World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7977
World Ranking
7222
National Ranking
20

Reidar Conradi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reidar Conradi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 207 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Reidar Conradi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reidar Conradi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Reidar Conradi is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. The academic focus and contributions of this researcher are primarily linked to this institution.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Reidar Conradi in the provided data. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been listed.

The lack of detailed information on main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work indicates either a broad or undocumented research scope within the accessible data. Consequently, specific research themes or academic specialties cannot be outlined.

This profile reflects the curated data available about Reidar Conradi without extrapolations or unverified claims. The scientist continues to be recognized through affiliation but without further accessible documentation on research outputs or scholarly collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Version models for software configuration management

    Reidar Conradi;Bernhard Westfechtel

  • Adoption of open source software in software-intensive organizations - A systematic literature review

    Øyvind Hauge;Claudia Ayala;Reidar Conradi

  • Impact of software engineering research on the practice of software configuration management

    Jacky Estublier;David Leblang;André van der Hoek;Reidar Conradi

  • Assessing process-centered software engineering environments

    Vincenzo Ambriola;Reidar Conradi;Alfonso Fuggetta

  • Quality, productivity and economic benefits of software reuse: a review of industrial studies

    Parastoo Mohagheghi;Reidar Conradi

  • An empirical study of software reuse vs. defect-density and stability

    Parastoo Mohagheghi;Reidar Conradi;Ole M. Killi;Henrik Schwarz

  • Effort estimation of use cases for incremental large-scale software development

    Parastoo Mohagheghi;Bente Anda;Reidar Conradi

  • Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management

    Claudia De O. Melo;Daniela S. Cruzes;Fabio Kon;Reidar Conradi

  • A SURVEY OF CASE STUDIES OF THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Reidar Conradi

  • Techniques for process model evolution in EPOS

    M.L. Jaccheri;R. Conradi

  • The impact of global dispersion on coordination, team performance and software quality – A systematic literature review

    Anh Nguyen-Duc;Daniela S. Cruzes;Reidar Conradi

  • The REBOOT approach to software reuse

    Guttorm Sindre;Reidar Conradi;Even-André Karlsson

  • Object-Oriented and Cooperative Process Modelling in EPOS

    Reidar Conradi;Marianne Hagaseth;Jens-Otto Larsen;Minh Ngoc Nguyên

  • Towards a Reference Framework for Process Concepts

    Reidar Conradi;Christer Fernström;Alfonso Fuggetta;Robert A. Snowdon

  • A layered architecture for uniform version management

    B. Westfechtel;B.P. Munch;R. Conradi

  • Development with Off-the-Shelf Components: 10 Facts

    Jingyue Li;R. Conradi;C. Bunse;M. Torchiano

  • Agile Team Perceptions of Productivity Factors

    Claudia Melo;Daniela S. Cruzes;Fabio Kon;Reidar Conradi

  • Change oriented versioning in a software engineering database

    A. Lie;R. Conradi;T. M. Didriksen;E.-A. Karlsson

  • An empirical investigation of software reuse benefits in a large telecom product

    Parastoo Mohagheghi;Reidar Conradi

  • Modelling Systems with Variability using the PROTEUS Configuration Language

    Eirik Tryggeseth;Bjorn Gulla;Reidar Conradi

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Torchiano
Marco Torchiano Polytechnic University of Turin
Maurizio Morisio
Maurizio Morisio Polytechnic University of Turin
Xavier Franch
Xavier Franch Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Torgeir Dingsøyr
Torgeir Dingsøyr Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Alfonso Fuggetta
Alfonso Fuggetta Polytechnic University of Milan
Forrest Shull
Forrest Shull Carnegie Mellon University
Muhammad Ali Babar
Muhammad Ali Babar University of Adelaide
Dag I. K. Sjøberg
Dag I. K. Sjøberg University of Oslo
Martin Höst
Martin Höst Malmö University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring options beyond traditional Computer Science degrees can open many doors for career growth. You might consider interdisciplinary programs to enhance your skills in leadership, management, or information science. For those interested in advancing to executive roles, an online executive mba offers valuable business and technology leadership training.

If your interests lean toward organizing information or digital resources, earning an mlis online (Master of Library and Information Science) may be an ideal fit. This can prepare you for careers in data curation, digital archiving, and library management.

Many students seek affordable master degree programs online to tailor their studies to specific career goals without straining their finances. These flexible programs let you build expertise while balancing other commitments.

For those aiming for top-level positions or academic careers, a phd in organizational leadership can pave the way to executive, research, or teaching roles. Exploring these related online degrees can help you shape a dynamic and diverse career pathway in the tech industry and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Reidar Conradi

Trending Scientists