World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
84
Citations
30134
World Ranking
3273
National Ranking
1658

Bruce R. Conklin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R. Conklin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 206 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bruce R. Conklin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R. Conklin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce R. Conklin is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans mainly across Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. The subfields of their expertise include Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scholar's work covers several main topics related to biomedical and genetic research. These include:

  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders

Bruce R. Conklin has published numerous papers in a number of prominent scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Stem Cell Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Cell Reports

Notable recent publications include:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived cardiac cells reflects cytopathic features in hearts of patients with COVID-19" (2021), published in Science Translational Medicine
  • "A reference human induced pluripotent stem cell line for large-scale collaborative studies" (2022), published in Cell Stem Cell
  • "Timed inhibition of CDC7 increases CRISPR-Cas9 mediated templated repair" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived cardiac cells predicts novel cytopathic features in hearts of COVID-19 patients" (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "CRISPR off-target detection with DISCOVER-seq" (2020), published in Nature Protocols

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Luke M. Judge
  • Juan A. Pérez-Bermejo
  • Hannah L. Watry
  • Gokul N. Ramadoss
  • Nevan J. Krogan

Best Publications

  • Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape

    Melissa S Cline;Michael Smoot;Ethan Cerami;Allan Kuchinsky

  • GenMAPP, a new tool for viewing and analyzing microarray data on biological pathways.

    Kam D. Dahlquist;Nathan Salomonis;Karen Vranizan;Steven C. Lawlor

  • MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data

    Scott W Doniger;Nathan Salomonis;Kam D Dahlquist;Karen Vranizan;Karen Vranizan

  • Substitution of three amino acids switches receptor specificity of Gq alpha to that of Gi alpha

    Bruce R. Conklin;Zvi Farfel;Kevin D. Lustig;David Julius

  • Hormonal stimulation of adenylyl cyclase through Gi-protein beta gamma subunits.

    Alex D. Federman;Bruce R. Conklin;Karen A. Schrader;Randall R. Reed

  • WikiPathways: Pathway Editing for the People

    Alexander R Pico;Thomas Kelder;Martijn P van Iersel;Kristina Hanspers

  • MicroRNA regulation of cell lineages in mouse and human embryonic stem cells.

    Kathryn N. Ivey;Alecia Muth;Joshua Arnold;Frank W. King

  • CRISPRi-based genome-scale identification of functional long noncoding RNA loci in human cells

    S. John Liu;Max A. Horlbeck;Seung Woo Cho;Harjus S. Birk

  • Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system

    Michael J. Workman;Maxime M. Mahe;Stephen Trisno;Holly M. Poling

  • Structural elements of Gα subunits that interact with Gβγ, receptors, and effectors

    Bruce R. Conklin;Henry R. Bourne

  • WikiPathways: building research communities on biological pathways

    Thomas Kelder;Martijn P. van Iersel;Kristina Hanspers;Martina Kutmon

  • Interfacing silicon nanowires with mammalian cells

    Woong Kim;Jennifer K. Ng;Miki E. Kunitake;Bruce R. Conklin

  • Human iPSC-based cardiac microphysiological system for drug screening applications.

    Anurag Mathur;Peter Loskill;Kaifeng Shao;Nathaniel Huebsch

  • CRISPR Interference Efficiently Induces Specific and Reversible Gene Silencing in Human iPSCs

    Mohammad A. Mandegar;Nathaniel Huebsch;Ekaterina B. Frolov;Edward Shin

  • Presenting and exploring biological pathways with PathVisio

    Martijn P. van Iersel;Thomas Kelder;Alexander R. Pico;Kristina Hanspers

  • Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using DISCOVER-Seq.

    Beeke Wienert;Beeke Wienert;Stacia K. Wyman;Christopher D. Richardson;Charles D. Yeh

  • AltAnalyze and DomainGraph: analyzing and visualizing exon expression data

    Dorothea Emig;Nathan Salomonis;Jan Baumbach;Thomas Lengauer

  • Canonical Wnt signaling is a positive regulator of mammalian cardiac progenitors.

    Chulan Kwon;Joshua Arnold;Edward C. Hsiao;Makoto M. Taketo

  • Model for long QT syndrome type 2 using human iPS cells demonstrates arrhythmogenic characteristics in cell culture.

    Anna L. Lahti;Ville J. Kujala;Hugh Chapman;Ari-Pekka Koivisto

  • Chimeric G Proteins Allow a High-Throughput Signaling Assay of Gi-Coupled Receptors

    P. Coward;S. D. H. Chan;H. G. Wada;G. M. Humphries

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan Salomonis
Nathan Salomonis Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Kevin E. Healy
Kevin E. Healy University of California, Berkeley
Henry R. Bourne
Henry R. Bourne University of California, San Francisco
Deepak Srivastava
Deepak Srivastava King's College London
Shinya Yamanaka
Shinya Yamanaka Kyoto University
Alexander R. Pico
Alexander R. Pico Gladstone Institutes
Todd C. McDevitt
Todd C. McDevitt University of California, San Francisco
Katherine S. Pollard
Katherine S. Pollard University of California, San Francisco
Nevan J. Krogan
Nevan J. Krogan University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Biology or Biochemistry, you’ll find a wide range of related online degrees and career options that blend science with practical skills. Careers in health information, medical coding, and nutrition are in high demand and provide excellent growth opportunities for graduates.

Many students leverage their biology background to enter health administration fields. For example, those interested in health data may pursue health information management online programs — a pathway focused on managing patient records and healthcare data systems.

Medical coding and billing are also attractive options. The medical coding jobs salary is competitive, making it a solid career for those with attention to detail. These roles remain in demand, with is medical billing and coding in demand being a common question among students looking for job security and remote work potential.

For those passionate about wellness or clinical nutrition, an advanced degree is possible from anywhere. You can enhance your expertise and expand your career horizons with a nutrition masters online, opening doors to roles in dietetics, public health, and food science.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce R. Conklin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles