Georgia Institute of Technology
Charles E. Murry
Charles E. Murry University of Washington
Barbara D. Boyan
Barbara D. Boyan Virginia Commonwealth University
Peter W. Zandstra
Peter W. Zandstra University of British Columbia
Stephen D. Hauschka
Stephen D. Hauschka University of Washington
Sean P. Palecek
Sean P. Palecek University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide variety of online degrees and careers in the health and science sectors. Students interested in advanced practice nursing may consider online dnp programs without clinicals, which offer flexible learning for those aiming to hold leadership or educator roles in healthcare.

For those drawn to healthcare leadership and administration, earning a doctorate through one of the best online dha programs can give graduates an edge in hospital and healthcare management positions.

If pharmacology or medication management interests you, pursuing an online pharmd is an excellent career pathway, preparing graduates for diverse roles in the pharmaceutical industry, clinical pharmacy, or academia.

Alternatively, combining biology with human movement sciences is possible through an exercise science degree online. This field supports careers in fitness, physical therapy, sports medicine, and wellness coaching.

These pathways offer flexible, reputable online options for students seeking to advance their scientific expertise and pursue rewarding health-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Todd C. McDevitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles